Multimedia
Audio
Video
Photo

The Quebec Wall

vieuxcmaq, Friday, April 20, 2001 - 11:00

Michel Chossudovsky (chossudovsky@videotron.ca)

The Summit of the Americas will be held inside a four kilometer "bunker" made of concrete and galvanized steel fencing. The 10 feet high "Quebec Wall" encircles part of the historic city center including the parliamentary compound of the National Assembly, hotels and shopping areas. Cars will enter through
closely guarded checkpoints; laissez-passers have been issued to official delegations, to the CEOs of major banks and corporations, as well as approved media and "selected invitees." (Click to see map of the "Security Perimeter" at

http://www.securitesommet.ca/pages/p_citoyen/p_cito_pe_f.html).

What lies behind the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA)?

THE QUEBEC WALL

by

Michel Chossudovsky

Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa

The Summit of the Americas will be held inside a four kilometer "bunker" made of concrete and galvanized steel fencing. The 10 feet high "Quebec Wall" encircles part of the historic city center including the parliamentary compound of the National Assembly, hotels and shopping areas. Cars will enter through
closely guarded checkpoints; laissez-passers have been issued to official delegations, to the CEOs of major banks and corporations, as well as approved media and "selected invitees." (Click to see map of the "Security Perimeter" at

http://www.securitesommet.ca/pages/p_citoyen/p_cito_pe_f.html).

Outside the bunker, more than 6,000 police and security forces are on hand,
equipped not only with "pepper spray" but also with "multi-shot" Arwen 37 guns
shooting hard-coated plastic bullets. The latter --according to a RCMP
spokesperson-- are

"… 'meant to crack a rib and put them in a lot of pain', … Tactical squads are
usually required to test such less-lethal weapons --such as Tasers, which
deliver electric shocks-- on themselves. But Toronto Police Constable
Leighton said it would be 'too dangerous' to do so with the Arwen." 1

With Canadian Armed Forces personnel dispatched to Quebec's capital from
military bases in Nova Scotia, the security apparatus in Quebec promises to
be "better organized" than at the Seattle WTO Millenium Summit in 1999. In
Seattle, the city's riot police was integrated with Gang Squads and SWAT
teams of the Tactical Operations Divisions constituting the "more militarized
components" of the police force.

By any standard this is the largest police operation in North America directed
against ordinary citizens. Rather than "cordoning off" the conference center
which is standard practice in international summits-- the Canadian authorities
have chosen to "fence in" a large part of the downtown area --not only denying
the rights of citizens to protest but also preventing residents from moving
around within their own city.

And those who defy the Quebec Wall will be taken to Orsainville penitentiary
which has been emptied of its entire prison population (including several
members of the Hells Angels) to make room for these more dangerous
"troublemakers."

THE QUEBEC WALL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Barely a week before the Summit, the Canadian and provincial governments,
the City of Quebec and Quebec City's Police force were taken to court by a
Montreal lawyer and the Vancouver based Canadian Liberty Committee (CLC).
In a signed affidavit, the Canadian government representative stated that
democracy was not under threat, to ensure:

''freedom of expression … the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International
Trade has [sent] invitations to the Summit to approximately 60 representatives
of interest groups and lobby groups." 2

Moreover, "alternative protest sites" ("sites alternatifs de manifestation") have
been designated --on the other side of the Wall-- so that the rank and file of
these same civil society organisations can do their own thing.

The "People's Summit", organized by NGOs and major trade unions-- will
receive "financial contributions for the holding of seminars, colloquia and
public meetings."3 The federal government has allocated Can$287,000-- a
comfortable amount of money, but "peanuts" in comparison to the 46 million
dollar budget allocated by Ottawa for the police operation and the erection of
the Wall.

