Multimedia
Audio
Video
Photo

(Un)Reasonable Search and Seizure in Québec City: Lessons from an Emerging Filmmaker

vieuxcmaq, Friday, April 27, 2001 - 11:00

Malcolm Rogge (mrogge@interlog.com)

What are reasonable grounds to search and interrogate? When does police questioning become police harassment? I travelled to Québec on the weekend of the Summit of the Americas as a member of the Toronto Video Activist Collective, and as part of a group of about fifteen independent Toronto filmmakers. I hadn’t been in Québec city for even half an hour when I was roughly apprehended by a burly RCMP officer, searched, interrogated, and treated like a suspected terrorist.

I travelled to Québec on the weekend of the Summit of the Americas as a member of the Toronto Video Activist Collective, and as part of a group of about fifteen independent Toronto filmmakers. I hadn’t been in Québec city for even half an hour when I was roughly apprehended by a burly RCMP officer, searched, interrogated, and treated like a suspected terrorist. My mistake was to arrive in Québec city at 2am, and to pull out my video camera within the still unsecured perimeter area. The protests hadn't even started, and I had already come frighteningly close to being arrested. I learned some valuable lessons about the theory and practice of reasonable search and seizure, which I’d like to share…

We had just arrived in Québec city after the nine hour drive from Toronto. Looking at the map, I could tell that we were only two blocks from the infamous "wall of shame" that surrounded the heart of the city. I started filming. The anticipation of seeing the fence reminded me of when I saw the Berlin wall for the first time in 1987. I was seventeen. I shot several rolls of film of the political graffiti that covered every square inch of the wall in downtown Berlin. Waiting to see the fence in Québec city was eerily similar to my experience of waiting to see the Berlin wall.

As our car rolled to a stop at the corner of Côte d’Abraham and Dufferin, I caught my first glimpse of the fence.

"There it is… Do you see it?"

"That’s it?! That’s all it is?" the driver replied.

A row of concrete slabs topped with a chain link fence lined the side of the road. There were no police in sight. Cars were driving along like any other night. The perimeter area was still open to traffic. As I looked at the fence, I remembered that Berlin wall started with just razor wire and wooden barricades.

We kept driving. As we turned on to Boulevard Réne Léveque, I saw a bright electronic sign: "Bienvenue au Sommet des Ameriques". I jumped out of the car, as any other documentary filmmaker would, and I began videotaping. It was a perfect shot for my film: "Welcome to the Summit of the Americas!".

As the brightly lit welcome sign switched from French to English and back again, two RCMP officers emerged from the shadows and walked quickly towards me. They shouted at me, asking me what I was filming.

"Any reason that you’re filming?"

They came right up to me. They were very fast. They began to hurl questions at me rapid-fire, hardly giving me enough time to process one question before lobbing another my way. One of the officers pushed my camera down and told me to stop filming. I kept it rolling. The burly officer told me to show him what I’d been filming. It’s not easy to keep your cool in highly tense encounters with the police, but somehow I managed to ask the right question at the right time: "Am I doing anything illegal? Am I free to go?"

They told me that I was in a secure area.

"Oh, I didn’t know that… I didn’t see any sign or anything…" I said, quite honestly. I told them we had just come around the corner and saw the electronic sign. I pointed to the sign and pronounced in my anglo-Francais: "Bienvenue au Sommet des Ameriques".

"Well take a hike" said the burly officer.

So I did. I started walking quickly towards the car, my heart racing into my throat. That was a very close call, I thought to myself. I learned my first lesson in political documentary filmmaking: if you’re not part of the corporate media, then carrying a camera is like carrying a gun—you’re automatically a suspect. Lesson two was also simple: don’t expect the cops to put up signs telling you where your not allowed to go…

As I got into the back seat of the car, I said to the driver, "Ok, let’s get going". But before I could close the door, the burly officer came up from behind and held the car door open.

"Get out of the car!" He ordered.

Needless to say I was confused, having been just told by the same officer to "take a hike". Before I could say anything else, he grabbed me by my leather jacket and pulled me out of the car. Fuck! I thought to myself, I haven’t even been in Québec City for half an hour and I was going to be arrested. He pushed me against the side of the car and took my video camera. He began to fumble with it clumsily. He looked into the viewfinder for a few seconds and then shouted out to the other officers: "He’s been filming all of our secure sites…".

He repeated this point several times.

Moments before, I had been free to go; but suddenly, I had become a suspected terrorist. I strenuously denied the accusations of filming secure sites. I told them that I had just filmed the outside of the fence as we drove around the corner.

The burly officer—whom I later learned was named officer Fedor—took the video tape and confiscated it. By this time, about six frantic RCMP officers had surrounded the car.

