First paragraph (Teaser):

A Forbidden Truth dissection of the design, motivational, and operational structures of the Insane War Ritual, as practiced by the human species in the 21st century.

Rest of the text:

Wars are criminal acts of violence, undertaken not by "countries", but by individual human beings who just happen to also be supreme leaders of either an official government, or a very popular cultural/ideological movement. Lets talk about weapons for a moment. A poor person likely only has a knife, that he can use as a weapon. A wealthier person may have a gun, that he can use as a weapon. The leader of a street gang or an organized crime organization, likely has an even more useful weapon at his disposal, namely, other human beings that he can employ to commit violence on his behalf, upon his command. Now, the supreme leader of a government has the most powerful weapon of all at his disposal. No, not nuclear or biological weapons, not fighter jets or cluster bombs, or the like. He has the entire body of citizen-slaves who live within his society, at his disposal, to use as weapons. Understand that human beings are the most powerful and useful weapon of all. Within the existing dynamic of war, citizens enlisted in the military are not "soldiers". Soldiers is simply a word that has been created to cover-up the Truth. These citizens are in fact nothing more and nothing less than weapons. They are used as weapons, by the leaders of their society/government, leaders who are homicidally enraged, mentally deranged, and power-crazed, which are the reasons why and how they have sought and attained their supreme leadership positions within the society.

Leaders of societies choose to undertake wars, for either personal or political reasons. Usually for both personal and political reasons, but always for at least one of these two reasons. Personal reasons include homicidal rage, sadism, a need to overcome feelings of personal worthlessness and impotence, a desire for vengeance based upon the suppressed suffering and victimization that they, as individuals, have experienced in their pasts, mentally deranged ideological obsessions, brainwashed addictions to the god myth as well as to false perceptions of justice, and a personal obsession with attaining limitless power and control over as many human beings as they possibly can. Political reasons include a need to appease their citizen-slaves, to satiate the suppressed bloodlust of their citizen-slaves, to divert public attention from domestic problems and complaints, to terrorize their citizen-slaves into feeling as though they must support his existing regime in order to remain secure, or even to remain alive. All of these "reasons" are individual in nature, they represent the will of an individual, the leader of a government or of a major cultural/ideological movement. They are not governmental reasons. They are individual reasons, put forth by individuals who just happen to be the supreme leaders of societies/governments. You must understand this point: The soldier in a war is exactly the same as a gun, in a two-person shoot-out. In the two person shoot-out, the guns used are weapons. In a war, all soldiers are weapons. They are not human beings. They are slaves with no sentient will, being used as weapons by the insane and evil leaders of their societies.

When an individual person uses a gun to commit a crime, the gun is his weapon. The gun is not alive however, so it cannot suffer any consequences. When the leader of a government uses human beings to commit crimes, those human beings are his weapons. Those human beings are alive, they can and do suffer consequences, and therefore all governmental and ideological leaders who choose to engage in wars, are committing genocide upon their own citizens. The structure of all governments, is exactly the same as the structure of vicious street gangs and organized crime families, only on a much larger scale of malice. Governmental leaders are evil and insane, and they use their citizen-slaves as weapons, to try and cope with their own individual rage, hate, terror, obsessions, and personal need for vengeance through violence. This is a universal Truth, it is not subject to a case by case analysis. Every single leader of a society who chooses to engage in war, regardless of whether or not they claim to have been "attacked first", or to "only be defending our nation", is in reality undertaking an individual act of personal rage, simply by choosing to participate in the war. Very often in schools and workplaces, if there are two extremely enraged individuals, they will specifically seek each other out and engage in fights, because they subconsciously recognize that they can help each other to meet their own needs to express their rage and hate upon others, specifically, upon each other. This dynamic applies to national leaders as well. Leaders who are desperately eager to release their personal rage and hate, while maintaining the illusion of moral decency to both themselves and their citizen-slaves, will specifically seek each other out, and goad each other with repeated provocations, for the intentional purpose for attempting to justify declaring war, sometimes on a conscious level, other times on a subconscious level. Very often, a leader of a society will privately and literally fall to his knees in joy, either physically or psychologically, often in both ways, upon learning that another societal leader has declared war upon "his" nation. Why should such an occurrence invoke massive joy? Because it allows the homicidally enraged leader to "declare war" back, while maintaining the illusion of possessing the higher level of moral legitimacy, via a claim of "we are only defending ourselves and our way of life." It's like being given both moral and legal permission to mass murder a million human beings, literally the ultimate wet dream for a homicidally enraged human being. So, what we have are the most evil and mentally ill leaders attaining power within the most evil and diseased societies, then seeking each other out for the individual purpose of expressing their homicidal rage through war, within the illusion of moral legitimacy.

Genghis Khan, Julius Caesar, Idi Amin, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr., Osama bin-Laden, are all examples of some of the most evil, mentally ill, and homicidally enraged supreme leaders of the modern era. Although perhaps Khan and Caesar ruled a bit too long ago to qualify for inclusion in the modern era. These leaders of societies/governments deliberately sought out war with other societal leaders, for personally cathartic reasons. In point of fact, all wars are undertaken by individual leaders for either personal or political reasons, the above list simply includes the names of some of the most overtly homicidal and deranged leaders of all time.

America, england, the old soviet union, israel, germany, some of the arabian nations, some of the african nations, have been some of the primary warmongers of recent decades. This is because these countries were founded and developed along genocidally evil lines, and continue to have the most inferior and diseased societal structures in the entire world. These countries have a history of genocide, in many cases, such as america, they were founded, they came into existence, purely as the result of a genocidal attack upon a sovereign, independent society, that they chose to launch and undertake. These societies possess insane religious ideologies, and are filled with mentally deranged citizens who are obsessed with violence, rage, and vengeance, thus guaranteeing that every political leader they elect or otherwise allow to come to power, will share the same immense, suppressed homicidal rage that the average, typical, mainstream citizen feels within their True Reality. This is why we have specific wars that never seem to end, two or more societies that are ultra-diseased find each other, establish a toxic relationship with each other, and despite their claims to want to "end" the war that they are engaged in with each other, the reality is that they do not want the war to end, neither side usually wants the war to end. They, and when I say they I refer to both the supreme leaders of the society and to the average, typical, mainstream masses of citizen-slave as well, want to continue the war, so that they can cathartically shed the blood of a demonized enemy. The war ritual is almost always mutually agreeable to both parties, both governments specifically desire and choose to engage in the war ritual with each other. America had a long-time, overtly deranged war with the soviet union. When this war finally came to an end, america was not at all happy, not the citizenry and not the leadership. In fact there was extreme distress, never publicly or consciously admitted to, of course, within the insane and evil american culture, because a "favorite demon" had been lost, an imaginary demon upon whom generations of homicidally enraged americans had directed their suppressed and denied homicidal rage, while maintaining the insane illusion of moral justification and superiority. Within just a few years, american societal leaders knew they had to find other societies and other societal leaders to demonize, and so they deliberately sought out, courted war against via deliberate provocation, imposed themselves upon, and provoked "wars" with vietnam, korea, panama, iran, iraq, somalia, pakistan, and now afghanistan, among many others. That america has been by far the most genocidally warmongering nation on planet earth over the past 20 years, over the past 100 years, and over the entire history of america existing as a sovereign nation, is undeniable to any rational thinker who examines the historical facts of war.

The degree of disease that is rooted within a society, can be very accurately assessed by looking at how many wars the society has been engaged in, and for what percentage of time during their history, the society has been actively engaged in warlike activity against another society. The more wars the society is engaged in, and the larger the percentage of time they are actively engaged in war, the more perverse, diseased, and inferior the society is. America is absolutely at the head of the list, on both of these statistics. Two very important points: From a Truth-based perspective, it makes absolutely no difference which country claims to have been "provoked", which country claims to have had war declared upon it, and to only be defending itself. War is a societal policy that requires mutual agreement from both societies/countries, in order to occur. There is no way that a war can occur, unless the evil and diseased leaders of both societies, agree to engage in a war. The only exception to this rule is when an invading group of humans, usually not directly representing an existing government, but rather seeking to seize territory in order to establish a totally new regime, chooses to commit unprovoked genocide, such as the european drifters who stumbled across the north american continent chose to do. Furthermore, war is retaliatory by nature and by design, which means that unless we are talking about a government coming into existence via a genocidal overthrow of an existing societal structure, such as how america came into existence, there is no legitimacy to the argument that "the other side declared war on us, so we are only defending ourselves." If the other side did "officially" declare war upon your side, they only did so because "your" societal leader, and your society as a whole, has been goading, provoking, daring, and inciting the "enemy" societal leader and his citizen-slaves, for the specific purpose of wanting to cause a war to occur, while still trying to retain the ability to claim a moral high ground, by getting the other side to "officially" declare war first, against your society. Don't you idiots ever stop to think about why some societies/nations never seem to get directly involved in wars, for example Iceland, Costa Rica, etc... It's not because they are "worthless" countries, and it's not because they are feared by other nations, and it's not because they have superior militaries. It's because these societies are Superior societies, who refuse to participate in the "game" of war, as practiced by inferior societies. Inferior societies seek each other out, making a mutual, subconscious decision to engage in war, a decision made by the leaders of these inferior societies, to provide to themselves and to you, the homicidally enraged citizenry, the emotional pleasure and cathartic enjoyment of ritualized mass murder, genocide, and brutalization of a demonized enemy. It is a mutually agreeable decision that both inferior and diseased societies make, to engage in a war, although of course the leaders and the citizenry would both vehemently deny and ridicule this Forbidden Truth, if it was suggested to them.

Second extremely important point, we must recognize that the most evil societies of the world will be constantly engaged in either fighting actual wars, preparing to fight future wars, and demonizing other societies/countries in order to incite, arouse, and foment public support for the "next" war. The leaders of these societies have absolutely no interest in ever gaining "peace" for their society/citizenry. The thought of "peace breaking out" within their society, terrifies them. This is because they realize that their nation is filled with homicidally enraged torture victims, and unless provided with a steady diet of "demonized foreign societies" to hate and direct their rage against, societal leaders are in mortal terror that their flock of homicidal torture victims will somehow find the rationality and insight to recognize that it is their own society which deserves to be the target of their rage. At the same time, these societies still need to justify their wars on a pretense of morality and legitimacy, as well as to "claim victory" at some point in time, pretending to joyously celebrate the "end of the war", even though in reality societal leaders are already eagerly planning for and attempting to provoke a new war, as soon as they realize that the current war they are engaged in, is nearing a likely end. We must remember that governments absolutely can and do engage in genocidal wars, without ever publicly or officially admitting that they are in the middle of committing genocide via war. A perfect example of this is the 11-12 year old war that america has been undertaking against iraq. For the past 10+ years, america has been engaging in a constant, ongoing, brutally vicious war against iraq. This is a genocidal war that has been underway for over a decade as of today, the year 2001, and yet there is no genuine acknowledgment or admission within either the government, the media, or the popular culture of america, that this is an 11 year old war of almost incredibly evil genocide. At least 500,000 children in iraq, children under the age of 18, have died as a direct and sole result of the genocidal attack that america has undertaken against Iraq, over the past decade. This is deliberate, intentional, willful, child genocide. The notion that a society such as america, deliberately killing 500,000 children, within the current time frame, meaning today, as an ongoing policy, in order to satiate the suppressed bloodlust of american citizen-slaves, has any type of moral authority to even comment upon, much less try to interfere with, the policies and ideologies of other nations, is ludicrous. America is by far the most immoral, diseased, overtly malevolent, genocidal society/government on planet earth at the current time, and a wonderful argument can be made that over the past 300+ years, america has consistently held this perverse position, year after year, for the past 300+ years. America has been engaged in an utterly immoral, genocidal war against Iraq, deliberately killing 500,000+ children. And yet because the american government refuses to admit or publically acknowledge that this is a war, the pathetic, brainwashed sheeple who constitute the citizen-slaves of america, do not consider this war to be a war. Beautiful illustration here, of the literally incredible degree of stupidity and hatred of Truth, that constitutes normal thinking among you humans.

I need to emphasize just how powerful the enticement to undertake war is, among ultra-diseased societies. On one level, you have the masses of victimized, enraged citizen-slaves, constantly and desperately searching for some group of fellow human beings to demonize, hate, and direct their homicidal rage upon. On a totally different level, you have the supreme leaders of these societies, who could not have become the leaders of these societies unless they shared the same individual rage and need to cathartically direct their hate upon others, that the masses of citizen-slaves have. So, the leaders of these societies have a personal need/desire to demonize, blame, and direct homicidal rage upon, other human beings. In addition however, they also have a tremendous political need/desire to do this exact same thing. They were in fact elected, or otherwise allowed to come to power, specifically because the citizens, on a subconscious level, want, desire, and expect their leader to instruct them to direct their rage and hate against specific classes, ethnic groups, religious groups, or other societies. This is a double-tiered structure of immense insanity and evil. Even if the societal leader might be interested in trying to transcend his own personal homicidal rage, within the policy structure of how he rules the nation, it is almost impossible for him to decline to appease the immense political pressure to undertake wars, that the vast majority of all citizens within his society, are subconsciously demanding. And even if he is interesting in trying to resist the political pressure to engage in wars, he faces a tremendous emotional hurdle in terms of overcoming his own personal malice, rage, insanity, and lust for personally cathartic vengeance through violence. Now, if the leader somehow allows or chooses to specifically instruct his citizen-slaves to direct their rage and hate domestically, upon a class of people, an ethnic group, a religious group, that is living within his own society as citizens, he is taking a tremendous risk, the risk of destabilizing the entire nation, provoking riots, protests, and other domestic unrest. It is thousands of times safer for the leader, on practical, political, and emotional/moralistic levels, to incite and encourage widespread hatred and demonization of a foreign society, as opposed to a group or class of people living within his own society, because the risk of domestic unrest, the risk of a "war" erupting within his own society, is rendered virtually nil, due to the fact that the vast majority of you diseased creatures eagerly "unite" and insanely agree to direct your rage and hate upon a foreign society, ideology, or group, at the drop of a hat. You are in fact eager to accept whatever foreign demonization your societal leaders choose to provide you with, because you find it morally easier to justify directing your homicidal rage upon "foreign devils", creatures who look human, but whose perceived physical, lifestyle, religious, and ideological differences from you, are constantly being emphasized and drilled into your brainwashed, shallow minds, by your societal leaders.

In capitalistic societies especially, wars are nothing more than product commercials, of the type you see in any commercial television broadcast. You are being sold a product, the product is morally justifiable mass murder. You are the consumer, your society is the vendor. This product has to be packaged, marketed, and promoted well, the job of the commercial is to make you feel good, make you feel that this pending mass murder, which you are subconsciously desperate to experience as a way to cathartically relieve your suppressed rage and hate, is morally justifiable, legal, good, necessary, and an appropriate type of legal murder for you to embrace. Your society demonizes it's chosen "enemy" to you, trying to convince you that the enemy is evil, hurts women, hurts children, poses a threat to you and your loved ones. The reality of course is that you own society is certainly hundreds if not thousands of times more evil, causes thousands of times more harm to women and children living within your society, and poses a far greater, ongoing, daily threat to brutally victimize you, than any foreign society ever could. Your governments undertake a media and a public relations campaign, using every available tool of brainwashing and manipulation of reality perception, to demonize the chosen foreign enemy, as a trial balloon method of gauging whether or not they can foment enough consensus rage within the society, to justify undertaking and initiating an actual war against the chosen enemy society. In the vast majority of cases, assuming the societal leaders have firmly decided and determined that they wish to engage in a war with a specific enemy, they have very little if any difficulty in winning overwhelming public support for the initiation of war in a short period of time, since the vast majority of citizen-slaves are constantly filled with suppressed homicidal rage, and constantly looking for some type of a morally justified outlet for this homicidal rage, that they depend upon their evil and diseased society to provide to them. Hence we have hunting, abortion, the death penalty, euthanasia, and of course war as well, all societally legitimized forms of absolutely brutal, immoral, mass murder. In general, the more types of mass murder that a society chooses to officially legitimize and partake of, the more diseased and evil the society is. So it's no surprise that american societal leaders proudly embrace and hug to their maggot-filled bosoms war, abortion, the death penalty, hunting, etc...

Lets understand, even as we face up to the Forbidden Truth that all human societies currently in existence are evil and diseased, that there are some major differences between the most diseased societies on planet earth, and the least diseased societies on planet earth. Some societies are much more evil and diseased than other societies. Some are almost constantly engaged in war, constantly killing their own babies via abortion, constantly killing their own tortured victim-creations via a "death penalty", constantly killing other species of life that are morally superior to them for pleasure and for "sport", constantly promoting the genocidal torture of every child born into their society. This is america. Some other societies are far less deranged and diseased in structure, they almost never engage in war, they outlaw abortion, they do not murder their torture victims via a death penalty, etc... And yet even the most benign society currently in existence on this planet, still engages in genocidal murder and ritualistic victimization of it's own citizen-slaves, to some degree. It is important to recognize that there are major and significant differences between the most evil societies on earth, when compared to the "least" evil societies on planet earth. But it is even more important to understand and accept the profound Truth that every human governmental society as of today, is absolutely evil and immoral.

One of the primary ways that war is marketed and legitimized to you citizen-slaves, is as a battle between "good and evil". Your society instructs you that it is good, that you are good, and that the "enemy" that it is choosing to target is evil, and that the other society, or at the very least the soldiers fighting for the other society, are evil. This is an utterly ridiculous notion! That your society is evil, is undeniable, because all societies are evil and immoral. So, if your society was even pretending to have an interest in honesty and Truth, it would use the claim of being "less evil", rather than good and righteous. But of course we already understand that Truth, all Truth, is the mortal enemy of your societies, to be shunned, ignored, rejected at all times and in all circumstances. Regardless of whether or not a society that chooses to engage in a war might be able to make a theoretically legitimate argument that it might be somewhat "less evil" in terms of ideological policy as an abstract concept, than the enemy society, the undeniable Truth is that every society inflicts the greatest degree of harm, trauma, victimization, and suffering, upon it's own citizens. Please reread this last, red print, underlined sentence, because it is extremely important and cuts to the very heart of Forbidden Truth on this issue of war. Every society inflicts the greatest degree of harm, upon it's own citizen-slaves. Not upon the citizens of some other society or nation, but upon their own citizen-slaves. The fact that most citizens are unable to recognize, understand, perceive, and accept the fact that their own society is brutally oppressing and harming them, is a beautiful illustration of how well ideologically false societal brainwashing works for societies, in winning the blind, insane devotion of their citizens. But if we, the few of us who courageously seek Forbidden Truth, can recognize and accept the fact that "our" society deliberately inflicts far greater harm upon us than any foreign society inflicts or is interested in inflicting upon us, the entire charade upon which societies build their false legitimizations of why they need to go to war, collapses. War is marketed to all citizen-slaves, by every society, by each side, as being justified because "your" side is the good, righteous, justified side. War is marketed as a battle between a good side, your side, and a bad side, the enemy side. And yet the Truth is that there cannot be a good and righteous side because there is no good or righteous society/government on planet earth. Even more importantly, "your" side, the side which claims to be the good and righteous side, has deliberately inflicted far more harm, abuse, and victimization upon you, than the decreed "bad and immoral" enemy side has ever inflicted upon you. So how can you align yourself with the side that lies to you, is evil and immoral, and has inflicted far more harm upon you than the "enemy" side has inflicted upon you? It makes no logical sense!

