Multimedia
Audio
Video
Photo

New York Times? Not on Your Toilet!

forpressfound, Domingo, Diciembre 4, 2005 - 13:50

Henk Ruyssenaars

Below is one of those examples again by the warmongering New York Times, proving today again why no normal human being should even use this warpropaganda rag on a toilet.

Even if the New York Times is the biggest 'Dreck' in journalism.

by Henk Ruyssenaars

Dec. - 4th - 2005 - "The ongoing US aggression in the Middle East raises the most serious questions about the role of the mass media in modern society. In the period leading up to the invasion, the American media uncritically advanced the Bush administration’s arguments, rooted in lies, distortions and half-truths, for an attack on Iraq. It virtually excluded all critical viewpoints, to the point of blacking out news of mass antiwar demonstrations and any other facts that contradicted the propaganda from the White House and Pentagon.

The obvious aim was to misinform and manipulate public opinion, and convince the tens of millions within the US who were opposed to the administration’s war policy that they constituted a small and helpless minority." A quote from "US prosecuted Nazi propagandists as war criminals" - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/9yncc

Below is one of those examples again by the warmongering New York Times, proving again why no normal human being should even use this warpropaganda rag on a toilet.

In today's gutter info the ill famous followers of Julius Streicher at the NYT - the warmakers and PNAC collaborators Sanger and Weisman - again lie and lie and lie and lie: trying for the umpteenth time to give the unjust impression that Iran should be attacked because it - like Iraq - 'is getting dangerous'. Again we are served the 'Mushroom cloud-threat' - whereas in reality the group fomenting the PNAC agenda is more dangerous to mankind than ever before. They must be stopped at any price.

As an experienced journalist I do have words to describe the behaviour by collaborating criminals like the Sangers, Weismans and Judith Millers of the NYT, but prefer not to stoop as low as their level. But why are all those war criminals - their bosses and henchmen - not in jail yet? We know who they are!

The first sentence in the article by the deceptive duo is like most what they spout their forst lie: "to allow strict controls on its nuclear program".

IRAN IS CONTROLLED 24 HOURS PER DAY, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK AND THE YEAR ROUND.

The 'media manure machines' Weisman and Sanger than write ''the IAEA has little weapons expertise''. In my personal experience with the IAEA since the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, I've had regular contacts with the IAEA and can confirm that the average IAEA inspector has more knowledge concerning nuclear weapons in their little finger than the average zionist warmonger in the whole clan.

That's is the reality, and one of the many reasons why nobody ever again should buy or read those mainstream liars: don't even use their rotten rags on the toilet, and write a letter to the editor why you think so. Media like that, and the writing rats working for those abonimable owners and terrormakers, should be ending up in court as soon as this is possible again.

QUOTE FROM AN ARTICLE PUBLISHED LAST AUGUST: "The UN's nuclear watchdog IAEA informs the FPF that Iran - abiding to the 'Non proliferation Treaty' (NPT) - which Israel always has refused to sign - is heavily controlled and inspected on a nearly daily basis, by groups of nuclear specialists of the UN's 'International Atomic Energy Agency', IAEA.

And - at least for twenty years - half a dozen US Keyhole satellites have watched every wheelbarrow, truck or train rolling in Iran, while the IAEA - to avoid more US warmongering, and trying to keep them at bay - has installed extra TV cameras for still more permanent control in IAEA inspected factories. [ ]

The New York Times - FOX, and all the other lying neocon's media will never use the figures given here: they want profitable wars.

How well inspected and controlled the nuclear capabilities of Iran for years have been and at present still are, is confirmed by Melissa Fleming, Head of the IAEA Information Dept. in Vienna. Asked by the FPF about the number of inspections on the ground done by the IAEA's inspectors in Iran, she wrote: "Please find the inspection statistics below:

FOR YOUR INFORMATION, ON TRAVEL / INSPECTION STATISTICS FOR IRAN:

Calendar days in the field spent on inspections and complementary access
(excluding related travel time): ~125 days in 2003 - and ~150 days in 2004.

Total number of trips to Iran by Dept. of SG: ~ 50 in 2003 and also ~ 50 in 2004

Some of these trips were related to the monitoring of the suspension.