Officers Fedor and Scott began to interrogate me aggressively. It was scary shit, so to speak. I had to make a quick decision about whether I would insist on my legal right to remain silent—and almost certainly be arrested; or whether I should answer their questions and hope that they would eventually calm down. I had done nothing illegal, and I had no plans to engage in illegal activity. I had just arrived in Quebec. The last thing I wanted was to spend the next 24 hours in a police station, or spend five days in jail. I opted to answer their questions as truthfully as possible without compromising any other members of the group I was travelling with.

Officer Scott tried his very, very best to make me out to be a liar. I learned my third lesson: the cops will call you a liar over and over again, just ignore them, and don’t let them get a rise out of you…

They demanded to know what I was really doing in Québec. They asked me why I was filming secure sites. When I insisted that I had only filmed the outside of the fence, officer Scott asked me if I was calling them liars. I didn't answer that question. They took my wallet and searched it for my ID. They demanded to know what organizations I was a part of. That is absolutely none of your business, I thought. Legally speaking, I didn't have to answer any of their questions. But strategically, I thought it would help me if I told them that I was a member of the Liaison of Independent Filmmakers of the Toronto and the YMCA. They checked out the license plate of the car, and asked my why we would rent a car and come all the way from Mississaugua. I repeated over and over again that I was an independent filmmaker and that I was there to film the demonstrations. They called me a liar. They called me an idiot. They told me I didn’t act my age.

They kept asking me: "What are you really doing here… Why were you filming all of our secure sites? Tell us the truth…"

They were relentless.

In their eyes, I was a subversive, or even worse, a suspected terrorist. While I was being interrogated, a third RCMP officer took my backpack and searched every pocket meticulously. He emptied contents onto the back of the car. He examined my heavy battery pack. He found my filmmaking notebook and began to read it carefully. I explained that the notes were for film projects I had worked on a year earlier. One of those films was called Scar(e). He stopped on the page that said "Scar(e)" and started reading very carefully. I learned my fourth lesson for documentary filmmakers: don’t carry scripts for surrealist erotic films into potential danger zones that are crawling with cops who are trained to be paranoid…

Soon the Québec municipal police arrived. This was a lucky break. The Québec police officer actually listened to me as I tried my best to speak to him in broken French. He appeared to believe my story. He wasn’t as paranoid as the rest of the gang. But, he was a cop too, and he also searched me. He found my safety goggles in one pocket, and found my bandanna soaked in lemon juice in a zip-lock bag.

"Why do you have these goggles?" he asked.

"To protect my eyes in case of any emergency, " I replied in broken French.

"But you already have glasses," he retorted.

"Exactly," I said. "I need to protect my eyes and my glasses or I won’t be able to see anything…"

He looked at the soaked bandanna.

"Citron." I said. "Pour le gaz, si est-ce-qu’il y' a du gaz cette fin du semaine…"

He took my safety goggles and my lemon-soaked rag into his car. Meanwhile, the RCMP officers opened the trunk of the car. The burly Fedor frantically searched the entire contents of the trunk, presumably looking for anything that could be construed as a weapon, or any evidence of a sinister plot against the summit. He found my computer in the back of the trunk.

"Why do you have a computer? " he asked. I told him that I used it to do my editing.

He pulled out one of my friend’s bags and ordered me to open it.

"It’s not my bag," I stated bluntly.

He pulled the straps apart, zipped the bag open, and rifled through the clothes. Fedor stood upright triumphant when he found a gas mask and goggles buried among the clothes.

"So your making a documentary eh?" he asked sarcastically shaking the gas-mask in front of my eyes. "Why would you need these if you were just making a documentary…"

Officer Fedor seized the eye-wear and the gas-mask, adding them to the collection of articles that he had already happily confiscated from me.

Then Officer Scott turned and shouted at me: "If you just told us in the first place that you were here to demonstrate, then we wouldn’t have had to go through all of this. If you didn’t lie to us about why you were here, we wouldn’t have to have done this. You can demonstrate if you want. There’s nothing wrong with demonstrations. It’s a free country. There are things that I’d like to demonstrate about too. But why did you tell us you were making a documentary, when you’re really here to demonstrate?!"

I told him that the two activities aren’t mutually exclusive. He actually stopped talking, for just a second…

Another officer started to rummage through my bag. He pulled out the copies of my zines that I had brought with me. He held them under the streetlight and started reading them.

"Poetry," I told him.