The only argument left to be made, is that the "enemy" side wants to kill or torture you in a horrific way, and at least your own society is not immediately intending or planning to directly murder you outright, or physically torture you to death, so you must support this "lesser of two evils". Is there any legitimacy to this argument? No! The fact is, the "enemy" society in a war is only interested in killing or torturing you, because you are a member of the "other" society, the society that has declared war upon them and from their perspective, is trying to torment and kill them. If you were to choose to "defect", to sincerely abandon your current society/government, renounce your current government, and place yourself at the mercy of the "enemy" society, you likely would not be killed. You might well have to adopt to a different lifestyle, you certainly will suffer and be victimized to a degree by your "new" society, but if you can open your blind eyes, you would see that you are already being brutally victimized by your current society/government, and so the victimization that your new society/government would inflict upon you, would be nothing new and more than likely comparable to or milder than the level of current victimization you are experiencing. Even the nazi's, whose entire ideological doctrine was built upon racial superiority, would not have likely genocidally murdered the members of societies that their ideological doctrine decreed to be inferior, if these people, as individuals, would have sincerely embraced and honored the nazi regime, the nazi ideology, and nazi leaders. Yes, they likely would have made these people work at menial jobs, in slave-labor situations, but every government and every societal leadership group, is more interested in winning over the sincere, loyal devotion of as many human beings as it can, than it is in murdering them. It can only justify murdering them, if it can philosophically argue that the foreign society or group poses a threat to them. Rejecting the legitimacy and the claims of superiority of the regime, obviously meets this threat criteria. The bottom line is, there is no government or society worth "going to war" for, worth trying to defend and risk your life for, because every society is evil and immoral, and your own society has inflicted far more harm upon you personally, than the "decreed enemy" society has already, or is likely in the future, to inflict upon you. In point of fact, your own society is threatening to murder you, needlessly endangering your life, clearly increasing the chances that you will be murdered, when it instructs/compels you to join it's military and fight in a war.

Lets understand that if two societies declare war upon each other, and one side captures either "enemy" soldiers or civilians from the other side, it is very likely they will try to use their captured enemy humans as bargaining chips and may torture/murder them, as a way to send a message and make these members of the demonized enemy examples of what the other members of the enemy, who are still trying to mass murder their side, will face. This is perfectly natural and does not contradict the fact that the "enemy" society only kills you, because you, or members of your society, are overtly and currently involved in an effort to kill members of their society, and in fact to totally destroy their society and government, in most cases. Of course it is "unfair" for the enemy society to murder you, if you sincerely renounce the society that is attacking them, and sincerely align yourself with their society. But even under these circumstances, you need to understand that it is your own society/government that is primarily to blame, because your society chose to engage in a genocidal war against this enemy society. In many cases of course, sincere defectors are welcomed with open arms, even by the enemy, even in an ongoing war, even if the defector was a citizen of and member of the very government and society that is continuing to attempt to destroy their society and government. Understand this fundamental Truth: Your society and government has deliberately harmed and victimized you. It is evil and immoral. It does not deserve your support, loyalty, or allegiance, much less to gain control of your physical body and mind, for the purpose of getting you to try and murder complete strangers on it's behalf, via the diseased war ritual. And you have no legitimate moral, ethical, ideological, or intellectual right or reason to align yourself with the society that has victimized you more than any other society, or to agree to mass murder complete strangers on behalf of this evil society. Understand that in all my comments above, I am not singling out any society or government. All of the above Truths are equally applicable, for example, for members of american society, members of afghanistan society, members of finland society, etc... The personal right to commit individual, True Reality based murder that involves personal choice that carries no "orders" or instructions or directions from your society, is far more morally legitimate, rational, and personally justifiable, than the decreed "right" that your society gives you, to mass murder specific, complete strangers. on it's behalf, via the insane structure of war. The above Truth is not an "advocacy of murder", it is a declaration of Truth. No society that chooses to practice and engage in war, has any morally legitimate legal authority to condemn or punitively punish individual citizen-slaves who may commit "unsanctioned" types of murders, because war itself is a totally immoral and unjustifiable form of murder, and it is not only decreed legal, but overtly practiced by most societies and governments, particularly within the most evil and diseased of societies.

Now, lets be clear on the fact that leaders of human governments/societies are themselves tortured victim-creations, of the societies that they are born into and raised up within. Even though the policies and doctrines of governments and societies absolutely must be seen and declared to be evil and perverse, no such labels should be applied to individual human beings who happen to be leaders of governments and societies. They are victims themselves, and they deserve no personal condemnation or demonization of any kind. All criminals are victims of society. Leaders of governments are criminals, they undertake criminal, immoral acts, in reflection of their own True Reality and the maliciously immoral design structure of their societies, that has been imposed upon them and implanted within their conscious and subconscious perceptions of reality. They are not to blame, as individuals. They must be seen and treated as being the victims of society that they are. The fact that they have assumed leadership positions within the society, in no way negates their status of being created torture victims of society. The criminal deserves absolutely no personal condemnation or punitive punishment. Society creates all of it's criminals, and bears equal responsibility for each and every created victim, there is no legitimacy to the notion that a criminal who happens to become a supreme leader of a society, loses some or all of his victimhood status. Nobody and nothing can strip a victim of his True Reality, of being a victim.

It is no surprise that the vast majority of individuals who become supreme leaders are obsessed with their images. They are power-crazed, desperately eager to exert domination and control over others, while at the same time equally desperate to shape and mold all public perceptions of their image. In particular, they are determined to extinguish and destroy any hint of personal vulnerability or victimization, from their public image, persona, and known life history. This is why you almost never read or hear about the childhood victimization, in fact torture, that virtually all societal leaders throughout all of human history, including in the present time of course, have been subjected to. Just as virtually all children try to keep their abuse and victimization secret, especially if committed by Sacred Family Unit members, politicians, aspiring politicians, and all societal/governmental leaders go to incredible efforts and lengths to hide the facts of their abuse and victimization, throughout their entire lives, even after they leave public office, in the case of elected leaders. Nevertheless, the fact remains that all societal leaders are victims of extreme childhood abuse and trauma. It takes a tremendous amount of journalistic effort to uncover such facts of abuse, and with some supreme leaders, the abuse is never uncovered. So I wish to extend my extreme thanks to the investigative reporters and journalists who have gone the extra mile to uncover some of the facts listed below, while at the same time I must of course condemn the mainstream media mercilessly, for failing to properly air, report upon, and focus upon the individual facts of supreme leader abuse listed below, as well as the psychologically and intellectually valid Truth of how societal leaders undertake wars as a way to claim personal, cathartic vengeance for the suffering, abuse, trauma, and victimization that they themselves have personally endured, in their lives. I will be providing several reference URL's, for the below quotes, after listing the quotes themselves.

"Bill Clinton's alcoholic father was so violent toward his mother that Clinton recalls him firing a gun at his mother when he was five, and little Billy twice had to stop real violence when Roger threatened to kill Virginia. His stepfather physically abused him during his drunken rages, and his grandmother, who was his primary caretaker in his early years while his mother was elsewhere, had a "fierce temper" and undoubtedly used a whip on him as she had done on his mother when she was a child. Besides this physical abuse, Clinton was also a rejected child, whose mother left him as an infant for two years with her mother while she moved to another city to learn nursing and then routinely left him while she gambled as he grew up. "I was raised in that sort of culture where you put on a happy face, and you didn't reveal your pain and agony," Bill Clinton said.

With John F. Kennedy there was an intimate emotional link between his sexual addiction--requiring almost daily conquests of mistresses and prostitutes--and his equally compulsive need for military conquests. The same is true of Clinton. He has many of the characteristics of what Robert Tucker calls the "warfare personality"--self-dramatization, extreme narcissism, repeated feelings of conspiracies against him by enemies and an ability to call for a great Crusade that will defeat Evil abroad and cleanse the world of its sinfulness. I would only add to these: a deep well of loneliness, frequent revenge fantasies and an ability to dissociate. It should not have surprised us when he ordered the Cuban invasion and risked incinerating millions of Americans with Russian nuclear missiles during his Cuban embargo, saying, "If Khrushchev wants to rub my nose in the dirt, it's all over." In fact, it turns out that it was Kennedy's taunting of the Russians with a 1962 "practice invasion" exercise near Cuba that actually pushed Khrushchev into putting his missiles into Cuba in the first place. A typical case of provoking an enemy can be shown for the actions of John F. Kennedy in the Cuban Missile Crisis, which we earlier examined briefly. JFK's childhood was typically abusive, dominated by his mother's emotional distancing of him--"She was never there when we really needed her...[She] never really held me and hugged me. Never."--and her brutality, battering John with "hairbrushes, coat hangers, belts and shoes [and] once slapping young Bobby's face so viciously that she punctured his eardrum and split his lip." The result in JFK was a phallic-narcissistic personality focused on conquering women in daily assignations and a lifetime of venereal disease [and] a steady diet of mood-altering drugs. Claiming a mythical "missile gap" with the Russians, Kennedy was elected President to "get America moving again" after the peaceful Eisenhower Fifties, and soon authorized the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba over the objections of most experts who said it would fail, telling his aides he "wasn't going to be ‘chicken.'" The resulting failure was taken by him as a personal humiliation, for which he needed revenge. He authorized Operation Mongoose, various assassination attempts against Castro, including using the Mafia, but success evaded him. By 1962, Kennedy decided to regain his potency by invading Cuba with U.S. forces. He told the military to prepare for a U.S. invasion of the island and asked his staff to formulate a pretext that would give an appearance of a Cuban attack on a U.S. airline that would justify it. But war with a small neighbor would not be enough; Kennedy moved to make certain the Russians would be involved in the war. On January 31, 1962, he asked Khrushchev's son-in-law, Aleksei Adzhubei, to meet with him and, in order to humiliate the Russians as he felt humiliated, told him he was preparing to attack Cuba like Russia attacked Hungary. Despite the fact that 100 million Americans lay in the range of the Russian missiles--and despite the opinion of his staff that they made no military difference at all because nuclear missiles on Russian submarines had long been stationed a few miles off Cuba--Kennedy instituted a naval embargo and prepared for a full-scale attack on Cuba, risking a nuclear World War III. Saying "If Khrushchev wants to rub my nose in the dirt, it's all over" and "we must not look to the world as if we were backing down," Kennedy fully expected war. When his staff told him there were diplomatic means which could be used to remove the missiles, he replied, "The object is not to stop offensive weapons, because the offensive weapons are already there, as much as it is to have a showdown with the Russians of one kind or another." Since Kennedy had already publicly declared the U.S. was "prepared to use nuclear weapons at the start" of any war, Kennedy's embargo and invasion would mean nuclear war if the Russians didn't accept the humiliation and back down, "one hell of a gamble," as Kennedy put it. Luckily for mankind, Khrushchev backed down, was removed from office because of the humiliation and America was rescued from its self-inflicted humiliations. For his role in hiding the real cause of the near-apocalyptic actions, President Kennedy remains universally seen as one of America's greatest Presidents...because he "kept his head" during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

We know that as a boy Adolf Hitler was tormented, humiliated and mocked by his father, without the slightest protection from his mother. We also know that he denied his true feelings toward his father. The real sources of his hatred thus become obvious. I had gone in search of the true motives not only for Hitler's mental make--up but also that of many other dictators. In all of them I identified the effects of hatred of a parent that remained unconscious not only because hating one's father was strictly prohibited but also because it was in the interests of the child's self--preservation to maintain the illusion of having a good father. Only in the form of a deflection onto others was hatred permitted, and then it could flow freely. For Adolf Hitler's father, the suspicion that he might be of Jewish descent was insufferable in the context of the anti--Jewish environment he grew up in. All the plaudits he earned himself as a customs officer were insufficient to liberate him from the latent rage at the disgrace and humiliation visited on him through no fault of his own. The only thing he could do with impunity was to take out this rage on his son Adolf. According to the reports of his daughter of his former marriage, Angela, he beat his son mercilessly every day. In an attempt to exorcise his childhood fears, his son nurtured the maniac delusion that it was up to him to free not only himself of Jewish blood but also all Germany and later the whole world. Right up to his death in the bunker, Hitler remained a victim of this delusion because all his life his fear of his half--Jewish father had remained locked in his unconscious mind. I can certainly picture the boy Hitler swearing vengeance on "the Jews," those monstrous fantasy--figures of an already diseased imagination. Consciously, he probably thought he could have led a happy life if "the Jew" had not plunged his grandmother into the disgrace that he and his family had to live with. And it was this that in his eyes served to excuse the batterings he received from his father, who after all was himself a victim of the evil and omnipotent Jew. In the mind of an angry, seriously confused child, it is only a short step from there to the idea that all Jews should be exterminated. In the household of Hitler's family lived for years the very unpredictable schizophrenic aunt Johanna whose behavior is reported to be very frightening to the child. As an adult, Hitler ordered to kill every handicapped and psychotic person to free Germany society from this burden. Germany seemed for him to symbolize the innocent child who had to be saved. Consequently, Hitler wanted to protect his nation from the dangers he himself had had to face. Absurd? Not at all. For an unconscious mind, this kind of symbolization might sound very normal and logical. Hitler's childhood had been so abusive-his father regularly beat him "with a hippopotamus whip," once enduring 230 blows of his father's cane and another time nearly killed by his father's whipping that he was full of rage toward the world. When he grew up, his sexual feelings were so mixed up with his revenge fantasies that he believed his sperm was poisonous and might enter the woman's bloodstream during sexual intercourse and poison her.

Mao Tse-Tung had been regularly whipped by his father and later sent 30 million people to their deaths, but he hardly ever admitted the full extent of the rage he must have felt toward his own father, a very severe teacher who had tried through beatings to "make a man" out of his son.

Joseph Stalin caused millions to suffer and die because even at the height of his power his actions were determined by unconscious infantile fear of powerlessness. Apparently his father, a poor cobbler from Georgia, attempted to drown his frustration with liquor and whipped his son almost every day. His mother displayed psychotic traits, was completely incapable of defending her son and was usually away from home either praying in church or running the priest's household. Stalin idealized his parents right up to the end of his life and was constantly haunted by the fear of dangers that had long since ceased to exist but were still present in his deranged mind. The same might be true of many other tyrants. The groups of people they singled out for persecution and the rationalization mechanisms they employed were different in each case, but the fundamental reason behind it was probably identical. They often drew on ideologies to disguise the truth and their own paranoia. And the masses chimed in enthusiastically because they were unaware of the real motives, including those operative in their own biographies. The infantile revenge fantasies of individuals would be of no account if society did not regularly show such naive alacrity in helping to make them come true.

Even though Ronald Reagan always tried to avoid talking about his father to interviewers-one biographer said that when asked about his family life he would "talk nonstop about his mother" but never mention his father -he relates in the autobiography how as a child he would be "pretending sleep" during his father's "week-long benders," and how he would "fill myself with grief for my father" when he found him "spread out as if he were crucified" on the front porch. The father, a violent Irishman, who was later described by his son as having lived a life of "almost permanent anger and frustration," used to kick young Ronald "with his boot" and often "clobbered" him and his brother. His overwhelming fear of his father made young Ronald a "good" boy, a "loner," who was "afraid of the dark," someone who suffered since childhood from various phobias, or irrational fears of various kinds. The first phobia he mentions in his autobiography is his fear "to the point of hysteria" of being piled upon by "the mass of writhing, shouting bodies" in a football game. Although he always loved the physical violence of football-enjoying the "clean hatred. . . where two men can literally fling themselves bodily at one another in combat"-he said he always panicked when he felt trapped by the pileup. His claustrophobia, his fear of being trapped in an enclosed space, was a "lifelong" problem, he told one biographer. Most of the time it indicated fears of physical closeness, usually with men, as when he had a "claustrophobia problem" when filming a movie in a submarine in close quarters with other male actors. By 1947, Reagan's despair about his life reached its climax. He began carrying a loaded pistol-ostensibly, he said, as protection against mutilation threats, but also as a return to his earlier having owned guns as a child and in his twenties. He let his physical condition run down so badly he came down with pneumonia, went to the hospital and became aware that he wanted to die. His guilt at outliving his father, his conviction that his wishes had actually killed him, had grown to such a point that only the ultimate punishment, his own death, would suffice. At that moment on the hospital bed, he was thrown back to his childhood, when he sometimes used to feel so depressed that he wished for death, once writing a poem extolling death as a salvation from "life's dreary dirge." If a devoted nurse had not coaxed him to continue breathing, he said, he would have quit living then and there. As for many Americans, anti-communism was for Reagan a perfect solution for his parricidal wishes. It solved the problem of his guilt for his father's death by putting his disturbing wishes into the communists. Without being consciously aware of why, he found that his new anti-communist activities made him feel better, saying to himself, in effect, "It's not me who wants to kill daddy. It's the commies who want to destroy all authority. And if I fight them, I'll be able to control my own wishes in them." Ronald Reagan's childhood was more like that of most presidents: a nightmare of neglect and abuse, in his case dominated by an obsessively religious mother and a violent, alcoholic father who, he said, used to "kick him with his boot" and "clobber" him and his brother. The result, as I have documented in my book, Reagan's America, was a childhood of phobias and fears "to the point of hysteria," buried feelings of rage and severe castration anxieties (the title of his autobiography was Where Is The Rest of Me?). As an adult, Reagan took to carrying a loaded pistol, and once considered suicide, only to be saved by the defensive maneuver of taking up politics and becoming an anti-communist warrior, crusading against imaginary "enemies" who were blamed for the feelings he denied in himself.

