First paragraph (Teaser):

Cheney is a terrorist liar. He’s about to unleash the next 911.

Rest of the text:

HAVE A LAST STROKE & DIE (June 25, 2002 version)

A T.I.P. (Text In Progress) by

ADRIAN MORE

Hey Cheney!

On Sunday May 19 2002 you reportedly said more terrorist attack on U.S. targets were "not a matter of if, but when":
how do you know?

Because U.S. intelligence agents reportedly have intercepted Al Qaeda communications recently, pointing to 911-size or bigger attacks.

No specifics, as usual. No time, place or methods. Reportedly, you Cheney don’t know when or where. How reassuring.
Just like last summer, before 911.

An anonymous "senior administration official" told the New York Times though that the intercepted intelligence relates to Europe, the Arabian Peninsula or the U.S.
So this official is flatly contradicting you, Cheney. Because you said you don’t know where.
Your official does. Europe, Arabia, U.S.
You don’t.
Strange.

On June 23, Al Jazeera played a recording, allegedly by Qaeda spokesman Suleiman Abu Ghaith, stating that Osama is ‘alive and well’ and threatening new anti-American attacks.

I thought Bush and you, Cheney, had set out to destroy terrorists and those who harbor them.

So, why haven’t you carpet-bombed Jazeera TV? They are harboring – no, worse – they are mass-broadcasting Qaeda’s terror propaganda.

But you’ll never do that. Because Jazeera is nothing but a front for YOUR propaganda.
Nothing could help your terrorist tyranny and genocidal wars more than the "Qaeda" monster live on Jazeera.
How else can one explain the absurdity that Jazeera, a Qatar (U.S.-puppet, totalitarian state where the media are under total control) TV, would mass-broadcast terrorist stuff?

And the other absurdity that Abu Ghaith would announce to the world impending Qaeda strikes – thus risking to find the enemy on high alert and diminishing their chances of success?

All this becomes plausible ONLY IF JAZEERA + QAEDA + GHAITH + OSAMA & THE REST OF THEM THUGS ARE REALLY WORKING FOR YOU CHENEY – BECAUSE YOU AND YOUR THUGS URGENTLY NEED A NEW 911 (possibly chemical/nuclear/bio) TO JUSTIFY YOUR PLANNED IRAQI HOLOCAUST.

WHERE WILL YOU HIT THIS TIME AROUND, DICK?
EUROPE? (There’s too many anti-Iraq-war people still left there); the U.S. again? Both?

My bet is you’re going to have the next 911 performed by the end of the summer and then attack Iraq in January – a few months in between to pretend you needed time for a military buildup that’s already happening – and has been for months.

The alleged Abu Ghaith also allegedly said that "98% of Al Qaeda leaders escaped unhunt", including Osama, Zawahiri and Mullah Omar.

In other words, your war on Afghanistan Cheney has failed miserably – 98% failure rate. Why don’t you step down?
Your fellow 6-terrorist, senator Bob Graham, echoed Abu Ghaith by saying on Fox: [...] "that bin Laden is still alive... That’s best assessment of U.S. intelligence".
Graham added that bin Laden is most likely in Western Pakistan.
How the hell does Graham know where Osama is?
He chains the Senate intelligence committee. So he presumably has evidence.
In which case: HOW COME OSAMA HASN’T BEEN CAPTURED OR KILLED YET?
Senator Graham, TESTIFY!
UNDER OATH AND ON PRIME TIME FOX!

So what are you (pretending to be) doing to prevent these future Qaeda massmurders?
Your official said: "There’s just a lot of chatter in the system again. We are actively pursuing it". What does that mean?
Anyway, you Dick have already given up hope of prevention: "It’s not a matter of if, but when" you said.
You are sure it’s going to happen. You are sure it’s not preventable. God knows why.

Well, you are a liar Cheney. And a traitor.

Because if what you’re saying is true and not just a scarecrow diversion from recent attacks on Bush for failing to heed 911 warnings – then there IS something you and your henchmen could do – if you only cared:

Qaeda is reportedly being "intercepted": this implies U.S. intelligence is able to pinpoint the LOCATION of the Qaedas talking about future attacks.

How are they talking? "Interception" is the word being used by U.S. intelligence: that is, they’re eavesdropping on phone, email or radio messages.
Well, computers have IP addresses: we may know where these alleged terrorists are, or at least where they are emailing from. And who they are emailing to. Electronic surveillance of both senders’ and addresses’ mailboxes could start.
Cell-phone users are pinpointable too. And phone numbers can be monitored and connected to subscribers/owners.
Radio signals of all kinds are traceable to their sources.

I won’t even mention private analog phones because if you’re listening to those it means you’re tapping the lines so you know exactly who and where these people are.

In other words – IF YOUR AGENTS ARE REALLY "INTERCEPTING" TALKS OF QAEDAS PLANNING THE NEXT 911: WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE NOT IN JAIL YET OR AT LEAST WHY HAVEN’T YOU LOCATED WHERE EXACTLY THEY ARE CALLING/EMAILING FROM? OR HAVE YOU?
IT’S BEEN "MONTHS".

Was it snail mail or messengers? Because if that’s what you’ve been intercepting, it means you’ve made arrests or you have infiltrated Qaeda: again, you’d know exactly WHO and WHERE they are.

One more time: if you have intercepts, then you must have suspects: why are these alleged Qaedas, allegedly planning for the next slaughter of Americans, not in jail yet?

Or maybe should I ask: WHY ARE YOU, CRIMINAL DICK, AND THE REST OF YOUR GOVERNMENT OF TRAITORS AND STATE TERRORISTS NOT IN JAIL YET?

It’s not the allegedly "vague" details that "hamper defensive action" – it’s you Cheney and your cohorts.

Do us all a favor. Have a last stroke & die.

Adrian More
poet/songwriter-singer/essayist

June 25, 2002 version. I wrote the first version on May 21-22, 2002.

Sources:

1. International Herald Tribune, May 20, 2002: ‘Bush’s critics backing off on Sept.11 clues’, by Brian Knowlton, online at: http://www.iht.com/articles/58255.html
2. International Herald Tribune, May 20, 2002, p.3: ‘U.S. intercepts talks of new Qaeda attack’, by James Risen and David Johnston (The New York Times), online at: http://www.iht.com/articles/58250.html
3. International Herald Tribune, June 24, 2002, p.3: ‘Bin Laden alive and well, aide says on TV’, a compilation of AFP, NYT, AP news reports, online at: http://www.iht.com/articles/62331.html

No rights reserved. This material MAY and OUGHT be published, broadcast, rewritten and redistributed, as long as Adrian More is credited as author.