|
“Committed To Healing: Involuntary Commitment Procedures”: A FraudAnonyme, Tuesday, May 6, 2008 - 11:52
geral sosbee
The law invites the ruling class, the government, the intelligence services, etc., to silence their adversaries while pretending to 'heal' them. “Committed To Healing: Involuntary Commitment Procedures” is the title of a law journal article recently published in the Texas Bar Journal, May 2008, Vol.71,No.5, and invites the public to consider paying an attorney to ‘ put someone away. ’ In my opinion the article immorally proposes a legal method to be used by the truly mentally ill in our society to threaten, torture, imprison and kill perfectly sane human beings in furtherance of financial or political interests, or in order to perpetuate a favored ideology or other egregious agenda. See: Note that the true objective of the law of involuntary commitment is not to heal, but to destroy a life ; further, those who use the law for involuntarily commitment purposes are among the most predatory, dangerous and psychopathic human beings in society.According to the article, the mental illness warnings (to be used as a factual basis for involuntary committement are as follows: 1)change in thinking, mood, or behavior In reality the above list is most probably indicative of signs of sound mental health when the Targeted individual (of the Commitment order or other predatory agenda) is pursued by the deranged relative, corrupt police or fbi/cia operatives, or other public policy stooge. See: A human being who responds to psychological and physical assaults, psychoelectronic and related assaults, or other powerful stimuli is likely to show some or all of the above so-called warning signs. See: Indeed, as I have shown in my reports, any failure to show signs consistent with the the first eight (if not all ten) of the above listed ‘signs’ may reveal a truly disturbed personality(i.e.: one incapable of adjusting to the violence directed at him often 24/7, for decades).See: The real issue that is being obscured by the legal community in the article is this: How do we as a people stop the most corrupt individuals among us (including those in powerful positions-such as those in the fbi/cia and the legal community in general ) from driving our Brothers and Sisters insane; and why do the legal professionals, the state bar administrators , and the supreme court justices around the country and at every level pretend that reports such as this one are irrelevant, delusional, or insignificant. The answer is that these so-called ‘leaders of the community’ are pitifully corrupt and at times inhumane both in their legal theories and in the applications thereof. These high rolling socialites often support (in their stupor) This report is repeatedly hacked by the fbi. To the two twirps who recorded their false allegations after reading my report, http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2008/05/375399.shtml the article is located on page 432 of the Texas Bar Journal, May 2008, Vol. 71, No.5, under the heading of the "Client Page" and is specifically addressed as, "Information For Clients Of Texas Attorneys" (in other words, to the general public). Many Indymedia groups such as San Diego Indymedia and others refuse to publish the report of this dirty Secret of American Jurisprudence because the people must be kept in the dark, lest the attorneys, judges and their predator associates in the ruling class suffer a REVOLT. In reality the laws which encourage Involuntary Commitment are nationwide and for this reason I tried to file my report around the country at different Indymedia groups. Best Wishes. geral sosbee
geralsosbeevsfbi/cia globally
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une
Politique éditoriale
, qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.
|