George Bush's childhood, (This refers to the ex-president, George Bush Sr.) was also full of fear and punishments. Psychohistorian Suzy Kane, interviewing George's brother, Prescott, Jr., discovered that Bush's father often beat him on the buttocks with a belt or a razor strap, the anticipation of which, Prescott, Jr. recalled, made them "quiver" with fear. "He took us over his knee and whopped us with his belt," Prescott said. "He had a strong arm, and boy, did we feel it." As he admitted to Kane, "We were all scared of him. We were scared to death of Dad when we were younger." Childhood classmates of George described his father as "aloof and distant...formidable and stern...very austere and not a warm person." "Dad was really scary," George himself once admitted. As a result, a desperate need to please was George's main trait as a child, and a depressive personality with an overwhelming need to placate became his trademarks as president. President Bush soon began to sense that he was being sent unconscious messages that a new war had to be found soon. His masculinity began to be questioned. He began to be pictured by cartoonists wearing a dress and was referred to more often as a "wimp." Cartoons began showing him being attacked and devoured by monsters. He sensed the nation's distress and rage, and decided he had better act soon. In such a peaceful post-Cold War world, where could he find an enemy crazy enough to be willing to fight the most powerful military force on earth, yet small enough for us to defeat easily? Since it is the task of a leader to provide enemies when required, Bush was not about to be caught short when his nation asked him to find an enemy. The arming of Iraq was a 15-year love affair for America. Saddam Hussein was our creation, our monster. We built him up and then tried to take him down. Elements of these childhood traumas can be seen in the Gulf War. Since George Bush had been beaten on his posterior during childhood, he threatened to "kick the ass" of Saddam Hussein. Many Americans, who had also had their posteriors beaten during childhood, multiplied the image: "Kick Ass" T-shirts, flags and belt buckles flooded the country; Americans told reporters they wanted to "whip that guy's butt" and "get him with his britches down"; and cartoons showed the U.N. building decorated with the words "KICK BUTT."

Saddam Hussein, like so many dictators, had an unbelievably traumatic childhood. His mother tried to abort him by hitting her abdomen with her fists and cutting herself with a kitchen knife, yelling, "In my belly I'm carrying a Satan!" She gave the infant Saddam away to his uncle, a violent man who beat the boy regularly, calling him "a son of a cur" and training him to use a gun and steal sheep. Saddam committed his first homicide at eleven. His political career centered on the murder of his fellow countrymen, and he particularly enjoyed watching the torture and execution of officers who had fought with him. Saddam would obviously make an ideal enemy to whom America could delegate the task of starting a new war so that we could remain guiltless. Saddam Hussein, for his part, saw the coming war in terms of the typical childhood traumas he and his countrymen had experienced. For instance, most male Iraqis endured a bloody, terrifying circumcision around the age of six, and Saddam used metaphors that reflected fears of bloody castration, saying that it was Iraq's mission to "return the branch, Kuwait, to the root, Iraq" and vowing Americans would be made to "swim in their own blood." It was his mission, he said, to return to Iraq "the part that was cut off by English scissors."

Please note that a few words and punctuation marks from the above quotes have been slightly modified by me, in order to provide proper grammatical and sentence structure flow, but none of the meaning or message of any quote has been affected by these tiny word modifications. Once again, my extreme thanks go out to the journalists, historical researchers, and writers who have managed to uncover the above facts of abuse concerning the supreme leaders mentioned, which I am sure represent only the tip of the iceberg insofar as the additional tortures that each of these leaders, as well as virtually all other supreme leaders of societies throughout the history of the human race, have endured. The above quotes come from essays that can be accessed at the following URL's:

The Clinton Scandals and the Yugoslav War as Purity Crusades
The Political Consequences of Child Abuse
The Making of a Fearful Leader
The Gulf War as a Mental Disorder
Restaging Early Traumas in War and Social Violence
War as Righteous Rape and Purification

I want to make it clear that while I am extremely impressed with many of the theories, ideas, and insights of Truth that are expressed and revealed in the essays at the above URL's, and I absolutely agree with and share some of the conclusions and insights that are reached, nobody should assume that I agree with or find accurate any specific conclusion or theory that is found within these essays. These essays were not written by me, and although I find them valuable and agree with parts of the ideology expressed in these essays, I also totally disagree with and reject other portions of the theories and ideologies. Therefore none of you have any right to assume that I agree with the ideology expressed in any part of these essays, nor should you assume that any of these essays represent Forbidden Truth. Only the essays contained at this original website, that I am authoring, represent Forbidden Truth.

The quotes above are fairly lengthy, but I feel they are extremely valuable for any seeker of Truth. We see above that the supreme leaders of societies, throughout history and today as well, especially those who are most eager to participate in mutually agreeable war, were and are victims of extreme childhood trauma, torture, and brutal victimization. They are mentally ill, justifiably enraged, tortured victim-creations of their societies, and they chose to undertake wars for the primary purpose of alleviating their own personal, internal, emotional rage, hate, terror, and distress. They used the members of their societies as weapons, living, breathing, human weapons, to commit genocide and mass murder on their behalf. Understanding this Truth, it is up to you, as Superior individuals, to condemn your societal leaders, to refuse to accept their leadership over you, to refuse to serve as sacrificial lambs for their mental derangements. The problem is, you diseased creatures share the same torturous childhoods, the same mental derangements, the same total lack of ability to recognize and understand your own internal motivations and perverse impulses of self-sacrifice and self-destruction, that rule the True Realities of your genocidal supreme leaders. The only "solution" to this problem, is the embrace of Truth. Since there is no chance that any significant number of you diseased creatures will find the inspiration or ability to embrace Truth, you will continue, just as you have done over the past few years, to choose to empower homicidally deranged individuals to be your supreme leaders, and they in turn, will continue to commit genocide for both their own personal cathartic pleasure/relief, and to appease your suppressed homicidal rage and hate, that you are desperate, on a daily basis, to find a societally sanctioned release for.

In the above quotes, we learn, beyond all doubt, that Bill Clinton, John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr., Mao Tse-Tung Saddam Hussein, Joseph Stalin, and Adolf Hitler, all supreme leaders of societies, were all brutally tortured and victimized when they were children. As supreme leaders, they all chose to provoke and participate in genocidal wars, and they did so for both personally cathartic, and politically beneficial reasons. Regardless of whether you accept all of the psychological theories that are contained within the six Psychohistory essays that can be accessed via the above URL's, it is undeniable, to any sane thinker, that all human beings reflect their True Reality, in their adult life choices and life paths, and that this True Reality is based primarily upon the sum total of their personal life experiences, most especially their childhood experiences. Drawing upon the Truths of war that I have already revealed above, those of us who can think sanely and in a Superior manner, see that each of these leaders was absolutely mentally ill, as well as overtly malevolent, in terms of the political policies and agendas of deliberate genocide that they chose to pursue and undertake, during the time that they held their supreme leadership positions. As an example, lets look at the leader who is probably considered the "best", the most benevolent, of all that are listed above, John F. Kennedy. This man was mentally ill and homicidally enraged. He viewed the presidency as nothing more than a platform from which he could claim violent vengeance for the abuses and victimization that he experienced as a child, and the life frustrations and emotional obsessions he was experiencing as an adult. This man, John F. Kennedy, chose to try to provoke and initiate war, with both cuba and russia. His actions were completely irrational and genocidally evil. Because of his mental illness, he perceived the leaders of cuba and russia to be bullies who posed a threat to his manhood, as an individual. He cared not an iota about his citizen-slaves, he gave their safety, welfare, best interests, and lives, not an iota of rational concern or attention, in his actions, in his attempts to provoke a genocidal war. He repeatedly taunted and dared the supreme leaders of these two societies, desperately trying to get them to declare war upon america, so that he could have the pretense of "moral justification", to indulge in an orgy of bloodletting, using american children, so-called "soldiers", as his weapons. This mentally ill supreme leader deliberately provoked two other supreme leaders, for no valid reason, absolutely increasing, to a huge degree, the possibility that every single american citizen-slave would be murdered via a nuclear holocaust, as a direct result of his own personal, irrational, insane, overtly malicious and provocative actions as the president of the united states of america. This man overtly tried to murder Fidel Castro, the supreme leader of a tiny and essentially helpless nation, this man deliberately undertook actions and policies, as president, which greatly increased the likelihood of every single american citizen being killed via a nuclear holocaust, and yet he is considered to be one of america's most beloved and "best" presidents. This insane man came closer than any other supreme leader in the history of the world has come, to personally initiating a nuclear war that would have killed hundreds of millions of people at a bare minimum, and possibly would have extincted the entire human race, by deliberately provoking, humiliating, taunting, and bullying the supreme leader of the soviet union, for no valid reason of any kind. Only because the soviet union supreme leader, as an individual, was Superior and sane enough to be willing to accept the bullying and humiliation, most likely recognizing that he was dealing with a mentally deranged John F. Kennedy, were hundreds of millions of lives saved, and possibly the human race itself, saved from extinction. How utterly perverse it is that the american populace knows, and the historical record reveals, absolutely no trace of this remarkable Truth, and instead John F. Kennedy is perceived within the popular culture as being a good man, a good president, a sane and superior Supreme Leader. And on top of everything else, Nikita Khrushchev, the then supreme leader of russua, who literally "saved the world", or at least saved hundreds of millions of human lives, by refusing to allow John F. Kennedy to provoke and goad him into agreeing to engage in a war, was thrown out of power by the pathetically inferior, bloodthirsty citizen-slaves of his society, for daring to have refused to satiate their homicidal bloodlust, via a war, as they wanted him to do. Any supreme leader of a diseased society who refuses to provide wars, to his homicidally enraged citizens, faces the likelihood of both losing his own job of supreme leader, and having his country plunge into internal strife, increased crime, civil war, as his diseased and deranged citizens demand and seek out some type of outlet for their suppressed homicidal rage.

I'm not going to offer additional detailed commentary on all the other supreme leaders listed above, since the facts of their victimization, and the reality of how they chose to initiate and engage in genocidal wars, speak for themselves. It is utterly outrageous that such mentally ill torture victims are empowered by you citizen-slaves, to serve as your supreme leaders. But is it surprising? No! Because the vast majority of you citizens have endured just as much brutality, victimization, injustice, and you deliberately seek out a supreme leader who shares the same mindset of suppressed but very real homicidal rage, that you feel at your True Reality emotional cores. I now want to expand and deepen some of the primary Forbidden Truths that I have already revealed, and branch them out further. One very interesting issue to explore, is how societal leaders are oftentimes absolutely determined to both provoke and sustain a war. In the John F. Kennedy example detailed above, we see the absolute determination of John, to provoke a war with cuba and russia. Even when told that the "dispute" could likely be settled via diplomatic means, negotiation, compromise, etc..., your homicidally enraged president declared: "The object is not to stop offensive weapons, because the offensive weapons are already there, as much as it is to have a showdown with the Russians of one kind or another." He is saying, in deceitful language of course, since all supreme leaders are professional liars, "I want a war. I want a war at all costs. Nothing and nobody will stop me from having the war that I want." This is an extremely common theme within all wars, an absolute determination by at least one of the supreme leaders, to both provoke and maintain a war. An excellent example of this is occurring right now, in the year 2001. The president of the united states, George Bush, is homicidally enraged, he senses that his citizen-slaves are homicidally enraged as well, and he is therefore determined to engage in a lengthy, extremely deadly war against afghanistan. Every public statement that he has made, is designed to make it impossible for the supreme leaders of afghanistan to avoid being genocidally mass murdered. Incredibly, he is refusing to negotiate with the afghani supreme leaders, even though it is clear to any rational observer that the supreme leaders of afghanistan are in fact eager to negotiate and eager to cut short this war! George Bush is the warmonger here, the Taliban supreme leaders have in fact tried, at every turn, to head off this war, while still maintaining a shred of dignity and respect for themselves, as well as to naturally retain their power and positions of being supreme leaders. George Bush has deliberately made it impossible for the Taliban to choose a peaceful way out, because he is determined to satiate his own homicidal rage, as well as the homicidal rage of american citizen-slaves, for both personal and political gain and benefit.

Why does George Bush refuse to negotiate with the Taliban? Why does he refuse to provide them with the evidence they ask for? Why does he mock and reject all suggestions by the Taliban that through negotiation, they might be willing to put Osama bin-Laden on trial themselves, or hand him over to an international court, or possibly even hand him over to the american judicial system, if enough evidence of his guilt is produced and presented?? Why does he deliberately humiliate and insult the supreme leaders of Afghanistan on a daily basis? It is because George Bush is determined to commit genocide, he is determined to satiate your homicidal rage, if you happen to be an american citizen. He is determined to steer clear and avoid like the plague, any peaceful solution to the situation. He is deliberately provoking, humiliating, bullying the supreme leaders of afghanistan in a merciless manner, in order to make certain that no peaceful resolution can possibly occur, while at the same time mercilessly blaming and demonizing the Taliban so as to retain a maximum illusion of moral justification, as he undertakes his genocidal attacks. How can any sane thinker accept George Bush's official, undeniable decree that he is "unwilling to negotiate for peace" with the supreme leaders of the society that he has declared war upon, without recognizing that such a decree proves that George Bush is determined to maintain and to increase this war, resulting in genocidal death and murder? The Taliban are willing to negotiate for peace. America is not willing to negotiate. And yet 99.999999% of all american citizen-slaves insanely perceive america as holding the moral high ground, america as being the seeker of "peace", even as america continues to massacre essentially helpless and defenseless human beings, who pose no threat of any kind to americans, on american soil, as individuals. George Bush is terrified of the possibility that the Taliban might hand over to an international court, or put on trial within their own judicial system, Osama bin-Laden. This possibility absolutely terrifies him, because he realizes that it might remove some of the bloodlust fervor that is passionately gripping him and his citizen-slaves. It might reduce public support for the genocidal war that he has successfully promoted and legitimized to his brainwashed citizen-slaves. Therefore, he made a tactical decision to make it literally impossible for the Taliban to even criticize, much less hand over, Osama bin-Laden. He did this by refusing to negotiate with the Taliban, demonizing the Taliban at every turn, calling them evil criminals, proudly announcing that they will be overthrown by force in this war that he is launching upon them. This leaves the Taliban no choice but to embrace essentially their only somewhat powerful ally and supporter, Osama bin-Laden, thus setting the stage for yet another genocidal war initiated by america, the most evil and diseased society on planet earth.

We can use this same war to delve further into the issue of "the other side started it!" Lets look at the facts: On September 11, 2001, in the country of america, 19 individual human beings deliberately crashed four airplanes, in an attempt to kill as many human beings as they possibly could. There was absolutely no claim or declaration of "war", of any kind, made. A day or so later, the president of america publically declared, via the media, that "an act of war, war itself, has been declared upon us, upon america." But in reality nobody had made any such declaration! George Bush simply lied, because he wanted to declare war against Afghanistan. He was unwilling to declare war first, recognizing that this might slightly reduce the illusion of moral high ground that he and his insane society clings to, so he decided to make up a lie, to accuse someone else of declaring a war against america, so that he could more easily demonize them, and retain the illusion of america being a "victim who is only responding to the war that was declared against us, in declaring war back against the enemy." In point of fact, the Taliban, in other words the Afghanistan government, displayed an almost incredible degree of restraint in the wake of america declaring war against them, waiting until days after the actual war was launched by america, after hundreds of Afghani citizens had been killed by americans, before finally declaring war back, by publically announcing that they were embracing a "jihad", a holy war, against america. So, it is clear to any sane thinker that this war was officially declared and started by america.

This leaves us with the issue of who "provoked the conflict" between the two societies, that caused the war to occur. The issue of provocation, as I have already stated, is extremely difficult to accurately resolve, because diseased and evil societies/governments are constantly provoking, goading, humiliating, threatening, victimizing, each other. The notion that the afghanistan government provoked the conflict by providing safe harbor to the man who convinced these nineteen men to commit mass murder on american soil, is extremely thin and does not hold up to any type of rational scrutiny. Neither does the notion that the Afghanistan government is somehow responsible for the actions of these nineteen autonomous men, or for "helping" them to undertake the actions that they did, to the degree of justifying the initiation of a war by america, against the autonomous country of afghanistan and it's supreme leaders. Holding the government of Afghanistan responsible for the alleged criminal actions of one of it's citizens, while refusing to acknowledge the legitimacy of the Afghan judicial system to determine the guilt or innocence of the alleged criminal, smacks of the highest degree of arrogance and scorn for the autonomy of other governments, that has been a hallmark of the american governmental policy of fascist oppression for centuries, ever since america came into existence as a nation, in fact.

The reality is, the four September 11, 2001 incidents on american soil were retaliatory strikes by a private individual who felt and believed that he himself, as well as the society that he chooses to "pledge allegiance" to, had been and continue to be brutally and unjustly victimized and genocidally harmed in a direct way, by the official, ongoing governmental actions and policies of america. This is the Truth. It doesn't mean that Osama's society is a good, decent, moral society. It doesn't even necessarily mean that Afghanistan is a more moral, more decent society/government than america is, although it is clear to me that a very good argument can be made that america is currently the most immoral, most diseased society/government on planet earth. The unbiased, factually accurate Truth is that as is usually the case, both societies that are involved in this war are inferior, diseased, genocidally harmful towards their own citizen-slaves, and neither government has a legitimate right to exist, a legitimate right to stay in power. Neither society deserves to have the support of it's citizens, much less to have millions of citizen-slaves willing and eager to risk their lives and to die while "defending" their society/government. Because conflict between diseased and evil nations is ritualistic and retaliatory in structure and design, the question of which side "provoked" the conflict that resulted in the actual initiation of a war, is quite irrelevant and cannot be accurately revealed. It would be easy to say that america provoked the conflict, that has led to this america-afghanistan war, and on a personal level, I am quite certain that america did provoke it. But it is not possible to examine, or even to know about, every single tit for tat retaliatory act of injustice and provocation that each society/government has undertaken against the other society/government. It's also not possible to accurately track down the very first act of unjust imposition/provocation that one of these societies/governments imposed upon the other. In theory, you could say that the very first act, hundreds of years ago, was the "initial provocation", but in practical terms, there have been so many provocations since then, that to blame the initial provocation, hundreds of years ago, for the current war, doesn't really hold up solidly. How can this issue be resolved? Very easily, because it is not a major or primary point of contention, and it does not deserve our focus, to any ongoing degree.

