Multimedia
Audio
Video
Photo

Peter Paul: Hillary Clinton's Torricelli Problem

Carl Desjardins, Martes, Octubre 8, 2002 - 20:24

form Judicial Watch

Of all the Senate Democrats watching Robert Torricelli end his reelection bid in disgrace yesterday, none could have been more concerned than the "Torch's" New York colleague, Sen. Hillary Clinton.

And it's not just because she, like all Democrats, fears losing control of the Senate in this fall's election.

No, Torricelli's political demise likely sent shivers through Mrs. Clinton for an entirely different reason. After all, she has her own David Chang to worry about.

Though the Democratic Party's Torricelli cover-up nearly worked, with former U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White declining to indict earlier this year despite mountains of incriminating evidence, White didn't count on the persistence of Mr. Chang, the government's key witness aginst the powerful Democrat.

Party insiders were hoping that the Torch would be able to finesse the routine Senate Ethics Committee probe that White recommended. But it didn't turn out that way.

Speaking through his lawyer, and more recently in-person in jailhouse interviews, Chang kept insisting that the Torch was "a criminal." And when a videotape surfaced last week that seemed to corroborate his claim that the New Jersey Democrat had dispatched a local leg-breaker to intimidate him, it may have been the last straw.

Like hero-whistleblower Chang, one-time Hollywood mogul Peter Paul has seen better days since he came forward with an ugly tale implicating Democratic Party royalty in campaign fraud. But the similarity doesn't end there.

Indicted by Justice Department Clintonistas on stock fraud charges two years ago, Paul continues to insist that the Clintons illegally accepted nearly $2 million in cash and in-kind contributions for Hillary's 2000 Senate campaign.

If the Bush Justice Department comes to believe Paul's charges - and he has reams of evidence to back his story up - it may not matter that ex-prosecutor White's office tried to do for Mrs. Clinton what she did for Torricelli, by deep-sixing Pardongate charges against the former first lady this summer.

Does that mean Hillary is likely to get torched as well? That seems like a long shot right now.

But the last word on Mr. Paul is that higher-ups at Justice are starting to warm to the overwhelming evidence he and his lawyers at Judicial Watch have amassed.

And like hero-whistleblower Chang, the Clinton accuser shows no indication he's ready to fall silent anytime soon.

www.newsmax.com


CMAQ: Vie associative


Collectif à Québec: n'existe plus.

Impliquez-vous !

 

Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une Politique éditoriale , qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.

This is an alternative media using open publishing. The CMAQ collective, who validates the posts submitted on the Indymedia-Quebec, does not endorse in any way the opinions and statements and does not judge if the information is correct or true. The quality of the information is evaluated by the comments from Internet surfers, like yourself. We nonetheless have an Editorial Policy , which essentially requires that posts be related to questions of emancipation and does not come from a commercial media.