WHO'S IN, WHO'S OUT

The official list of civil society invitees has not been made public but we have a
good idea who the "partner" civil society organizations are. The invitees include
leaders of major trade union federations as well as several CEOs of
mainstream NGOs. 4

The ritual is broadly similar to that of the 1999 Seattle World Trade
Organization (WTO) Millenium Summit. Several months ahead of time, the
WTO and Western governments had called for a "dialogue" with the leaders of
selected civil society organisations. A carefully worded AFL-CIO petition had
been drafted urging the WTO Summit to adopt "trade and investment rules
[which] protect workers' rights and the environment". In Seattle, Labor's
buzzword was to "make the global economy work for working families". 5

Similarly, last January at the global business Summit in Davos --regrouping
the World's top corporate execs, heads of State and VIPs, the leaders of some
59 "civil society" organisations --including the CEOs of Greenpeace, Oxfam
UK, Amnesty International and Save the Children Alliance-- were also in
attendance.

The ploy is to selectively handpick civil society leaders "whom we can trust"
and integrate them into a "dialogue", cut them off from their rank and file, make
them feel that they are "global citizens" acting on behalf of their fellow workers
but make them act in a way which serves the interests of the corporate
establishment:

The participation of NGOs in the Annual Meeting in Davos is evidence of the
fact that [we] purposely seek to integrate a broad spectrum of the major
stakeholders in society in … defining and advancing the global agenda … We
believe the [Davos] World Economic Forum provides the business community
with the ideal framework for engaging in collaborative efforts with the other
principal stakeholders [NGOs] of the global economy to "improve the state of
the world," which is the Forum's mission. 6

AFL-CIO's John Sweeney and Canadian Labor Congress (CLC) Ken Georgetti
--together with Bill Jordan of the International Confederation of Free trade
Unions (ICTFU)-- were also in Davos, mingling in a friendly environment with
financier George Soros, Microsoft's Bill Gates and World Bank President
James Wolfensohn. Meanwhile the rank and file protesters of these "civil
society" organisations were being beaten with clubs and assaulted with water
cannons by the Swiss riot police "outside" the Conference venue at the
"counter-Davos."

RITUAL OF DISSENT

In the New World Order, the ritual of inviting "civil society" leaders into the inner
circles of power --while simultaneously repressing the rank and file-- serves
several important functions. First, it says to the World that the critics of
globalization "must make concessions" to earn the right to mingle. Second, it
conveys the illusion that while the global elites should --under what is
euphemistically called democracy-- be subject to criticism, they nonetheless
rule legitimately. And third, it says "there is no alternative" to globalization:
fundamental change is not possible and the most we can hope is to engage
with these rulers in an ineffective "give and take".

While the "Globalizers" may adopt a few progressive phrases to demonstrate
they have good intentions, their fundamental goals are not challenged. And
what this "civil society mingling" does is to reinforce the clutch of the corporate
establishment while weakening and dividing the protest movement.

An understanding of this process of co-optation is important, because tens of
thousands of the most principled young people in Seattle, Prague and Quebec
City are involved in the anti-globalization protests because they reject the
notion that money is everything, because they reject the impoverishment of
millions and the destruction of fragile Earth so that a few may get richer. This
rank and file and some of their leaders as well, are to be applauded. But we
need to go further. We need to challenge the right of the "Globalizers" to rule.
This requires that we rethink the strategy of protest. Can we move to a higher
plane, by launching mass movements in our respective countries, movements
that bring the message of what globalization is doing, to ordinary people? For
they are the force that must be mobilized to challenge those who would
plunder the Globe.

THE FTAA: PRIVATIZATION OF A HEMISPHERE, UNDER U.S. CONTROL

The FTAA is a good deal more than a trade agreement. Throughout the
Americas, it would radically transform the social existence of sovereign
nations.

Fundamental economic, social and institutional relations would be enshrined
into a set of legally binding conditions. All public services that are at least in
part subsidized by the State, would be opened up to international tender under
the terms of the proposed clauses on "national treatment." If a government
finances health or education, this service must be opened to international
bidding. And who would bid? The large corporations would take control, all
community based facilities would be transformed into profit-making
undertakings ---schools, sports clubs, day-care centers, everything.