The profoundly important Truths that must be focused on is the fact that both societies are incredibly inferior, diseased, perverse, and genocidally evil towards their own citizens, to the degree that these societies cause even more harm to their own citizens, than they can or do seek to cause to members of "enemy" societies during the commission of wars. This brings us to the even more profound Truth, that no society/government deserves to have the allegiance of it's own citizens. Within a society of sane human beings, if the governments of america and afghanistan declared war upon one another, not only would no americans be willing to fight in the war on behalf of america, and not only would no afghanis be willing to fight in the war on behalf of afghanistan, but a majority of american citizens would in fact be more willing to fight against the american government, as it is currently structured and operated, than would be willing to fight for the american government, and this exact same rule would apply for afghani citizens. This would constitute Truth, an embrace of Truth, a recognition by individuals that currently, in the year 2001, all societies inflict the greatest degree of injustice, trauma, and harm, upon their own citizens, thus, such societies not only do not deserve the "patriotic" support of their citizen-slaves, but if in fact such societies seek to enlist their citizen-slaves to fight and go to war on behalf of their society, it is the decreed enemy society/government which is in most cases "more" worthy of the individual's support, than his own society/government is. On a practical level of course, since neither society is moral, decent, or good, the primary obligation of all self-loving, Truth-embracing individuals would be to refuse to endanger their own safety, health, welfare, and life, by refusing to fight for or aid either society's side, in any war.

One of the emotional/brainwash dynamics at play here, is the same dynamic that causes most children who are being brutally victimized and abused by their parents, to ferociously cling to their abusers, if confronted with the "threat" of being taken away from their parents and placed in foster homes or under the control of Child Protective Services. Most children in such a situation will fiercely demand to stay with their parent/torturers. They will resist all attempts by CPS and other social workers to rescue them, to remove them from custody of their parents, even though no other human being on planet earth has hurt, abused, victimized them as much as their parents have. Why is this so?? It's because the child-slaves have been terroristically brainwashed into believing that even though their parents have hurt them a great deal, far more than any other human being has hurt them, if they should fall into the clutches of other human beings, as primary slaves, the other human beings would hurt them far more than their parents had and are hurting them. The child has no real basis for comparison, all the child knows is that his primary caretakers have brutally hurt him, but they sometimes claim to like/love him, and they tell him, together with the lie-based societal ideology that all children are subjected to, that plenty of other adults are "evil" and will inflict far more abuse and terrible suffering upon him, than he is currently enduring. So the tortured child makes the choice to align himself with his torturing parents, to resist all efforts to place him in a safer environment with superior caretakers, because he has been brainwashed into believing that despite the fact that he is suffering greatly right now, under the custody of his torturing parents, he will suffer much greater abuse and trauma if placed in the primary care of any other adults. An instinctual "fear of the unknown" comes into significant play as well. This is one of the dynamics at work, in an exactly parallel manner, on the issue of citizen-slaves of a society/government choosing to declare fierce loyalty, devotion, and support for "their" society/government, during a declared war. The pathetic, brainwashed citizen-slaves are made terrified of the "bizarre" ideology of the demonized enemy, and they are told that the other, bizarre and demonized society/government is evil, that this "enemy" will torture, enslave, brutalize, destroy the citizen-slaves, if it is allowed to "win the war". This causes terror among the tortured citizen-slaves, and wins their blind allegiance and devotion, to the point where they are perfectly willing to risk their lives via an insane & irrational "defense" of their society, even though their own society has already and is continuing to, torture, enslave, brutalize, and overtly harm them, a Forbidden Truth that of course 99.999999 of all citizen-slaves can never even come close to understanding, much less accepting and embracing as Truth. And this is despite the fact that the "enemy" society has not directly harmed them at all, exactly parallel to how the child clings to his viciously abusive parents, refusing to go live with strangers who have never abused or hurt him at all. Fear of the unknown, causes you creatures to chooses a known evil, over a completely unknown option, due to both societal brainwashing and an irrational, illogical fear that the unknown option will end up being even more evil, and causing you even more harm, despite the fact that there is no valid reason to jump to that assumption. Absolutely pathetic, the complete lack of sane reasoning skills, among you humans.

The proper, sane solution/response to declarations of war by societal leaders, assuming that both leaders seek to engage in a war involving their human weapons, would be for the citizens of each society to seize their supreme leader, then to transport both leaders to an arena that is equipped with a large, locking, steel cage. Both supreme leaders would be stripped naked, shoved into the cage, the cage would be locked, and the two leaders would be instructed that they are to either fight to the death, or agree to call off their desired war. Both leaders must agree to call off the war, or else the fight to the death must be initiated. Does this sound "crazy" to you creatures? If it does, the reason is that you people are crazy, and cannot recognize a sane and proper solution when it is presented to you. In war, supreme leaders of societies use you, their citizen-slaves, as human weapons. They sacrifice your safety, your health, your lives, to satisfy and satiate their own insane and malevolent personal demons, as well as increase their own political popularity and strength. They have every right to live out their True Realities, to victimize and genocidally harm others, as does every human victim. The issue at hand is whether you, the citizens, have an obligation to choose to allow these supreme leaders to dictate, manipulate, control, and sacrifice your lives, for their personally cathartic pleasure and gain? From any sane perspective, the answer to this question is No. You have no such obligation, and if you possess a proper degree of self-love and narcissism, you will overtly reject all efforts by your supreme leaders to manipulate, control, and endanger your lives, even if you yourself are filled with rage and hate and share a similar mindset of needing to claim vengeance through violence, as your supreme leaders do. Societies and governments deliberately attempt to hijack, manipulate, control, and direct the homicidal rage of their citizen-slaves. They provide you with a "demonized enemy", instruct you that it is a good thing to try and kill these total strangers, and decree this form of murder to be not only legal, but morally appropriate and necessary. This is the Truth about what war is. The purpose of war is to provide societal leaders with an outlet for their genocidal, power-crazed rage, to increase their popular stranglehold of rule within the political dynamic of the society, and to provide the masses of citizen-slaves with a demonized foreign enemy to hate and to kill, so that the internal rage that exists within the populace is directed outward, towards an "innocent" foreign society that has been invalidly demonized, as opposed to allowing this rage to possibly be directed in a more appropriate manner by individuals, towards the society that is in fact directly responsible for the personal victimization of the individual, the society that the person was born into, grew up within, and/or currently lives within.

So, when a supreme leader attempts to promote a war, to incite, coerce, and recruit his citizen-slaves to participate in a war, the proper, sane response by citizens would be to demand that the leader himself agree to be locked in a cage with the opposing supreme leader, the leader that he is trying to provoke into agreeing to engage in a war. Lock them both in the steel cage, have them fight to the death if they so wish. If they are so desperately eager to cathartically relieve their personal life traumas and rage, let them put their lives on the line. They do not deserve to be able to put your lives on the line, to get you to fight as weapons on their behalf, using nothing but lies, brainwashing, manipulation, and a perversely invalid doctrine of patriotic illusion and enemy demonization. Of course the problem, as usual, is that you humans are incredibly inferior. You buy into the brainwashing and lies at the drop of a hat, you follow each other and tow the party lines of your societies like lemmings. You are filled with homicidal rage, coupled with the perverse notion that you have morals, and thus you are on a daily, desperate search for any living things, human and otherwise, that you can justify demonizing and directing your homicidal hatred upon. At the same time, you look to your supreme leaders to provide you with the "moral permission" that you feel you need, in order to maintain the illusion that you are good creatures even as you release your homicidal rage. This is the absolutely perfect climate for enraged, homicidal societal leaders to match up, incite each other, mutually demonize each other's regimes and citizen-slaves, and engage in genocidal wars, which serve to relieve their own personal emotional distress, and increase the popularity of both their governments, in most cases, even as the human weapons of each society are insanely attempting to mass murder the total strangers who just happen to be members of the other society, upon the insane command of the supreme leaders of each society. It is utterly mind-boggling, how you creatures seem to have not an iota of interest in even understanding, the incredible, multi-tiered layers of brutal vitimization that your own societal leaders deliberately and maliciously impose upon you, via the war ritual.

If confronted with a demand to fight to the death inside of a steel cage, the vast majority of supreme leaders would decline. They would call off the war, and try to find other ways to relieve their personal, emotional distress and homicidal rage. Being a supreme leader offers many different methods to boost the ego, oppress and victimize other human beings, both within and outside of your own nation, without having to outright risk your own life, in a direct, fight to the death manner. Supreme leaders engage in wars because it is a relatively easy, relatively safe way, for them to both increase the popularity/strength of their regimes, and to make themselves feel very good emotionally, to relieve their personal frustrations, rage, and hate, by employing a vast number of human beings as weapons to commit mass murder and other atrocities against fellow humans. They themselves often do not feel that they are seriously endangering their own lives or safety, in the wars they choose to engage in. If stripped of the ability to use and hide behind their brainwashed human weapons, and compelled to personally fight each other to the death in a two man battle, most would recognize the serious danger to their own personal safety and lives, and simply call off the war. Would this earn them a justifiable label of "coward"? No, not really. Sane human beings instinctually seek to defend and protect themselves, and if faced with a threat or danger, they want to use weapons, the most effective weapons they can, to try and protect themselves and maximize their chances of not being hurt or killed. So, just like a mugger, hijacker, cop, security guard, or aspiring murderer usually wants to have an effective weapon to use to both protect himself and to defeat any threat or danger they may face, the supreme leaders of societies want to have the only genuinely effective weapon that can be used to engage in a war, that would be a huge number of human beings, human weapons, so-called "soldiers", who have officially agreed to fight, risk death, and try to kill complete strangers, blindly upon the command of the supreme leader. If this "army" is not available, not willing to serve as human weapons, the supreme leader will most likely call off the war, since he personally is not willing to risk his own life, in a locked steel cage, one on one battle to the death type of event. The key to understanding how genocidally evil societies are, is recognizing that knives, guns, bombs, and human beings, can all be used as weapons. But guns, knives, bombs are not alive, they are not sentient. They cannot suffer horrific consequences, because they have no sentient existence. Human beings however, are alive, they can and do suffer horribly. And with limitless malice aforethought, societies and governments choose to genocidally turn human beings into human weapons, displaying the same utter contempt for their lives and welfare that characterizes every aspect of the slave-based design structure of all human societies.

Let us keep in mind here, that a very large percentage of human beings are in fact genuinely suicidal, either on a conscious or subconscious level. The more mentally diseased and dysfunctional a person is, the more likely they are to have a suicidal ideology within their mindsets. And supreme leaders of societies are among the most mentally diseased and dysfunctional of all human beings. Therefore, logic dictates that at least some supreme leaders of societies have been and will be actively suicidal, even as they serve as supreme leaders. An argument can be made that John F. Kennedy's chosen policies and interactions with russia while he was president, indicates suicidal ideology on his part. An even better argument can be made that right now, Osama bin-Laden's chosen actions over the past year or so, indicates that he is actively suicidal, although most likely not on a conscious level. I will be discussing suicide at great length in a separate essay later on at this website, but the specific point that needs to be made here, is that the suicidal supreme leader poses the greatest of all threats and danger to the citizen-slaves that he rules, because such a supreme leader is most likely to deliberately choose to undertake not only genocidal wars, but in addition, genocidal wars that his military is very unlikely to be able to "win", thus maximizing the likely number of casualties that his own brainwashed human weapons, as well as all citizens living under his regime, will likely suffer. The greatest hope and likelihood for the extinction of humanity from this planet, lies in a supreme leader of a society/government, filled with both homicidal rage and suicidal derangement, having access to enough weapons that are capable of destroying all human life on planet earth, and having the emotional strength and determination to not only goad another supreme leader into participating in a war, but escalating the war to the point where he can emotionally justify to himself, using the nuclear and other weapons to the point of worldwide human annihilation. I am quite confident that this will occur, in the near future, especially since the societies/governments that are most diseased and evil, such as america, are generally the same societies that have developed and stockpiled the largest supplies of the most lethal weapons, that are easily capable of annihilating all human life from the planet. The only ingredient needed, is to have two supreme leaders, both extremely enraged and mentally ill, of two such societies, come together and decide to help each other feel better by engaging in a war.

When this does occur, and I say when because it will definitely occur, just a matter of time, it is not the two supreme leaders who should be "blamed" for the annihilation of the human race that will occur. No, folks. It is you, I repeat it is you people, you "ordinary" citizen-slaves, who will be to blame. You Truth-haters who will only empower people who are as enraged and insane as you are, to be your supreme leaders. You people who are so desperate to find a legal and morally sanctioned outlet for your homicidal rage, that you agree to serve, act, and perform as human weapons for your supreme leaders, by joining the militaries of your societies and accepting the "opportunity" to "serve your country" by blindly mass murdering complete strangers upon the command of the leader of your society, a society that has already abused, victimized, enslaved, and viciously harmed you. Even though you will be to "blame", we must continue to recognize that in all aspects of life, the victim must not be demonized or held responsible, or declared "guilty" of anything. All human weapons, all "soldiers", are victims of the society that they are "defending", the society that they are citizens of, and of the genocidal war their supreme leader chose to undertake. My use of the word "blame" above, is not meant to place responsibility upon the mainstream citizen-slaves. It is only meant to reveal the Truth, that you creatures are the "last line in the sand", if only you were sane and Superior, no diseased & deranged aspiring societal leader could ever come to power. But this Truth is a moot, basically irrelevant Truth, because the reality is that you creatures are insane and inferior, created torture victims of each previous generation of tortured, insane, and inferior human beings, and this endless, unbreakable cycle is guaranteed to continue, right up until the very moment of species annihilation. On a personal level, it does comfort and please me to know with certainty that the human race will extinct itself fairly soon, because I recognize that the human species, not only because of the personal torture that it has maliciously subjected me to, but for all of the reasons outlined in this Manifesto, does not deserve to exist.

Okay, we still have a lot of ground to cover on this war topic, so I will try to be a bit less verbose as the mountain of Forbidden Truth continues to grow and deepen. Some things need to be said about the role that the media plays in all wars. First of all, there is no such thing as a "free" media, in either a democratic or a totalitarian/communist society. All medias are viciously manipulated and controlled by the supreme political/ideological leaders of societies. Democratic societies simply provide a more lie-based illusion of media freedom, to their citizen-slaves. This is nothing more than an illusion, and during the period of time that a society declares itself to be "at war", the illusion is revealed, especially within societies that claim to be free and democratic, to any sane observer and Truth-seeker. During wartime, the government overtly removes even the illusions of media freedom. The government even admits that it lies to the media, but claims to be justified in doing so because it's necessary in order to "protect the national interests". Speaking of the 1988 Persian Gulf war, Jay Coupe, who was at that time the official spokesman for the united states Joint Chiefs of Staff, now admits: We actually put out a false message to mislead people. The idea was not to give information about the movement of our carrier. We were trying to confuse people. A united states military officer who is "currently" involved in planning out the current war that is underway between america and afghanistan told the Washington Post newspaper, in September of 2001, We're going to lie about things. If it is an information war, certainly the bad guys will lie. Ha, "bad guys", that makes me chuckle, the promoters of war, along with you ordinary, brainwashed idiot folks, never pass up a chance to demonize the enemy. :-) But I digress, the point here is that the societal lie about the media being free, is finally unveiled when it comes to war. The government admits that it is lying to the media, and the media admits, although usually not in an overtly verbal manner, that it is not actively pursuing or demanding Truth, although it still maintains the lie that it tries to avoid reporting things that it positively knows to be false, as being definitively true. The reality is that all medias are constantly being used as tools, promotional and ideological tools, by societal leaders, and the lies, myths, brainwashings that are a core fabric of the societal structure and design itself, along with many other more topical, evolving lies and deceptions, are constantly being put forth by the media as constituting Truth, every single day of your lives. Neither the government nor the media will admit to this fact, of course. But during wartime, after patriotic fervor has been whipped up, the veil of deceit is momentarily allowed to drop, using a claim that "We must keep some things secret, and lie about other things, in order to protect our national security". What right does the media have to align itself with the existing government within which they live as empowered citizen-slaves? The media has absolutely no business promoting the war that "their" societal leaders have chosen to engage in. And yet that's exactly what they do, they adopt the exact same insanely patriotic attitude in their journalistic endeavors, as all citizen-slaves are instructed to adopt during wartime, by their malevolent supreme leaders. Journalist, news journalists, deliberately lie and withhold information from you, the citizen-slaves. They also overtly take the side of the government that they live as citizen-slaves of, the government that holds fascist power over them. This is every bit as true in the american journalism system, as in any other government's. Every mainstream, nationally broadcast news show in america, that originates in america, takes an overtly nationalistic tone and position, in reporting about any war that america is actively engaged in. This demonstrates that there is no genuine freedom of the press/media, and it also demonstrates that all "empowered" news media outlets in america, are in fact compelled by force, to serve as propaganda agents for the american government, in it's war promotion and legitimization efforts and intentions. This Truth applies to all other medias in all other countries too of course, as regards their war engagements.

Now, the fact that almost all so-called "journalists" are eager and proud to assume this nationalistic bias in their reporting, is a testament to how incredibly pervasive and powerful societal brainwashing and "non-forceful" coercion, within a society like america. But make no mistake, in a capitalistic society, journalists are nothing more than employee-slaves.. It is the highly wealthy owners of national media companies who are under the terroristic control of societal leaders, and it is they who dictate, by force, meaning among other things the power to fire any employee of theirs at any time, for any reason, the nationalistic tone that all news reporters are required to take. On top of all that, the patriotic brainwashing of the citizenry is so pervasive that any mainstream news source that refused to take a pro-america bias in it's reporting, would not only come under intense public criticism, but also lose so many viewers/readers/listeners that it would become economically unviable. So, in a very real sense, the capitalistic system itself serves to silence, chill, and shut off media freedom, because every media outlet is economically dependent upon pandering to the brainwashed majority, thus losing all ability to focus on reporting the true, unbiased, facts. All wars are nothing more than endless propaganda campaigns, lie after lie after lie, denial of truth by the government, suppression of information, deliberate misdirection of public focus and denial of the actual, ongoing events related to the war, not to mention the True reasons for why the war was even undertaken by the leaders of the society. The media is at the very heart of how wars are promoted and propagandized, on a daily basis. The media shamelessly and at every turn validates and legitimizes these governmental propaganda campaigns, deliberately feeding citizen-slaves a completely invalid, distorted, untrue, biased, perversely patriotic and pro-government ideological message, on a daily basis, thus virtually guaranteeing that no significant number of citizen-slaves will ever be able to wade through this mountain of lie-based governmental propaganda, and arrive at rational, sane, Truth, such as I am revealing in this essay.