[end quote IAEA]

The rest of the information you'll find here - ''UN Figures Show: US Controls Iran Permanently'' - Url.: http://www.countercurrents.org/us-henk160805.htm

It's sincerely hoped by many the world over that those jerks - which are deadly dangerous to mankind - get the same treatment as the US had for Nazi propagandists at the Trial in Nurmberg - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/9yncc

And this is how those ill famous rats at the NYT phrase their lies, advocating further misery and quagmires. They've been lying through their protruding rat's teeth all the time: why should we believe one word of what they're saying now? Selling new 'Dreck' on a by them invented new 'tack'.

December 4, 2005 - U.S. and Britain Try a New Tack on Iran

By STEVEN R. WEISMAN and DAVID E. SANGER

WASHINGTON, Dec. 3 - In a new effort to pressure Iran to allow strict controls on its nuclear program, Britain and the United States are trying to persuade Russia and China to endorse their conclusion, derived from what officials call new evidence, that Tehran intends to build nuclear weapons, American and European diplomats said. [This is a blunt lie - HR]

Until now, the effort to rein in Iran's nuclear program has occurred largely in the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations nuclear watchdog, which has described a pattern of highly suspicious behavior by Iran. [This is as true as all earlier lies to atack Iraq - none was true! - HR] - But the agency focuses on identifying possible diversions of nuclear material and has little weapons expertise.

The diplomats, who asked not to be identified to avoid any possible disruption of the delicate negotiations, say the new effort has been floated by Britain and endorsed by France and the United States, and seeks the declaration on Iran from the five major nuclear weapons powers that are the permanent members of the Security Council, which has the power to impose penalties.

The statement is the hoped-for result of arms specialists in China and Russia examining the evidence on Iran - including thousands of pages found on a laptop computer obtained by the United States last year- [bloody fakes again by the Lie Factory / CIA - HR] - and concluding, as the United States, Britain and France have with varying degrees of certainty, that it points at least to an intent to build a weapon. [andend] - How the hell can they build a weapon when every weelbarrow is checked?

Let's put it like this: without the Sangers, Weismans, and Judas Millers of this world, all the genocides, the wars and indescribable misery for millions of people all over the world would absolutely not have been possible.

BY SPREADING THEIR MANURE OF LIES, THEY PREPARED THE GROUND FOR THE BATTLE FIELDS.

IF YOU CAN STOMACH THE REST OF THE LIES BY THE NEW YORK TIMES - URL.: HTTP://TINYURL.COM/9QA26

* The NYTimes is as free-thinking and flexible as a frozen fundamentalist! - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/axnz2

* The New York Times is 'Dreck' - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/78p2b

* The Nuremberg principles: "Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment." - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/byurp

* 'The war in Iraq is illegal' - BBC: video & text-interview of the United Nation's Secretary General Kofi Annan - Url.:http://tinyurl.com/5pl2v

* The leaked 'Downing Street Memos' expose the criminal lies by war criminals like Bush, Blair, Berlusconi(It.) Balkenende(NL) - their collaborating media and other malignant ilk - Url.:http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/

* The infamous US 'Lie Factory' - http://tinyurl.com/8ncal

* Reference guide to the Geneva Conventions - Url.: http://www.genevaconventions.org

* Help all the troops of whatever nationality to come back from abroad! We need them badly at home in many countries - AND WITH ALL THEIR WEAPONS, WHICH WE PAID FOR BY TAXES - to fight with us against our so called 'governments' and their malignant managers - Url.: http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/

FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
http://forpressfound.blogspot.com/
Editor: Henk Ruyssenaars
http://tinyurl.com/amn3q
The Netherlands
FPF (at) Chello.nl

http://tinyurl.com/axnz2


CMAQ: Vie associative


Collectif à Québec: n'existe plus.

Impliquez-vous !

 

Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une Politique éditoriale , qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.

This is an alternative media using open publishing. The CMAQ collective, who validates the posts submitted on the Indymedia-Quebec, does not endorse in any way the opinions and statements and does not judge if the information is correct or true. The quality of the information is evaluated by the comments from Internet surfers, like yourself. We nonetheless have an Editorial Policy , which essentially requires that posts be related to questions of emancipation and does not come from a commercial media.