Moreover, the FTAA clauses would literally allow for the privatization of
municipalities. Water, sewer systems, roads and municipal services would be
owned and operated by private companies (rather than by citizens) much in the
same way as the "gated communities" in the US. More generally, the FTAA
would destroy local economies, depress wages and impoverish millions of
people. The agreement --entrenched in international law-- would annul or
invalidate national laws.

The FTAA would also allow for the privatization of water, inter-city highways as
well as entire urban areas. The FTAA would also lead to the demise of
national, regional and municipal governments.

IMF MEDICINE BECOMES PERMANENT

Moreover, under FTAA rules, the enforcement of the IMF's deadly "economic
medicine" --which has served to destroy national economies and impoverish
developing countries --would no longer hinge upon cumbersome loan
agreements, which for the governments had the advantage that they were not
"legally binding" documents.

But under FTAA rules, Latin American governments would have no political
leverage whatsoever; they would loose their "right" to even negotiate with their
creditors: the "economic medicine" would become permanently entrenched in
international law. Countries would not longer be "bonded" by external debt;
they would be permanently "enslaved" by their creditors.

CHARTER OF RIGHTS FOR CORPORATIONS

The FTAA would grant a "charter of rights" to corporations, which would not only
override national laws but would also enable private companies to sue
national governments, demand the annulment of national laws and receive
compensation for potential lost profits which result from government
regulations.

While some of these broad issues will be debated at the People's Summit,
they have not been included in the demands of trade union leaders from the
US, Canada and Latin America. Regrouped under the umbrella of the ICFTU,
The trade unions have called upon the FTAA Summit to include the usual core
labor standards, environmental and human rights clauses in the agreement.

THE AMERICAN EMPIRE

This is not a trade deal; it is the American Empire. Behind the FTAA are the
powers of Wall Street and the military-industrial complex. Ironically, while local
economies including public services would be deregulated, under the FTAA
the production of weapons of mass destruction by America's major defense
contractors would remain heavily subsidized…

Although not officially on the FTAA agenda, the militarization of South America
under "Plan Colombia", the signing of a "parallel" military cooperation protocol
by 27 countries of the Americas (the so-called Declaration of Manaus) is an
integral part of the process of hemispheric integration. US strategic interests
are at stake.

The imposition of "free" trade by Washington is an instrument of economic
conquest which serves US corporate interests as well as those of the
military-intelligence-apparatus. Trade Negotiator Richard Zoellnick --who is
slated to play a key role in Quebec City-- is part of the Bush National Security
Team working closely with National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and
Secretary of State Colin Powell.

DOLLARISATION

The deregulation of national banking institutions is part and parcel of the
Summit agenda. Supported by the Bush administration, Wall Street wants to
extend its control throughout the hemisphere, eventually displacing or taking
over existing national financial institutions.

With the help of the IMF, Washington is also bullying Latin American countries
into accepting the US dollar as their national currency. The greenback has
already been imposed on five Latin American countries including Ecuador,
Argentina, Panama, El Salvador and Guatemala.

The economic and social consequences of "dollarisation" have been
devastating. In these countries, Wall Street and the US Federal Reserve
system directly control monetary policy. The entire structure of public
expenditure is controlled by US creditors. Real wages have collapsed, social
programs have been destroyed, large sectors of the population have been
driven into abysmal poverty.

While not officially part of the FTAA Summit agenda, the adoption of the US
dollar as the common currency for the Western Hemisphere is being
discussed behind closed doors.

Militarisation and "dollarisation" are the essential building blocks of the
American Empire.

DISARMING THE NEW WORLD ORDER

With mounting dissent from all sectors of society against the FTAA, the official
Summit desperately needs the token participation of "civil society" leaders "on
the inside", to give the appearance of being "democratic." The Summit is
seeking the endorsement of these organizations in exchange for token
modifications of the Agreement, which do not put into doubt the overall
legitimacy of the FTAA nor modify substantially the workings of the proposed
free trade area.