Within a free and sane society, the media would have absolutely no bias towards any government. The news media would recognize and accept that it has a sacred obligation to report and disseminate the factual truths of all stories, while not even conveying, much less promoting, any type of ideological, political, moralistic, or nationalistic bias. There is absolutely no valid reason for why the american news media reports the america/afghanistan war in a certain tone, while the afghani media, small as it is, reports this war in a completely different tone. The fact that the two tones are completely different, proves that each news media is choosing, admittedly under the terroristic coercion of their government, to serve not the public interest, not the interests of humanity, not the journalistic code of ethics via truthful and unbiased reporting that most claim to subscribe to, but rather the undeniably lie-based, propaganda structured, completely malevolent, nationalistically genocidal agenda of the governments in which they reside and serve as citizens to, and the mentally deranged supreme leaders who rule these governments. The news media is an active and willing partner of the government, in all wars. The media participates as an ally of the government in which it is based and headquartered, reporting on the war from a horrifically biased, journalistically invalid, perspective. The news media overtly serves as a valuable tool for disseminating governmental lies and propaganda at all times, but most outrageously and harmfully, during wartime. There is an absolutely collusive agreement between governments and the empowered news medias that exist within governments, to promote via propaganda and lies, legitimize, and foment public support for the government that is in place, and all governmental policies, with absolutely no journalistically valid interest in uncovering or revealing Truth, during all wars. And this is true for all governments of the world, possibly even more true for so-called democracies, because the illusion of such societies offering "more freedom" has to be maintained, but at the same time overcome, via an even greater degree of relentless propaganda and media misdirection designed to terroristically compel as many citizen-slaves as possible into agreeing to fervently support "their" government and society during wartime.

A few words about patriotism here. Patriotism is an artificial mindset, induced by coercive governmental ideology, in which citizen-slaves of a society are told that they need to develop an irrational devotion and allegiance to their government, which is based upon blind acceptance of governmental claims and demands, that very specifically involve no philosophical or intellectual efforts to recognize Truth. Within the teachings that societies undertake, in getting citizens to adopt a patriotic mindset, a very specific pattern of blind, irrational allegiance, that instructs pupils to reject and ignore rationality and Truth, is employed. This pattern is similar to how societies addict their citizens to the insane god myth. All rational thinking and deductive reasoning is declared invalid and improper, as a part of patriotic brainwashing. Irrational, nonsensical, blindly hypocritical mindsets are decreed to be proper and appropriate, as the plague of patriotic ideology is imposed upon citizens. Overtly terroristic, as well as milder types of peer pressure coercion, are employed in these efforts. As always, the pathetic human need to be considered "normal" by other people who are nearby, coworkers, relatives, etc..., is exploited by society, as the patriotic fervor is desperately spread, especially during a decreed "time of war". It is no exaggeration to call patriotism a plague. Yes, it likely is less toxic, on some levels, than the god myth plague and some other plagues, but it is still a toxic plague, and it is highly destructive to a tremendous number of human beings, not only destroying their ability to even try to recognize the Forbidden Truths of war, but in many cases directly causing them to needlessly and insanely endanger and sacrifice their own safety, health, and lives.

I've already made this point, but it is so provocative that it bears a bit of repetition and enhancement: In war, supreme leaders of societies use their citizen-slaves as surrogates, to commit murder of complete strangers on their behalf. The soldier is being used as a surrogate murderer, by the homicidally enraged and mentally ill supreme leader of his society. This type of murder is decreed to be legal, of course, and it is undeniably true that a significant number of children who join militaries, do so very specifically because they themselves are homicidally enraged and recognize that in joining the military, they may, they certainly hope they will, be given an opportunity to commit murder, to kill fellow human beings, without facing any type of negative or punitive consequences/punishment. There is a tremendous, albeit a perverse, advantage to society in convincing these children, these torture victims, these homicidally enraged victims of the society that they were born into and raised up within, to align themselves not against the evil society that is responsible for their victimization, but rather for this society. To direct their homicidal rage on behalf of the society that is guilty of their victimization, when all logic dictates that if they are to direct homicidal rage towards anyone, it would be much more appropriately and rationally directed towards their own society, not towards a demonized enemy society that in most cases has literally had no negative impact of any kind upon their personal life and the life traumas that the person has endured. It is tragic that so many children make this choice, lacking the intellectual ability or the emotional/psychological strength/insight that is required, to recognize that there is a very real and genuine difference between directing homicidal rage upon others within the society that created/victimized you, as opposed to directing such rage upon members of a foreign society, only when given "permission" to do so by a "superior", a foreign society that has not had any impact upon their own personal childhoods and lives. But at the same time I do understand and realize how powerful the lure can be, when a homicidally enraged victim of society is offered the opportunity to commit murder, and informed that as long as he only obeys his superiors, the murders will be decreed perfectly legal and appropriate, with the murderer facing absolutely no threat of punitive punishment or moral/cultural condemnation.

Wars, just like hunting, the death penalty, abortion, euthanasia, in past decades lynching, public hanging of "criminals", burning "witches" to death at the stake, etc..., are specifically marketed by societies and governments, as being a legitimate and appropriate expression and release of individual, homicidal rage. Societies try hard to get their tortured child victims to agree to commit legal murders, rather than illegal murders. To join the military, to go hunting, to sadistically revel in the death penalty, to kill their womb-trapped babies. A majority of all people who would label themselves as being "hard-core patriots, ready, eager, and proud to defend my country with my life", are in reality, at their emotional cores, on a subconscious level, obsessed with and desperately eager to do one thing: Kill fellow human beings. The only caveat is that many of them feel they must have the permission of and an order from their society to kill, in order to find the hypocritically invalid moral justification within their own perceptions of reality, to actually commit the murders that they spend their lives subconsciously obsessing over and lusting for. Understand this Truth, folks. The "heroic soldier" who receives a ticker-tape parade, medals from his government, and societal praise, for his exploits as a "sniper", "gunner", etc..., is in reality nothing more than a homicidal torture victim of the very society that is perversely heaping praise upon him for murdering complete strangers on it's behalf, via a genocidally evil and immoral war that it chose to initiate, participate in, and sponsor. The "illegal" murderer, who directs his homicidal rage in a much more rational manner, towards the society that created him, is demonized and punitively punished, while the legal murderer, who in a far more irrational manner agreed to mass murder total strangers on behalf of the society that victimized him, is praised and honored and rewarded. The hypocrisy of this is mind-boggling!

Even more so when you consider that the exact same personal motivation, a True Reality need for cathartic vengeance through murder, for personal suffering and victimization inflicted by the society, is the primary reason for why both of these people decided and chose to commit the murders that they did. The legal murderer simply embraces more societal lies and brainwashings, than the illegal murderer, who is rational enough to be able to see and accept the fact that a far more appropriate target for his rage than "enemy" humans that his diseased society chooses to demonize for him, is his own society, the society that is guilty of and responsible for his victimization. The notion that the "legal" murder is somehow morally justifiable, while the illegal murder is a terrible crime that must be punished, is utterly ludicrous when considered and analyzed from any type of a sane, unbiased perspective.

Mass murdering total strangers is not a crime, if your government orders you to do so on it's behalf. But mass murdering total strangers is a terrible crime, if you exercise your own free will in terms of choosing to do so on your own, without governmental permission. Do you creatures realize how ludicrous this is, from any sane viewpoint?? And on top of everything else, from any type of a moral perspective, the "mindless" murder of complete strangers done on the command of a "boss", has to be recognized as being much harder to morally justify, especially when you consider that the society and government itself, that orders the murders, is utterly malevolent, to the point of absolute genocide. The very existence of the practice of war within a society, has to be seen by any sane thinker, as constituting a legitimization of all forms and types of murder, within the society, because by definition and by rational analysis, war provides and allows for the literally limitless mass murder of complete strangers, including women and children, and war overtly involves a governmental order to citizens, to commit such limitless murder on it's behalf. There is no other form of murder that is as unjustifiable as governmentally ordered war murder, therefore all other types and forms of murder should be 100% legal, and in fact highly praiseworthy, as long as the society/government in question chooses to continue to participate in wars.

I have already revealed the Forbidden Truth that no society/government deserves to have it's citizens endanger their welfare or lives in defense of the existing regime/government, upon the declaration of a war by the supreme leader of the society. This is because no large, nationalistic human society currently in existence on planet earth, is genuinely benevolent, and no society treats it's own citizens properly, with respect, with value, and in a non-abusive manner. But at the same time, it is clear that some societies are far more toxic and diseased, inflict significantly more harm and trauma upon their citizen-slaves, than other societies do. This brings up the question, if one of the most insane and diseased societies of the world, lets say america, decided to launch a war against one of the least diseased and malevolent societies of the world, lets say Iceland, would the citizens of Iceland have good reason to agree to help their government in the war, by fighting for Iceland, using the argument that they themselves, as individuals, do stand to suffer a significant decrease in their own quality of life, if this most evil and diseased of governments overthrows their far less evil and diseased government, and assumes power over them?

First of all, we need to recognize that the vast majority of wars occur between two governments/societies that are both extremely diseased, and usually fairly equal in terms of their overall maliciousness and inferiority. They may be very different in terms of political ideology and the general lifestyle of their typical citizen-slaves, but they will be very much alike in terms of how they are both inferior and brutally oppressive. America and afghanistan have totally different political/ideological structures, but in terms of how each society is brutally oppressive and genocidally abusive towards their own citizens, there is a remarkable similarity. As I have already stated, when it comes to war, extremely inferior societies, led by inferior supreme leaders, usually seek out a "partner" to engage in the war with, a society/government that is also extremely inferior. It is extremely rare for a significantly less inferior society, like Iceland, to become the chosen target of war, for an extremely diseased society. Secondly, we need to remember that wars are almost always mutually agreeable and mutually provocative endeavors. In most cases, both societies/governments, on some level, want to engage in a war, and they repeatedly incite and provoke each other prior to "officially" declaring war upon each other. A society like Iceland is likely not agreeable to war, they are not looking to engage in a war, and so any initial efforts made by another society to initiate a mutually agreeable war via provocation, would likely be rebuffed by Iceland. The other, more diseased society, would then move on, looking to find some other society that is more agreeable to engaging in a war. This is because the invalid moral illusion of justification has to be maintained in order to win widespread public support for a war, and if the "enemy" society refuses to allow itself to be provoked, refuses to agree to participate in the war, ignores the minor provocations that the far more diseased society attempts, the supreme leader of the far more diseased society will almost certainly abandon his intention to engage in a war with that particular nation, and move on to looking for a more agreeable "war partner".

But it is true that in some very rare cases, an existing extremely diseased society, or more likely a rogue gang of extremely enraged people looking to create a society of their own by seizing land, will initiate a war against a significantly less diseased society. In such a situation, I guess the logical thing to do would be for the citizens of the less diseased society to rationally decide, on their own, with no governmental coercion or propaganda, whether or not the harm that they themselves feel they would experience if they allowed their existing government to be overthrown by the far more inferior society that had declared war on them, justifies them endangering their own lives by agreeing to fight a war, on behalf of defending themselves, not their supreme leader and not their government, but defending themselves, their own welfare and way of life, from the threat of a significant loss of personal quality of life, if the ultra-diseased society were to become their rulers. An example of this would be the native indians in north america, trying to fight off the genocidal, unprovoked invasion of their sovereign land, by the homicidally enraged European drifters who tragically ended up winning that war and forming the ultra-diseased, supremely malevolent country/society of america. So, I am willing to admit, via my above comments, that in a very few, select situations, as long as absolutely no governmental war promotion propaganda or coercion is involved, the citizens themselves, of a society that is genuinely superior to most, if facing a declaration of war made against them by an ultra-diseased and extremely inferior society, may have a legitimate justification for trying to defend their borders and repel a war attack that is launched against them. But again, over 99.8% of all wars do not even come close to fitting into this unique and extremely rare category.

The notion that wars are not designed to harm and kill women, children, and other "non-military" people living within the demonized society that is being attacked, is simply ludicrous. Wars are campaigns of genocide, and a claim by either party that only "enemy soldiers and military targets" are the intended victims, is nothing more than a blatant lie, given in order to enhance and increase the perception of moral legitimacy among citizen-slaves, that their society is the "good side", fighting a noble battle for moral reasons, instead of engaging in blatant genocide for no valid reason at all, which is in fact the Truth of the matter. The great irony of course, is that almost all front-line military troops are in fact children themselves, 19, 20, 21, 25 years old, utter children in every valid sense of the word, since the vast majority of all human beings barely begin to reach some degree of mental maturity only after the age of 28. Every human being under the age of 28 is a child. And certainly when it comes to making an incredibly difficult, life and death decision, such as whether or not to agree to try and kill complete strangers on behalf of your society, while facing off against complete strangers from the other "side" who have similarly been brainwashed into trying to kill you, complete maturity of the type that most people don't reach until their early 30's, would be required, in any sane society. Soldiers are taught to see and judge the women and children of their "enemy" as being worthless and expendable, objects to be used and abused, even if their actual lives are spared. This leads to sex-crazed soldiers going on group rape rampages against women, and children too, as part of the war ritual. Brutalizing a woman via rape feeds the adrenaline of the enraged, homicidal soldier, whipping him up into more of a killing frenzy, especially if he hasn't had an opportunity to kill adult male "enemy" targets, in the recent past. The most diseased societies, like america, will overtly commit child genocide during their wars, as america has done against Iraq, but never admit to this of course, and insanely blame their demonized enemy and it's leader, such as Saddam Hussein, for "causing" over 500,000 of the children in his country to die, by "refusing to surrender, admit defeat, and accept his humiliation" in the war, even though it is obvious, when looked at from any sane perspective, that the government of america, through it's completely immoral and unjustifiable military and political policies, is completely responsible for and guilty of the Iraqi child genocide that has occurred for the past 12 years and is continuing to occur today.

I've already briefly discussed the issue of "war crimes" in my Crime essay, but lets expand upon this ludicrous judicial notion. According to governmental doctrine, engaging in a genocidal war, trying to kill thousands if not millions of human beings, as a governmental policy, is in no way a crime. However, the brainwashed, tortured children who are compelled to engage in these wars on behalf of their governments, can engage in activity that is criminal in nature, be accused of war crimes, be charged with such crimes, convicted of them and thrown into prison, even when the child-soldier only targeted members of the demonized foreign enemy that their very own society brainwashed them into hating and considering appropriate targets for violence and attack! And so once again, we have hypocrisy that is so blatant, so undeniable in it's scope, that the mind cannot help but be boggled. There is no way that any action undertaken by anyone acting on behalf of the enemy demonization doctrine of their warmongering society, can or should be considered a crime, much less a crime deserving of punitive punishment. War itself is the greatest crime of all, a crime undertaken by governmental and societal leaders against both their own itizen-slaves and the "foreign enemy" they have chosen to demonize. If society and the government choose to undertake this greatest of all crimes, a crime in which they specifically set out to murder a limitless number of people, as many as it deems "necessary" in order to win the war, then obviously the society loses all moral or legal credibility insofar as decreeing any individual in the world, to be a "war criminal". War itself is the crime. If war is declared legal and non-criminal by a government, than any and all actions undertaken by anyone fighting in a war must be decreed legal and non-criminal as well. An individual killing "innocent" civilians and raping women cannot be considered to cause any greater harm, in a war, than the "unofficial" but absolutely accurate mission and goal of the war itself, which is to kill as many members of the demonized enemy as it takes, to get the demonized enemy to admit defeat and surrender. Soldiers are nothing more than civilian members of society who have been either brutally brainwashed or overtly forced, in many cases both, to agree to try to murder complete strangers on behalf of their governmental/societal leaders. Therefore the blood and the blame for every death, the injury of every victim in all wars, rests upon not the child-soldier brainwashee, but upon the government and society that sponsored and undertook the war. The soldier is simply an employee, carrying out, under terrorization, the malicious, immoral orders of the society/government that is choosing to undertake the war. You will note that the victorious party in wars, is almost always the party that most stridently accuses members of the losing side of having committed war crimes. This is yet another form of moral justification, since in most cases the winning side has killed many more people than the losing side. By accusing the losing side of having "fought dirty" in the war by committing war crimes, the side that most likely was more brutal, the winning side, deflects all criticism away from itself and insanely maintains a position of moral superiority over their vanquished opponent. For a society/government to brainwash a child into agreeing to commit mass murder on it's behalf, is the ultimate crime. For any society or government to afterwards decree that child to be guilty of some type of crime relating to the murders, rapes, or other violence he undertook while serving as a societally hired, brainwashed/coerced killer, and to even dare suggest that such a victim deserves to be punitively punished by a judicial system for his actions, is so bizarre and hypocritical that it deserves no additional comment.

Let us be perfectly clear, that despite all of the insane war mythology which instructs you sheeple that the targeting of human beings among the demonized enemy who happen to be in the military is perfectly appropriate, while the targeting of "civilian" members of the demonized enemy is inappropriate, nothing could be further from the Truth. This notion is nothing more than an attempt by the leaders of each side to establish a climate of moral legitimacy for the genocidal mass murder that they are choosing to undertake. Every military is filled with ordinary citizens, civilians, who have been brutally brainwashed at best, and terroristically compelled under threat of death at worst, by the leaders of their societies and empowered agents of these leaders, into agreeing to try and murder complete strangers of a demonized foreign society. These members of the military are victims of the brutality and brainwashing of their own societies/governments, and the notion that they are somehow more "legitimate" targets for murder by the enemy within the societally devised & deranged war ritual, is utterly perverse and ludicrous. In point of fact, the vast majority of all "active duty" military personnel are children. They were children when they were terroristically compelled to first join the military, and they are still children, tortured and victimized children, during their "wartime" service, since the typical child does not even begin to approach the lowest thresholds of genuine mental, emotional, and intellectual maturity until at least the age of 28.