It worked: after reading a couple of pages of my poetry, he put the zines back in my bag. Lucky for me, he didn’t look through all the zines. One of my zines is filled with satirical collage art made from images and text culled from military journals. That zine is called "Welcome to the Reagan Years: 2001" and it is dedicated to George Bush and his son George. I made the collages about two months ago after being struck by how much it felt like we were back in the Reagan years. The zine is filled with diagrams of ICBMs and advertisements for guns and tanks that come from the Canadian Military Journal. If the RCMP had seen that one, I’m quite sure that they would have taken me to jail. I learned lesson number five: don’t bring French-situationist-inspired agit-prop into red zones unless you’re planning on explaining Dadaism to a bail-hearing officer…

Officer Fedor was a bit miffed that he didn’t find anything incriminating in the trunk. He tried to slam the door shut, smashing the top of my lime green iMac. Fuck! I thought again.

"You damaged my computer," I said to officer Fedor. He pushed the computer into the back of the trunk and slammed it shut.

Then they searched the back seat of the car . One of the officers made me take out my Super-8 film camera and ordered me to play it back for him.

"I can’t," I told him, "…it’s film, it needs to be developed first."

"I think your lying to me," he said, as he grabbed the camera and examined it.

I showed him a box of unexposed film and explained to him that it was Kodak film, just like the film used in a normal film camera. I told him that I have to send it to the Kodak lab to be developed. He still didn’t believe me and called one of his supervisors.

"He says that he can’t play it back to me, but I don’t believe him," the officer said to his supervisor. They looked at the camera and tried to figure out how it worked.

"What’s on the film?" they asked again.

I told them the truth: " Beautiful construction sites in Toronto…"

They gave me back my camera and I breathed a sigh of relief. They were beginning to lose their steam, and they had found absolutely nothing to incriminate me with.

Eventually, a very high ranking RCMP officer arrived on the scene. The officers had a conference at the side of the road. Officers Fedor and Scott stood quietly on the sidewalk away from me.

After enduring almost an hour and a half of interrogation and searches, the big cheese RCMP officer came up to me. He gave me back my video-tape and the rest of the items that his underlings had seized, including the page from my notebook about my film "Scar(e)".

"You seem like nice people," the supervisor said to me. "The area has not been secured yet, and you haven’t been doing anything illegal," he continued. "But we are on full alert here though, it is a very tense situation…, so please understand…"

What he’s saying is that he'll argue in court that it was a reasonable search, I thought to myself.

"Are we free to go?" I asked.

"Yes."

"Can I get the officers’ badge numbers?"

"Yes."

I walked up to officers Scott and Fedor and asked for their name and numbers. I went up to the window of the Québec City police car and asked for the car number and the constable’s number. They were polite. There were no more insults. No more accusations. They played good cop. The interrogation was over, and now they were my friends. I wasn't a suspect anymore. Now we were "nice" people.

Maybe the shit was about to hit the fan now that the big cheese was there. Maybe they were embarrassed. Maybe they didn’t care at all. Maybe it was just practice. Maybe it was just all in fun... Maybe it was a reasonable interrogation.

I got back into the car, and we started off to Laval. Just a block away we saw another car at the side of the road surrounded by police officers. The trunk was open, and people were being searched. I learned lesson number six: This is only the beginning, we are all suspects now…

After witnessing the events in Quebec city on the weekend of the summit, I have concluded that the police really did need the wall—or something like it—to keep thousands of well-prepared protesters from spoiling the summit. A very large number of loosely organized, decentralized, and highly politically motivated protesters were determined to be heard. Some will say that the provocative actions of the protesters show that the police were justified in building the wall. We ought to remember that the East German authorities also had many official justifications for their own wall. In East Germany, the wall kept the citizens in, and sheltered them from the rest of the world. In Quebec city, the wall kept the so-called anarchists from spoiling the summit, and sheltered the international delegates from the truth about what was really going on outside the perimeter. In both cases, truth was the greatest casualty. The real question to ask is why were these walls thought to be needed in the first place...

*Malcolm Rogge is a multi-media artist and writer based in Toronto. He has written for the Texas International Law Journal, New York's BUST Magazine, the Canadian Journal of Development Studies, Toronto's KISS MACHINE, the University of Manitoba Graduate Students Newspaper, Refuge: Canada's Periodical on Refugee Studies, and Valparaíso's Journal of Third World Legal Studies. He is a member of the Liaison of Independent Filmmakers of Toronto, and the Toronto Video Activist Collective.

Real video clips from Québec by the Toronto Video Activist Collective
www.tvac.ca


CMAQ: Vie associative


Quebec City collective: no longer exist.

Get involved !

 

Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une Politique éditoriale , qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.

This is an alternative media using open publishing. The CMAQ collective, who validates the posts submitted on the Indymedia-Quebec, does not endorse in any way the opinions and statements and does not judge if the information is correct or true. The quality of the information is evaluated by the comments from Internet surfers, like yourself. We nonetheless have an Editorial Policy , which essentially requires that posts be related to questions of emancipation and does not come from a commercial media.