The hidden agenda is to weaken and divide the protest movement and orient
the anti-globalization movement into areas that do not directly threaten the
interests of the business establishment and --more importantly-- which do not
raise the broader issue of Washington's political hegemony in the Western
Hemisphere.

Meanwhile, George W. Bush's trade negotiator Robert Zoellnick is preparing
fast-track legislation packaged under the "presidential trade promotion
authority", with a view to rushing the FTAA (without amendments) through the
US Congress. In other words, instating the American Empire will not be
subjected to the uncertainties of parliamentary consent.

In turn, in consultation with the AFL-CIO, the powerful Business Roundtable
(BR) and The Emergency Committee for American Trade (ECAT) --integrated
by the representatives of America's largest corporations-- are pushing the line
of the trade union bosses, they are demanding the Bush administration "to
make labor and environmental standards part of future trade talks."6

While most of the protesters who have converged on Quebec City (including
Quebec's vibrant student movement) reject the trade deal outright, the leaders
of some of the mainstream "civil society" groups want to get their human
rights, democracy, labor and environmental clauses embedded into the official
texts and then "cry victory," we've done it! 7 However, by doing this they would
not only go against their rank and file, they would also provide --without fully
realizing the implications-- legitimacy to an all encompassing process which
destroys institutions and impoverishes millions of people.

The American Empire cannot be amended; it must be rejected, fought and
defeated. The FTAA must be closed down!

ENDNOTES

1. Toronto Star, 22 March 2001.

2. Canada, Province de Quebec, District de Quebec, Cours supérieure, No.
200-05-014848-019, Affidavit de Denis Ricard, Section II, paragragh 16).

3. According to the signed affidavit, Canada, Province de Québec, op cit.

4. CLC K. Georgetti and AFL-CIO J. Sweeney are also on the guest list of the
official FTAA Summit in Quebec City. While the Council of Canadians (COC)
has stated that it will decline Ottawa's invitation, Matthew Coon Come, National
Chief of the Assembly of First Nations has accepted. Among union leaders, the
President of the Quebec's FTQ Henry Massé has accepted, while making clear
that he will also be participating (outside the bunker) in the People's Summit in
solidarity with his rank and file.

5. See AFL-CIO, "Make the Global Economy Work for Working Families",

http://www.wslc.org/wto/index.htm. , October 1999)

6. See World Economic Forum, Press Release,

http://www.weforum.org/whatwedo.nsf/documents/what+we+do?Open 5
January 2001.

7. In these Times, 16 April 2001

Related texts by Michel Chossudovsky:

Seattle and Beyond: Disarming the New World Order, November 1999 at
http://www.transnational.org/forum/meet/seattle.html.

Global Poverty in the Late 20th Century, Journal of International Affairs, Fall
1999 at http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/chossu.htm.

CBC "Commentary", on the FTAA and the likely fate of the Canadian Dollar,
CBC, 9 April 2001.

C Copyright by Michel Chossudovsky, Ottawa, April 2001. All rights reserved.
Permission is granted to post this text on non-commercial community internet
sites, provided the essay remains intact and the copyright note is displayed.
The text can also be photocopied for non-commercial distribution. To publish
this text in printed and/or other forms contact the author at
chos...@videotron.ca, fax: 1-514-4256224.



CMAQ: Vie associative


Quebec City collective: no longer exist.

Get involved !

 

Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une Politique éditoriale , qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.

This is an alternative media using open publishing. The CMAQ collective, who validates the posts submitted on the Indymedia-Quebec, does not endorse in any way the opinions and statements and does not judge if the information is correct or true. The quality of the information is evaluated by the comments from Internet surfers, like yourself. We nonetheless have an Editorial Policy , which essentially requires that posts be related to questions of emancipation and does not come from a commercial media.