Continuing on this theme of civilian versus military targeting during wars, lets understand that all governments fight their wars in an "appropriately" cowardly manner. I use the word appropriate here, because despite societal lies, there is absolutely no legitimately negative connotation that should be attached to the term "coward". The actions of a coward are usually self-serving, self-protecting, and specifically designed to avoid personal harm/destruction. These personal motivations as practiced by individuals, are noble, sane, and appropriate. Thus the "label" of coward, if applied under current definitional parameters, should be worn with pride, by individuals. When a society/government as a whole has core public policies that are cowardly, the degree of nobility and appropriateness certainly diminishes, but only because it is the public policies themselves, rather than the "cowardly" execution of such policies, that are perverse and unjustifiable. Let us take the most powerful warmongering society on this planet, america, as an example. America has always utilized supreme and utter cowardice in all of it's military actions/wars, and of course continues to do so. Without a trace of shame, america deploys ultra high technology mass murder weaponry, such as fighter jets and bombs, against war adversaries who have absolutely no type of defense of any kind against these specific weapons. No way, no chance, no possibility of defending against the weapons, simply because their technology has not reached the level of american weapons technology. America chose to transport atomic/nuclear bombs thousands of miles from it's own territory and deliberately drop such bombs upon a densely populated, utterly helpless and defenseless foreign nation that it had demonized, knowing with certainty that hundreds of thousands of people would be brutally killed as a direct result of their chosen action, in a completely indiscriminate manner, men, women, children, military soldiers, and civilians. From any sane, rational perspective, the dropping of atomic/nuclear bombs by America upon Japan, has to be considered the single most cowardly, most overtly genocidal wartime action of the Modern Era, by any society or government on planet earth. The fact that civilians were "targeted", in an utterly genocidal manner, with absolutely no regard for the number of casualties, is undeniable. Therefore, for the american government/society to have the audacity to condemn and demonize, as an example, Osama bin-Laden and the Taliban society for allegedly trying to kill a lot of american civilians on 9/11/01 via four plane hijackings and deliberate crashes, is the ultimate in insane hypocrisy. By any standard imaginable, the nuclear attack launched by america against Japan was far more malevolent, far more unjustifiable, far more genocidal in nature. Even from a casualty numbers perspective, there is no comparison, since even in a "best" case scenario the alleged Osama bin-Laden attacks could not have been expected to kill more than 50,000 people, while the american nuclear attacks had a limitless number of potential casualties, since it was impossible to accurately determine the genocidal killing capability of those atomic bombs, but it was known that their killing capacity exceeded that of any other weapon that had ever been used by any society on planet earth, prior to the choice that american societal leaders made, to use these weapons against Japan during an insane war ritual.

So, the first Truth we have here is that the societies which claim to have the greatest moral justification for the wars they engage in, and which claim the moral high ground by saying that they try to avoid targeting civilians, are in fact the most morally bankrupt and genocidally evil in the world. On top of everything else, they absolutely do target civilians to a greater degree, and in a completely unnecessary manner, as america did and continues to do. But since most active duty military soldiers are in fact children, and there is absolutely no sanely and legitimately valid distinction that can be made between military humans and civilian humans, this particular point is quite moot. The much more important point is that the most warmongering societies/governments are also the most cowardly, even though all wars are operated and structured by societal leaders and their empowered agents, within a design parameter that involves utter cowardice. A society that is much weaker technologically, if it wishes to engage in a war with a technologically superior society, naturally needs to employ creative methods of attack, that are more likely to deliberately try and avoid direct technological confrontation with the superior mass murdering technology of their chosen enemy. This is commonsense cowardice. America choose to fly planes carrying bombs so high above the airspace of Afghanistan, that no technological weapon that their chosen enemy possesses, is capable of reaching the attack plane in order to bring it down. America chose to transport and then drop atomic bombs on a defenseless enemy thousands of miles away, knowing that this was the easiest way to commit genocide while minimizing all risk of significant casualties to "their" side. A society apparently led by Osama bin-Laden chose to try to deliberately crash four airplanes into four large and highly populated buildings in america, having made the tactical decision that such an attempt would provide an opportunity to maximize the casualty count of their enemy, without suffering a devastating casualty count themselves. All of these actions can and should be appropriately labeled as "cowardly", but there is no need or justification to attach any type of significantly negative connotations to this label. War itself is a cowardly act, undertaken by societal leaders. Individual actions authorized, planned, and undertaken with the war itself, will naturally reflect the cowardly structure of the war ritual itself. Within any rational analysis, the degree of cowardice displayed by america, the most technologically advanced society of the world, in terms of it's war actions, far exceeds the degree of cowardice displayed by the 9/11/01 airplane attacks upon america, as an example. In war, societies and governments that face a completely overwhelming tactical and technological disadvantage naturally and appropriately resort to using innovative, "surprise" attacks, because it simply would not be a fair, winnable, or even survivable war if they tried to fight it according to the perverse "rules" set down and decreed by their overwhelmingly advantaged enemy. The specific targeting of civilians by the severely disadvantaged side in a war, is a natural tactical decision, which, to a degree, provides a bit of balance in terms of evening out the technological disadvantage that exists. For the technologically advantaged side to condemn and demonize this "targeting of civilians", when it in reality does the exact same thing to an even more genocidal and unjustifiable degree and extent, and employs war techniques and methodologies that are even more cowardly in nature, represents the ultimate in outrageous hypocrisy.

The term terrorist is nothing more than a demonizing label, completely invalid, that technologically and militarily superior societies/governments use, to try and establish a claim of moral superiority, by condemning the military tactics employed by the disadvantaged side, which naturally feels that it must use innovative, "surprise" types of attacks, and avoid directly facing up to the superior military strength of their opponent, in order to avoid suffering devastating casualties to their smaller, weaker, less technologically advanced forces. These military tactics, including the targeting of "unarmed civilians", are completely appropriate, within the context of the insane war ritual, when analyzed at from any rational perspective. The militarily advantaged side never passes up an opportunity to use every advantage at their disposal, to genocidally harm/murder the militarily disadvantaged side. They never "fight fair", they will launch a devastating bomb from so far away that the disadvantaged side has absolutely no chance of any kind to defend themselves from the bomb. Therefore the notion that the disadvantaged side has some type of a moral obligation to not take advantage of an opportunity to target the unarmed, or civilian members of the enemy that they are engaged in a war in, is absolutely ludicrous. Terrorists are enraged torture victims of both their own society and in most cases an outside, bullying/warmongering society as well. They seek cathartic vengeance just as any murderer does, although oftentimes they operate within a war ritual sphere, in terms of allowing someone else, a "leader", to instruct and guide exactly when, where, and how, they launch their attack. It must be clearly understood that despite the fact that the terrorist would in most cases be more accurately reflecting his rage and hate by targeting the society that he was born into and raised up with, as is the case with all soldiers and killers, there is absolutely no basis from which any warmongering society can make a legitimate claim of moral superiority or justification, in demonizing any terrorist, or any terrorist "act". In war, each side is completely immoral. Each side employs utterly malevolent tactics, for utterly malevolent reasons, for the purpose of trying to achieve utterly malevolent goals. The notion that a terrorist, usually working for the militarily weaker side, is somehow "violating the rules" by not giving the enemy society a "good opportunity" to stop/kill him before he can accomplish his chosen act of vengeance, is ludicrous.

As to the issue of "is a terrorist a freedom fighter and what is the difference between the two?" This question might be interesting to contemplate, but it is not really valid. The reality is that no society/government offers genuine freedom to it's citizen-slaves. Only the illusion of freedom is provided. Therefore, no military enlistee or "terrorist" attacker who is acting on behalf of a government or a societal ideology, deserves to carry the title of "freedom" fighter. If they wish to label themselves as a freedom fighter, in order to create greater moral justification for their actions within their own minds, so be it. The fact is, the terrorist is seeking cathartic vengeance, and usually, to some degree, using a political ideology/rationalization to try and establish a stronger moral justification in his own mind/perception of reality, for undertaking the act of vengeance. The term "freedom fighter" does not validly apply, neither does the demonizing label of "terrorist", so the question of whether a person is a terrorist or a freedom fighter, has no factually valid answer. The person is a seeker of personal, cathartic vengeance, and whatever justification(s) he may or may not feel he needs to make to himself, are his business. "Fighting for freedom" is nothing more than a patriotic brainwashing/lie that societies, governments, and even "terrorist leaders" employ, to win over loyal supporters, to make them willing to kill and risk death. The "terrorist" who fervently believes that he is fighting for freedom more than likely tilts more towards being a "traditional" soldier, while the "terrorist" who fervently believes that he is seeking and claiming vengeance for personal injustices and suffering endured, more than likely tilts more towards being a traditional "murderer". But these shades of gray are not really relevant in terms of our search for Truth, since the term terrorist is itself invalid, nothing more than a demonizing label, and the traditional " illegal murderer" actually carries more of a moral justification to his actions, than the traditional soldier who commits murder of complete strangers solely and blindly upon the command of his boss.

A far more important Truth regarding the issue of "terrorism" is this: Every existing governmental regime attained it's power via the overtly malicious undertaking of and commission of, genocidally terroristic actions. Therefore, america is not simply "guilty of committing terrorist acts", but rather it is a "terrorist regime". The regime itself, the government itself, is a terrorist government. America would not exist today, were it not for the fact that the founders and leaders of america chose to undertake and commit literally tens of thousands of individual acts of terrorism, which murdered literally millions of human beings. So, for a terrorist regime that is guilty of committing tens of thousands of acts of terrorism, to adopt a position of moral authority to condemn and to demonize other terrorist regimes/groups, most of which have undertaken far fewer and far less prolifically deadly acts of terrorism, represents perverse hypocrisy at it's zenith. Let us clearly understand the operational Truth of this societal perversion: All existing governments were created via acts of violent, deadly, terrorism. This makes all existing governments terrorist states, guilty of terrorism, their very existence a testament to the fact that they are terrorist states. Now, once a malevolent regime has seized complete power and control over a territory and declared itself to be the "ruler", it sets about the task of winning over and maintaining public support for the legitimacy of it's regime. It does this by insanely decreeing that it is a legitimate regime and that anyone who wishes to topple the existing regime is an "evil terrorist", despite the fact that this "evil terrorist" would be doing nothing more than what the existing malevolent regime did, in it's terroristic seizing of power/territory. Do you understand this Truth, folks? Do you appreciate how deranged you must be, to accept this most incredible of societal hypocrisies, as having validity?? The society that you are enslaved and addicted to, the society that terroristically holds you as it's citizen-slave, came to power via the commission of brutal acts of terrorism. It is a terrorist state. And yet in order to demonize and justify destroying/launching wars against other groups, governments, and individuals, it labels them as being "evil terrorists", the exact same "crime" that it itself is supremely guilty of! And you pathetic creatures buy into it, "that terrorist must be evil because he seeks to destroy/topple my government", is what you say and believe, insanely unable to recognize a Truth so obvious that it nearly slaps you in the face, the Truth that your government not only "sought/tried" to commit terroristic genocide, but in fact actually committed, actually succeeded in committing, such brutal and deadly acts of terrorism so as to destroy and topple other governments/societies.

So, governments/societies such as america and england are foundationally terrorist in design and in structure. What do I mean by this term, foundationally terrorist? I mean that not only do these governments commit terrorism, but their entire operational structure is based upon the ritualistic commission of terrorism upon other societies and governments. America came into existence via a terrorist invasion of a sovereign land, accompanied by the mass murder of millions of human beings, and ever since it came into existence via this ultimate act of terrorism, it has ritualistically sought to impose it's evil, fascist, insane agenda and ideologies upon other large foreign groups of individuals, as well as other societies/nations. Only a small handful of the most evil and diseased societies/governments are Foundationally Terrorist in operational and design structure. Certainly neither afghanistan nor the Taliban group are Foundationally Terrorist, they are simply victims of and represent a response to, the injustices, victimizations, and provocations that one of the few Foundationally Terrorist governments in the world, america, chose to commit against/upon them. The most fascinating aspect of this situation, from a Truth-based/philosophical perspective, is how the most evil societies/governments, those few that are genuinely terroristic on a Foundational level, are not only the most insanely strident in terms of condemning other individuals, groups, and societies/governments for engaging in "terrorism", but also manage to achieve fantastic, nearly universal success in terms of totally stripping their own citizen-slaves of the ability to recognize/appreciate the fact that their own society is 100% guilty of practicing, on a much more genocidal scale, the exact same actions of "terrorism" that they, as individuals, are hypocritically, mindlessly, agreeing to condemn and demonize, upon the command of their Foundationally Terrorist societal/governmental leaders!

That wars are artificial extensions of the homicidal rage of supreme leaders of societies, is beautifully illustrated by the fact that human society tries to establish "rules" on how wars are to be fought. For example, each side tries to kill members of the other side, but bizarrely, if one army captures some members of the other army, or if some members of the other military decide to surrender and give up, the killing of those who did or would have tried to kill you, is decreed to be inappropriate. You can keep those military folks as prisoners, but you cannot torture them, even though if they hadn't surrendered or been captured, you would be praised and rewarded by your military bosses for killing them. You see folks, these rules reveal war to be what it is, a game played by your supreme leaders. A genocidal game, an immoral game, but nevertheless, still a game. You citizen-slaves are the pawns, you pay with your lives, as your leaders decide exactly who to play with, how much human capital to put up for sacrifice, etc... Establishing these types of insane "war rules" allows supreme leaders to maintain an illusion of moral justification and perverse "civility", even as they sacrifice the lives and the sanity of thousands/millions of their own citizen-slaves, as well as thousands/millions of enemy humans, in order to satiate their own homicidal rage and gain political popularity. Only the most insane mind could genuinely feel "moral outrage" at the thought of an enemy society torturing/murdering "your" POW's, prisoners of war, even as your own society is engaged in a genocidal war in which it is trying, by all possible means and methods, to kill enemy strangers, on your behalf, using a "proper rules of war" rationale that makes not an iota of rational sense.

In the vast majority of wars, the supreme leader sees his popularity and public support/praise for him and his regime spike upward, as soon as he announces that he is undertaking a war, or immediately after initiating a war, and in the weeks, months that follow. Why does this occur? Is it because the pathetic citizen-slaves start to feel scared for their own safety and so decide that they need to rally around and support their supreme leaders, fearing the consequences of their new "enemy" winning the war? To a degree, yes. But a much more primary reason is the cathartic release of rage that the collective populace feels newly free to direct towards the demonized enemy, as soon as their supreme leader "tells" them that their society is launching a war and will be killing human beings who just happen to be members of the demonized society/nation, on their behalfs. Remember, as I've already revealed, you diseased creatures are constantly searching for human beings to demonize, to harm, to kill, within the framework of receiving moral justification and legitimization from your societal leaders. A declaration or initiation of war by your society, accompanied with propaganda that demonizes the new enemy, provides you with the moral justification and legitimization that you seek. This makes you feel, emotionally, very good and happy. You have a whole new universe of human beings that you can direct your homicidal rage against, not just in terms of personally trying to kill them, but even more in terms of cathartically savoring their victimization and deaths. You don't need to personally kill them in order to relieve at least some of your suppressed homicidal rage, you just need to hear about, read about, integrate within your own mind, the reality of these murders that are being committed in your name, on your behalf, with an illusion of moral legitimacy and justification, by your societies. Your societal leader provides you with both the demonized victims to kill/savor the deaths of, and the moral justification required for you to emotionally rejoice in the deaths while still retaining the illusion of moral superiority. And this is the primary reason why the supreme leader's popularity and "approval rating" among his citizen-slaves goes up, as soon as he announces or initiates a war.

You will never see a supreme leader come to power in a seriously diseased society, if he overtly supports the elimination of any type of legal murder. Doesn't matter if it's war, abortion, the death penalty, hunting, etc... If he is trying to attain a supreme leadership position, no matter the political system, and if he overtly decrees an intention to ban/stop/criminalize abortion, hunting, the death penalty, war, he will not become the supreme leader. He will lose too many votes, or too much public support, and this is because you diseased citizen-slaves have a vested interest in keeping as many forms of legal murder open, legal, available for you to engage in personally, and available for you to cathartically savor the commission of by others within your society, and by your society itself. It is how you relieve your own immense, usually suppressed and denied rage and hate, over the many abuses, suffering, pain, injustice, and trauma that you yourselves, as individuals, experience at the hands of your society. You do not all emotionally revel in all forms of legal murder, but in an ultra-diseased society like america, enough of you are hard-core devotees of every currently available form of legal murder, that nobody could be elected as the supreme leader if he stridently opposed and declared an intention to stop/ban/criminalize, even a single one of the many different types of legal murder. Women are very interested in protecting and preserving the only form of legal murder that has been specifically set aside for their use, that would be abortion. Hunting is more targeted by society for men, as a way to legally murder. The death penalty and war are targeted equally to both genders. The fact that it is men who do almost all of the actual murdering within wars, does not prevent women from cathartically savoring, on an emotional level, the murders that their society is sanctioning, legitimizing, and having committed on their behalf.

Now we come to a very important issue: Notwithstanding the fact that the vast majority of all human beings living within ultra-diseased societies are already severely mentally ill, the job of being a soldier, of being an immature child who is brainwashed into agreeing to kill complete strangers on command, causes a tremendous additional degree of catastrophic mental illness among human beings. Throughout human history, soldiers, most especially those who are forced to actually participate in wars, suffer severe emotional and psychological breakdowns and collapses, at a rate that far exceeds that of any other specific group of people identified by their "employment". The fact that there is a significant increase in the rate of severe psychological collapse among military enlistees who actually get to fight in a war, when compared to military enlistees who serve during peaceful periods of time when no active war occurs or is underway, proves that it is the actual reality of being forced by one's own society/government to try and murder complete strangers, which primarily causes the greatest degree of emotional distress, leading to severe psychological problems that often last for the rest of victim's lifetime. Some will argue that the horror of seeing fellow soldiers, "friends", die, causes the most psychological damage. Others might claim that the fear of being killed during battle, causes the most mental distress. But no, while there are many different horrific aspects to the toxic, societally induced war ritual, which can and do cause extreme psychological distress, and certainly for some soldiers the two experiences listed above will provide the most distress, in the majority of cases it will be the specific act of being commanded to kill complete strangers, and actually carrying out this command, that causes the most severe, the most long-lasting, and the most harmful psychological consequences. There is nothing unnatural about feeling homicidal rage, or even acting upon/expressing that rage via extreme violence, for torture victims who grow up in ultra-diseased societies. To feel homicidal rage is quite normal, for a majority of people who are born into and raised up within ultra-diseased societies. In point of fact, most people who commit "illegal" murders of their own "free will", keeping in mind of course that free will is absolutely limited to the individual parameters of each person's perception of their True Reality, do not find themselves to be terribly burdened, psychologically and emotionally, by their actions. They do not suffer mental breakdowns, because the actions they undertake, while decreed by society to be illegal, are accurate reflections of the sum total of their own life experiences, within the parameters of the deranged structure of their societies. In other words, when an individual commits murder of his own free will, even if his victim is a complete stranger or someone who has never directly caused him any harm, there is an absolutely genuine degree of perceived True Reality entitlement within the murder process, which is in fact a claiming of personal vengeance. However, within the form of murder that carries the label of "war", there is often not a genuine perception of True Reality entitlement to the murders that are committed, because an artificial, invalid enticement, via brainwashing and coercion, has been created for the individual by the very society that is responsible for the victimization that he has experienced and been subjected to, which has manipulated and guided his homicidal rage. The war ritual does not create or initiate this homicidal rage, but it does manipulate and guide/steer the rage, in an unnatural, invalid manner. This is why there is a tremendous difference between a soldier killing a complete stranger within war, and a serial, mass, or other "killer" committing an illegal act of murder upon a complete stranger. At first glance, to the shallow-minded, it may seem as though there is a great deal of similarity, because complete strangers are killed in both cases. But in fact there is no real similarity in terms of perceived personal justification. The "illegal" killer usually possesses a major amount of genuine, deeply felt and emotionalized, justification. He carries out his murder(s) to satisfy his own genuine rage and hate, on his own timetable, against his own chosen targets. That is why relatively few mental breakdowns occur among such killers, after they carry out their acts of personal vengeance. However, the "legal", wartime killer of enemy humans rarely possesses any genuine, deeply felt and emotionalized justification for the specific murders he commits. This is because his murders are being artificially induced and he has in fact been convinced to carry out murder not in his own name, not to avenge himself, not to claim personal vengeance, but rather to commit his murder(s) on behalf of others, on behalf of a society, and worst of all, in most cases on behalf of the very same society that is guilty of his lifelong victimization and brutalization.

Lets be clear, some illegal murderers absolutely do suffer mental breakdowns in the wake of their actions. After all, societies mercilessly try to brainwash all citizen-slaves into believing that they have no right of any kind to claim personal vengeance that it has chosen to decree as "illegal". But most illegal murderers recognize, on some level, to some degree, that they had a True Reality right to choose to seek and claim the personal vengeance that they ended up attempting to claim. But in war, there is no free will at all. There is only brainwashing and coercion, specifically designed for the purpose of getting the child-enlistee to emotionally agree to kill complete strangers upon command. Even homicidally enraged children who enlist in the military specifically hoping to have the opportunity to kill fellow humans, which constitutes a majority of enlistees in ultra-diseased societies, tend to suffer negative psychological consequences after being subjected to this type of brainwashing and coercion, of being compelled to actually carry out the murders of complete strangers, not of their own free will, but upon the command of empowered agents of the very society that is responsible for their victimization and for instilling the homicidal rage that they feel, within their True Reality. The sane, rational, natural direction of rage by individuals, within a societal framework, is towards the society that is responsible for victimizing and causing the individual to feel rage. When the society instead coerces, convinces, terrorizes, and entices it's own victim-creation to direct his rage and hate upon a "foreign" society, upon complete strangers whose society has had nothing directly to do with the personal victimization and resulting rage that the individual is experiencing, we have an irrational, unnatural, dynamic which is created, and it specifically causes severe mental breakdowns and often an inability by the individual to function within the society that has victimized him, after the war comes to an end.

Obviously not all wartime legal murderers suffer such psychological breakdowns, some simply savor the opportunity given to them to finally exact some vengeance upon humanity as a whole, others cling to their delusions that they did a "good", patriotic thing in helping society to kill demonized foreigners, even as they continue to sublimate and bury the pain of their own abuse and victimization, as they try to "adjust" to civilian life, or as they try to extend their military service for as long as possible, hoping to get another chance to cathartically revel in the commission of legal murder during another war. This whole issue of mental illness/psychological breakdown, to be discussed by me in a future essay, is fairly complex and difficult to pin down in terms of concrete facts that are universally applicable, because of the fact that society itself is structured along utterly insane and deranged lines, thus compelling all individuals, even your humble Seer of Forbidden Truth, believe it or not, to experience at least some degree of personal mental illness and dysfunction, within their lives. Embracing and bathing in the glory of Forbidden Truth on all issues, as I do, definitely keeps all mental dysfunction at a bare minimum. But lets understand that with every single structural design, ideology, and primary institution of society operating on completely insane precepts, it is simply not possible for any individual, no matter how Superior he may be, to filter out 100% of the constant societal insanity, for every single day of the person's life, in terms of not being emotionally/psychologically impacted by the limitless waves of insanity that flow into our consciousness. The bottom line right here, on this issue, is that the degree, severity, and frequency of severe mental illness/dysfunction among individuals, is greatly increased by the insane societal ritual of war. And individual victims, labeled as "soldiers", who are compelled by this ritual to try and murder complete strangers, a demonized "enemy" that their own society orders them to murder, suffer the most severely negative emotional consequences of any specific "profession" in existence.

Many legal wartime murderers go on to commit illegal murder once the war has ended and the opportunity to commit additional legal wartime murders is taken away from them. This is perfectly normal and to be expected, of course. The distinctions that the legal/judicial system of societies make, in labeling a form of murder such as war to be legal, while decreeing the exact same act, a murder of a complete stranger, lacking only the "command of a superior boss", to be illegal, are utterly ridiculous and nonsensical. The illegal form of murder is in fact much more easily justified, and much more genuinely justifiable, within the true and genuine individual experience of life of the vast majority of human beings. To kill a complete stranger upon the command of another human being, is unnatural. To kill a complete stranger via individual free will, can often be completely natural, an accurate, cathartic reflection of personal rage and hate. Even in the cases when it is not "completely" natural, it is still almost always more natural than a war murder, in which the individual has literally no control or say in who they are killing, when they kill, or the ability to decide not to kill. One of the greatest outrages that Truth-seekers must recognize, is this insane double standard, under which societies praise and reward their citizen-slaves for committing legal wartime murder, and then turn around and demonize/condemn not only all people who commit illegal murder, but in fact these very same citizen-slaves, if they should go on to commit additional, "unauthorized", illegal acts of murder once their wartime service as a hired/brainwashed murderer, has come to an end. This is utterly mind-boggling! It is the exact same act, only there is less legitimate moral justification for the wartime murders, and yet the wartime murderer receives praise and honor, while the "criminal" murderer receives demonization and punitive punishment!

Your evil societies take a helpless child, encourage him to murder, provide him with weapons to commit murder with, demonize human beings to the child, strip the child of any genuine respect for life that he may still possess within his True Reality, order the child to murder complete strangers, praise and reward the child for successfully murdering complete strangers, threaten to punish the child if he should refuse to murder complete strangers. And after doing all this, literally turning the child into a mindless mass murderer on your behalf, you have the audacity, the gall, the mind-boggling hypocrisy, to condemn, demonize, and punitively punish this child, even to murder him outright, if he should commit any "unauthorized" acts of murder, after his career as a soldier, his career as a legal murderer, has ended. Unbelievable! Of course we have to keep in mind that the vast majority of all soldiers who suffer mental breakdowns do not go on to commit illegal murders. It's far worse, as the vast majority go on to ritualistically destroy their own lives. committing suicide either dramatically, or slowly, via alcohol, drugs, etc..., as they desperately try to cope with, in reality to escape from, the horrific Truth and fact that their society terroristically forced them to commit completely unnatural and unjustified murder of complete strangers, via the war ritual. Every war spawns a new generation of mental breakdowns. And in point of fact, the more "morally righteous" a society/government pretends it is in it's participation in a war, the greater the number of soldiers who suffer severe mental breakdowns, is likely to be. This is because there is no genuine basis for any claim of moral righteousness by any society/government that chooses to participate in the war ritual, and a constant, fervent claim by a society to it's citizen-slaves that the war and the genocide that was committed was in fact morally righteous, only tends to increase the stress level and the mental/emotional anxiety/distress of any soldier who is or has begun to realize the Truth of what exactly what he was brainwashed and manipulated into doing as a societally employed mass murderer.

Some of you shallow-minded humans would claim that yes, it did look like the Vietnam War spawned a large number of severe mental breakdowns, with many Vietnam veterans becoming homeless, drug and alcohol addicts, committing suicide, becoming criminals, and generally being unable to adjust to civilian life, but at the same time, you will argue that this did not occur in the wake of world war 2, because america was definitely fighting an undeniably "righteous" war in WW2. Would this be an accurate theory? Of course not! The fact is that in the 1940's and 1950's, most citizen-slaves in america who showed the slightest indications of a mental breakdown, were hauled off and thrown into a psychiatric prison. Severe mental breakdowns were kept hidden from the general public. There was no investigative reporting, mental illness/breakdown was decreed to be a tragically mysterious occurrence, with the victim himself blamed for not being "strong" enough to cope with "normal" life. Nobody in a position of psychiatric or cultural authority was even trying to create a link between the fact of citizen-slaves being forced by their society to murder complete strangers, and the fact of those same citizen-slaves suffering an incredibly high degree of mental breakdowns afterwards. The Truth is, percentage-wise, at least as many world war 2 veterans suffered severe, crippling, mental breakdowns as a direct result of the genocidally evil american war efforts, as did Vietnam veterans. Only difference is that the torment of the Vietnam victims was and is more visible to the general public, in terms of public homelessness, some investigative reporting, a few high profile crimes, and the psychiatric policy of de-institutionalization that american society chose to undertake in the early 1970's, after societal leaders decided it was becoming too expensive to house all of the millions of severely mentally ill torture victims that it had and was/is continuing, to create.

A majority of all infamous american serial and mass killers did serve in the american military, and a perfect early example of a torture victim-creation of world war 2 who went on to pioneer the lone gunman mass murder rampage era in america, is Howard Unruh. Howard Unruh was a sniper for the united states army in world war 2. He spent over three years killing complete strangers, and received numerous awards, ribbons and battle stars, from his military superiors. He was an honored sharpshooter, praised and rewarded for picking off and murdering complete strangers, on behalf of american society, and he was honorably discharged when world war 2 ended. On September 6, 1949, 4 years after world war 2 and his opportunity to commit legal murder had ended, had in fact been taken away from him by american society, the same society that literally compelled him to begin committing legal murder on it's behalf when he was a child aged 20 or 21, still only 28 years old in 1949, an age when the typical child is just beginning to reach the lowest levels of genuine emotional maturity, our torture victim went on a shooting rampage through the streets of his hometown in New Jersey. In about 12 minutes time, he shot thirteen people dead, and wounded numerous others, demonstrating that he had not lost the precious sharp-shooting/sniping skill that his diseased society had so honored and rewarded him for, just 4-7 years earlier. This was the single most deadly lone gunman rampage in american history, as of 1949, and Howard kept this record all the way until 1966, before Charles Whitman finally surpassed him. This is a perfect example of how ultra-diseased societies not only create all of their "criminals", but overtly cause and inspire them to kill. Such societies have no respect for any citizen-slave's welfare or life. They torture children, then turn their own torture victims into legal murderers, in order to relieve the suppressed homicidal rage that exists within the True Reality of almost all citizen-slaves, then they have the audacity to blame, demonize, punitively punish these very same tortured victim-creations that it employed to commit murder for the purpose of relieving the collective homicidal rage that exists within the society itself. How utterly perverse!

And of course there was absolutely no psychiatric or cultural acknowledgment of any kind, that american society, the american government's choice to engage in genocidal war rituals, was directly responsible for turning Howard Unruh into a murderer, both a legal and an "illegal" murderer. In fact, the most highly respected psychiatrists went out of their way to perversely rule out any "connection" between his "honorable" military service as a legal murderer, and his "shocking and terrible" rampage of illegal murder a few years later, even though any sane thinker recognizes that there is obviously an absolute, complete, and extreme connection. As always, psychiatrists acted as societal whores, validating and legitimizing the insane doctrines and decrees of the mentally deranged society that they themselves were and of course still are, beholden citizen-slaves to. Dr. Edward Strecker, then the professor of psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania Medical College, and the head shrink who probably spent more time "examining" Howard after his rampage than any other shrink, insanely concluded and publicly decreed: Killings such as these cannot be traced to military service. How ridiculous! This quote is from They Shoot To Kill: A Psycho-Survey of Criminal Sniping, by Ronald Tobias. To be strictly accurate, it is of course true that the root cause of homicidal rage in individuals is not military service or the insane war ritual, but rather the sum total of brutal victimization and abuse that societies choose to undertake and commit, as public policy, against their children. At the same time however, the legitimization and the enthusiastic practice of some forms of murder by society, has to be recognized as rendering all forms and types of murder to be perfectly legitimate and valid, which means that every form of murder should be legal, and not subject to any type of condemnation or demonization, much less the infliction of punitive punishment, by society.

Even though I again must make it clear that I do not agree with all of the conclusions reached by the author of the following essay, I do strongly recommend that seekers of Truth read it and try to understand the fundamental premise of Truth that is revealed, namely, that all war constitutes a restaging of childhood abuse, trauma, and victimization, by societal leaders, for the purpose of trying to alleviate their own mental distress/insanity/lust for vengeance, as well as to appease and satiate the collective mental distress and rage of the masses of citizen-slaves that they rule over. Here is the url link for this essay:
Restaging Early Traumas in War and Social Violence
The one thing that I find distressing about this otherwise very insightful essay, is the fact that fetal and infant abuse/victimization is implied to more directly inspire the mental derangements that lead to an embrace of the war ritual, than abuse and victimization that occurs a bit later in children's lives. Certainly fetal and infant abuse plays an extremely major role, but no more of a role than the vicious abuse that almost all children continue to be subjected to throughout their entire childhoods. A better essay that does focus much more on the abuses and tortured suffered by supreme leaders of warmongering societies, would be:
War as Righteous Rape and Purification

To conclude this particular vein of Truth, the war ritual exists as an exact parallel to the overall, genocidally malevolent policy of mass child victimization, that societies choose to commit upon and undertake against, their very own children, the children who are born into the society. War exists and occurs, because ultra-diseased and deranged societies choose to legitimize and undertake the brutal, ongoing abuse of their own children, as a matter of core public policy. War is simply a reflection of the thirst for vengeance that dwells within the True Reality of both supreme leaders of societies, and citizen-slaves of societies, both of whom are victims of their own societal malevolence.

Societies such as america commit genocide upon each and every generation of their own children, overt, absolute genocide. Wars are accurate reflections of this genocide, expressed by surviving victims of the genocide upon a demonized foreign group. As long as the illusion of moral justification is provided by the leaders of a society, no matter how ridiculously hypocritical and invalid the illusion may be, the vast majority of citizen-slaves will eagerly embrace and accept the justification, due to an immense, collective, subconscious rage and desperate emotional need to commit genocide that exists within the masses of citizen-slaves, whose own society has already undertaken and committed absolutely brutal abuse, victimization, and genocide upon them, when they were children.

The entire structure of a society like america, every aspect of it, the political, cultural, economic, entertainment, ideological, judicial, educational, military structures, all operate and function in a completely deranged manner. What do I mean by "deranged"? I mean insane, irrational, illogical, hypocritical, lie-based, deliberately set up to abuse, victimize, harm, kill people, on a mass, genocidal scale. Every structure and institution is lie-based, specifically designed and operated in such a way as to keep all genuinely profound Truth hidden, suppressed, and denied. None of you creatures have any True idea of why you are doing the things you do, why you believe the things that you do, why you live your lives as you do. All of your beliefs in this regard are false and invalid. There is no Truth on any issue, because every last trace of genuine Truth has been stripped out of the culture, to the degree where Truth cannot even be recognized anymore even if it is thrown directly into your face, as I, your humble Seer of Forbidden Truth, am doing in this Manifesto. You creatures flee in terror from Truth, from all Truth, in reflection of the daily, lifelong diet of insane lies that your society is built upon, and has subjected you to each and every day of your lives. I say all this here, because I want you creatures to understand that if you find yourself shocked, amazed, and incredulous at my essays of Truth, and reject them as being "untrue", as I'm sure the vast majority of you will, that is the reason why. Truth is not even recognizable to you creatures! There is very little chance that any of you can or will embrace the Truths I am revealing about war, or any other issue in this manifesto, because facing up to these Truths would have to involve an ability to recognize Truth, and you folks have been totally stripped of this ability by your evil societies. On top of that, you'd also have to face up to the fact that your beloved societies are insane, as well as totally bereft of all decency, morality, and "humanity", and therefore you, individually, in choosing to be and to live as a member of society, are also insane, immoral, malicious, and literally inhumane, despite the fact that you are human. How many of you creatures can find the courage and strength of character to face up to these Truths? Certainly no more than one in a million, at most. And yet I will spend 3-4 years of my precious, irreplaceable life, creating this Manifesto in written form, because the value of Truth is limitless and timeless. It does not need to be embraced, accepted, or recognized as Truth, by any living thing, in order to retain it's sacred value.

Okay, a few final Truths on this war issue. Ultra-diseased societies function within a pattern of addictive genocide. Just as a heroin addict repeatedly plays out the same "pattern", of seeking out heroin, and using it to create an artificial sense of reality within his brain/mind, ultra-diseased societies victimize each generation of their own children in a genocidal manner, and each generation, even as it commits genocide upon it's own children, seeks out a foreign group to demonize, and attempts to victimize that group in genocidal fashion. This is partly due to the fact that each new adult generation that comes into power, have already been victimized themselves, in a genocidal manner. There is no moral basis to war, but no moral basis is needed, only the pretense and illusion of a moral basis, the same type of pretense under which you creatures insanely convince yourselves that you "love" your children and would never do anything to deliberately harm them, even as you sponsor their genocidal abuse, torture, and mass scale murder. It is true that societies and governments that are victimized via genocide by another society/government, within the war ritual, are far more likely to engage in additional wars, with an even greater, obsessive determination to carry out genocide themselves. This is because the amount and degree of homicidal rage within a society is increased, if there is a failure to kill a significant number of "foreign enemy" humans, in the war. "Losing" the war is less upsetting and enraging, than failing to kill large numbers of enemy humans is. And of course in many war rituals, even the losing side, using lies and propaganda, is often able to convince their pathetic citizen-slaves that their side actually won. Let us understand that societies/governments go to war for the expressed purpose and motivation of killing. There is homicidal rage within the True Reality of the supreme leader, and within the True Reality of the vast majority of his citizen-slaves, and the war is expected to serve as an outlet for this homicidal rage. Therefore, "winning" the war is a secondary consideration, the first consideration being to kill a large number of members of the demonized, enemy society, under an invalid cloak of moral justification and claimed necessity.

It is clear to any seeker of Truth that even though as I write these words america has not yet killed 5000 or more Afghanistan citizen-slaves, this figure will have to be reached before the supreme leader of this ultra-diseased society will even begin to consider calling an end to his genocidal war. In satiating his own homicidal rage as well as the homicidal rage of american citizens, he knows that it is and will be relatively easy to maintain the illusion of moral justification for killing at least 5000 demonized enemy humans, because approximately 5000 humans on "his" side were killed by the Afghanistan "side". He further knows that the vast majority of bloodthirsty americans will not be satisfied, will not have their homicidal rage satiated, unless at least 5000 "legal" murders, and most likely far more, are committed in their names, by their society, on their behalf.

Another fine example of how genocide and warmongering is addictive/reflective in nature, is the situation with the religious/societal group known as jews. Back in the late 1930's and 1940's, germany, an ultra-diseased society known for having possibly the most brutal child-rearing policies and doctrine of any society on planet earth during the early part of the 20th century, undertook a war ritual of genocide, targeting jews and other demonized enemy "outsiders", in Europe. A great many jews were in fact tortured and/or killed, while very few jews got to torture or kill germans. In other words, the war between these two particular groups was very lopsided. In the end, the germans lost the war, but this loss provided virtually no relief of homicidal rage to the jew side, because it was not the jews themselves who got to murder/torture/massacre the germans, but rather other societies, like america, which almost never passes up an opportunity to join in on a war, got to carry out the actual massacres/genocide of the german/nazi soldiers, who were of course tortured victim-creations of their society. This lack of homicidal fulfillment for the jews, carried far greater importance than the "victory" that they ended up with, in terms of the enemy, germany, being totally defeated and massacred. Immediately after this war ended, jew society began desperately searching for a new enemy to demonize and hate, an "active" enemy that they could engage in a war with. At the same time, recognizing their own vulnerability and determined to find a way to kill lots of demonized enemies themselves, they courted and established benevolent relationships with the world's most powerful and most diseased societies, such as america and britain. Then, with the strongest bully nations of the world backing them, they seized a small bit of land that they knew not only belonged to arab societies, but also that the arab societies believed this particular land to be very important, to have extreme insane god myth value to them. This land was surrounded on all sides by arab societies, and of course the jews knew that they would face constant battles, wars, attacks, as a direct result of their malicious decision to seize this sovereign territory. The point is, they wanted to face constant attacks. They wanted to goad the arab societies into attacking them, so that they would be able to establish and embrace an illusion of moral justification for the war, the ongoing, genocidal murders that they were determined to commit and to engage in. They were desperate and determined to cathartically transfer the genocide that was committed against them, onto another group/society of humans, after demonizing them and invoking the illusion of moral legitimacy, such as the insane claim that "we must defend and protect our land", even though they made the decision to seize this particular land, in that particular spot, because they knew it was extremely likely they would face ongoing attacks, and were in fact desperately hoping, to provoke and spark a war. And so for the past 50 or so years, the society/country of israel has been engaged in a genocidal war against her arab neighbors, trying to vent the homicidal rage of the masses of it's citizen-slaves upon a demonized enemy. Did they recreate concentration camps that looked the same as the germans used upon them, and torture/kill arabs in them?? No, of course not! That would ruin their illusion of moral legitimacy and the "right to kill their enemy", the exact same illusion that the nazi's used against them, and that all warmongering societies use as a moral justification for their expressions of homicidal genocide. They had to find different ways to wage their war, different ways to commit genocide, different from the nazi war methodologies, so as to retain the illusion of being the morally superior "victims" who are only defending themselves against an "evil" enemy. The reality of course, is that the israel society/government is far more evil, has far less justification for engaging in this war, initiated and is far more determined to never allow this war to end, in the foreseeable future, than the arab societies are, even though they too possess plenty of homicidal rage, being inferior societies. The amount and degree of homicidal rage that exists within jew society, is still far greater and more intense than the homicidal rage of the arabs. This is because the german genocide inflicted upon the jews was quite massive, with millions of murders and millions more tortured, and it only occurred about 60 years ago, which is not a lot of time at all, in terms of generational passage. And of course all jews passed down and will continue to pass down their immense homicidal rage, upon their children, for an indefinite period of time, it will take at the very least 1000 years of time before even the slightest possible diminishment in the degree and pervasiveness of jew homicidal rage, might occur.

At the same time however, over the past 50 years, the amount and degree of homicidal rage suffered by the arabs has grown and increased tremendously, because they have been the victims of an ongoing war in which they have taken a disproportionate number of casualties, as well as suffered brutal economic and human rights genocide, at the hands of not only israel, but the much more powerful, ultra-diseased societies like america, who have allied themselves with israel and who as always, never can or do pass up any opportunity to join in on, or to initiate, a war. Now we have enough homicidal rage built up within arab societies, as a result of the genocide that they have been subjected to for the past 50 years, for a homicidally enraged and mentally ill victim of the insane god myth, Osama bin-Laden, to be able to rally his fellow torture victims into agreeing to engage in a literally suicidal war, targeting, interestingly, not israel, but america. What makes this interesting is that the world's #1 bully nation, the greatest warmonger of them all, america, amazingly seems to feel surprised, even shocked, to be the direct target of the homicidal rage of another society/supreme leader. American societal leaders believe they should have every right to initiate and undertake limitless, utterly genocidal wars against all other societies, using weapons that are superior to that of all other societies, but only when they want to, while all other societies should just sit back and wait until america makes the decision to engage in a war with them. How perverse!

The primary point I am making is that ultra-diseased societies, especially societies that are victimized by genocide, become addicted and obsessed with committing genocide, and it is you, the citizen-slaves, who are both the pawns who pay with your lives and also the "fuel" that sparks and ignites the wars that your insane societal leaders choose to engage in, on your behalfs. It is your homicidal rage, collectively and en masse, as victims of personal, emotional, ideological abuse, traumatization, and brutalization inflicted upon you by your own societies, not by foreign societies, that serves as the fuel that powers all wars. Germany committed genocide against the jews, the jews in turn committed genocide against the arabs, the arabs in turn are now trying to continue the cycle, to relieve their homicidal rage, as a society, in the same manner as the germans, jews, and of course the americans, have done and in the case of the jews and americans, continue to do today. War is an "internationally externalized" cycle of victimization, caused by domestic internalized insanity, which is brought on by mainstream, widely accepted and embraced malevolent policies of domestic child abuse, child victimization and traumatization, committed by ultra-diseased societies against their own child-slaves.

I hope none of you creatures feel or think that I am "picking" on specific societies like america, in this essay of Forbidden Truth. I am not singling out america, any more than america deserves to be singled out. There are many ultra-diseased societies, all worthy of our profound scorn, contempt, and personal hatred. And yet in analyzing the degree, scope, and pervasive nature of governmental warmongering, it becomes completely clear and undeniable that america achieves new heights, the ultimate degree of genocidal malice, which on an ongoing basis, over the past 50 years, 100 years, even 250 years, surpasses that of any other single governmental entity. America is constantly engaging in wars, literally all of the time, most often america is juggling 2-3 wars at the same time, and as soon as one war winds down, american societal leaders already have their next war, their next chosen war partner, all picked out. The war with the soviet union was delightful to america, because it was so long-lasting and the nuclear threat could be used to demonize them. America has been at war with cuba for decades, still is at war with them. This war beautifully serves the political propaganda of the american regime, as america demonizes a society for not being "free and democratic" even though the reality is that in many ways, the government of Cuba treats it's citizen-slaves with more respect and fairness, than the american gov't treats it's citizen-slaves. Over the past 12+ years, an absolutely incredible war of genocide has been underway by america against iraq, directly resulting in the killing/death of over a million people in Iraq, at least 500,000 children. And yet, amazingly, most citizen-slaves of america do not consider themselves to even be at war at the current time, with iraq and cuba. This is what sets america apart, brands america as truly the worst of the worst, in terms of genocidal warmongering. You creatures can kill a million human beings living in a foreign society, complete strangers, individual human beings who would never have even been able to reach an american shoreline, much less kill americans, and yet not even consider yourselves and your government to be at war with the society that you have killed one million citizens of. Absolutely amazing!

Not convinced yet, folks? Okay, lets consider this Truth: America was formed via a genocidal invasion of a sovereign land. Human beings, known as "indians", occupied, owned, possessed the land mass which later became known as america. An invading army of Europeans, having never set foot on this territory before, crossed a huge ocean, found this land mass, decided that they liked it, and launched a genocidal, totally unprovoked war, for the specific purpose of annihilating the entire race of human beings who legally possessed and occupied this land mass, the native indians. The use of the word "annihilate" is very important and key, because it is truly the only word that fits. In the vast majority of wars, neither side ever comes close to killing even 10% of the population of their "enemy". In fact, 2% fatality rates in war, are probably most common. Not even the nazi's, whose entire motivation seemed to be to "annihilate" as many gypsies, jews, and other very specific groups of people, managed to kill more than 35-50%, at most, of their chosen targets, meaning members of the specific group of people that they targeted, who were living in the countries that they chose to attack/invade. But what of the European invaders who launched their genocidal war on the native indians?? Amazingly, incredibly, the european invaders managed to kill approximately 97% of all the native indians that they launched their war against, within the land mass that came to be known as america. 97%!! A 97% fatality rate in a war, this is unmatched by any society in the history of the world, even societies like the nazi's which basically admitted that they were trying to kill as many jews & gypsies as they possibly could, did not come anywhere close to achieving a 97% fatality rate. I can't even believe that Genghis Khan, Julius Caesar, Attila The Hun, or any other "prehistoric" warmonger, managed to achieve a 97% fatality rate, in any specific war that they engaged in. So don't you dare accuse me of unfairly "picking on" america in this essay. Truth stands, and I stand with Truth, always. It will not be hidden, suppressed, denied, not here, not in this Manifesto. It will shine in all it's perverse glory. America came into existence as a country, via the commission of the single most incredibly bloodthirsty war of genocide in the history of the Modern Era, and quite possible the entire history of all of humanity, via an unprovoked war that resulted in the founders of america and their hired, legal murderers fatally annihilating 97% of their chosen enemy, 97% of all native indian men, women, and children, in the single most prolifically deadly act of genocide, percentage-wise, to have ever occurred within any war, ever waged in the history of humanity.

Now, as is the case in every war, these genocidal mass murderers from Europe had to find a way to claim moral justification for launching this incredible, unprovoked, ultra-violent attack upon a sovereign land and it's inhabitants. In fact they embraced many different perverse and invalid justifications, such as the notion that the human beings living on and possessing this land were in fact nothing more than "subhuman savages" who did not deserve to possess the land. Ha! What a joke, the European invaders were tons more subhuman, tons more savage, than the native indians could ever have hoped to be, but as always, Truth stood no chance of ever being recognized, much less embraced, by the homicidally enraged invaders. I want to specifically talk about one of the insane moral justifications that was employed, not during the initial years of native indian genocide, but rather in later decades, the mid 1800's, because it ties in so beautifully to the entire ongoing derangement of humanity as regards war, racial and ethnic superiority, and " private land ownership". This moral justification came to be known as manifest destiny. Some of you may not be familiar with this term, but I will define it perfectly below, and you can also use most internet search engines to access the exact phrase of "manifest destiny", if you wish to educate yourself that way. I will also provide a link or two, for your convenience. Manifest Destiny was an "ideology" that american societal leaders devised and created in the 1830's and 1840's, for the purpose of justifying a massive, genocidal expansion, in reality of course a vicious invasion involving war, into the western and southern parts of what is now known as america, and was still, at that time, primarily occupied by native indians and native hispanics, now known as mexicans. As an ideology and philosophy, Manifest Destiny combined all of the most perverse elements of human inferiority, into one giant, toxic ball of malevolent derangement. The insane god myth, the notion of racial superiority, the notion of ethnic superiority, a doctrine of mysticism based upon irrational thought, the creation of a national notion of moral superiority, in order to cover up the Truth of immense, limitless moral inferiority and genocidal immorality. All of these perversions were combined, mixed together, and out of this toxic brew, in the 1830's and 1840's, arose the ideology of Manifest Destiny, which was used as a philosophical launching pad for the European invaders who had already committed genocide throughout middle and upper eastern portions of the north american continent, launching the second stage of their incredible rampage of malice, in invading and expanding their genocide to the west and to the south. Here are some direct Manifest Destiny quotes, from famous, influential leaders within american society in the 1930's and 1940's, which serve to illustrate the Truth I have revealed above.

John L. O'Sullivan on Manifest Destiny, 1939: The American people having derived their origin from many other nations, and the Declaration of National Independence being entirely based on the great principle of human equality, these facts demonstrate at once our disconnected position as regards any other nation; that we have, in reality, but little connection with the past history of any of them, and still less with all antiquity, its glories, or its crimes. On the contrary, our national birth was the beginning of a new history, the formation and progress of an untried political system, which separates us from the past and connects us with the future only; and so far as regards the entire development of the natural rights of man, in moral, political, and national life, we may confidently assume that our country is destined to be the great nation of futurity. Keep in mind that the above quote, proclaiming moral superiority and attempting to dismiss the "past", comes after John's society has already committed the most incredible feat of genocide imaginable, against the native indians in the eastern coast portion of america, and after american societal leaders had begun to kidnap millions of black people from africa and transport them thousands of miles against their will to work as subhuman pieces of owned property.

John goes on to say, within his Manifest Destiny decrees: It is so destined, because the principle upon which a nation is organized fixes its destiny, and that of equality is perfect, is universal. It presides in all the operations of the physical world, and it is also the conscious law of the soul -- the self-evident dictates of morality, which accurately defines the duty of man to man, and consequently man's rights as man. Besides, the truthful annals of any nation furnish abundant evidence, that its happiness, its greatness, its duration, were always proportionate to the democratic equality in its system of government. . . . What friend of human liberty, civilization, and refinement, can cast his view over the past history of the monarchies and aristocracies of antiquity, and not deplore that they ever existed? What philanthropist can contemplate the oppressions, the cruelties, and injustice inflicted by them on the masses of mankind, and not turn with moral horror from the retrospect? Absolute gobbledygook, is what this is, folks! An appeal to mystical, irrational, but most of all, completely false notions, designed to create a ridiculous sense of moral superiority and entitlement within the populace, so as to allow for the next phase of the genocidal war process to be launched, and to maintain mainstream public support for what is completely and utterly unjustifiable, from any Truth-based, or morally based perspective. Amazingly, american societal leaders in the 1840's, after already committing quite possible the most unjustifiable, immoral war of genocide of the modern era, and after officially decreeing countless millions of their fellow human beings to be nothing more than subhuman pieces of property based solely upon the coloration of their skin and the area of the world, africa, in which they reside, make the claim that the american political/governmental system is superior to all other systems, and that america is a "civilized, refined, philanthropic, morally superior" society/nation! Understand, you diseased creatures, that this insane claim is not only perverse on it's face, but what allows it to reach the ultimate in perversity, is the fact that these insane claims are being made for the specific purpose of garnering widespread support among the populace for the next stage of the genocidal war that american societal leaders had already chosen and decided to undertake.

John goes on to say: America is destined for better deeds. It is our unparalleled glory that we have no reminiscences of battle fields, but in defence of humanity, of the oppressed of all nations, of the rights of conscience, the rights of personal enfranchisement. Our annals describe no scenes of horrid carnage, where men were led on by hundreds of thousands to slay one another, dupes and victims to emperors, kings, nobles, demons in the human form called heroes. We have had patriots to defend our homes, our liberties, but no aspirants to crowns or thrones; nor have the American people ever suffered themselves to be led on by wicked ambition to depopulate the land, to spread desolation far and wide, that a human being might be placed on a seat of supremacy. Absolutely mind-boggling! His society has just spent the past half century+ doing nothing but committing "horrid carnage", unprovoked genocide, homicidal oppression of a morally superior ethnic group, a deliberately overt effort to literally "depopulate" the native indian from the face of the entire eastern portion of america. Insane notions of ethnic supremacy were and are the foundation of the existence of america, and yet this empowered agent/leader of american society in the 1940's, describing the new ideology of Manifest Destiny that his societal leaders have created out of thin air, reveals not a trace of Truth. Every single sentence he writes in describing the ideology of Manifest Destiny, is a lie, the exact opposite of the True facts. This is because Manifest Destiny is itself a lie, on every level and from every angle. It was created by american societal leaders to be an utter lie, exactly as all mainstream religions were and are specifically formulated to reveal not a single iota of Truth, but rather to brainwash, deceive, manipulate, control, and plant insane, immoral, genocidal notions into the minds of all citizen-slaves, to convince them that these insane, immoral, genocidal notions in fact represent truth, logic, sanity, morality, and benevolence.

In this same 1939 essay on Manifest Destiny, John L. O'Sullivan continues: We have no interest in the scenes of antiquity, only as lessons of avoidance of nearly all their examples. The expansive future is our arena, and for our history. We are entering on its untrodden space, with the truths of God in our minds, beneficent objects in our hearts, and with a clear conscience unsullied by the past. We are the nation of human progress, and who will, what can, set limits to our onward march? Providence is with us, and no earthly power can. We point to the everlasting truth on the first page of our national declaration, and we proclaim to the millions of other lands, that "the gates of hell" -- the powers of aristocracy and monarchy -- "shall not prevail against it." It had to happen, folks. He had to invoke the insane god myth, and he did. The insane god myth, and an insane, mystical notion that god "wants" america to commit genocide by launching an unprovoked invasion of the Western and Southern portions of the land mass, that they named america, that they had already committed the ultimate in genocide upon. Many native indians and hispanics had already fled west and south, desperately fleeing for their lives from the genocide of the europeans. But the europeans were determined to continue with their genocide, to literally pursue the fleeing natives for thousands of miles, killing all the way, with each mile of new territory that they seized. Unbelievably, John has already invoked the word "truth" twice in his essay, even though the "Truth" is that every single thought, idea, and notion that he expresses in his Manifest Destiny essay, is utterly false and untrue, not to mention insanely, malevolently hypocritical. Understand folks, that in the Truest, literal sense, the doctrine of Manifest Destiny, among other things, called upon american citizen-slaves in the 1830's and 1840's to launch a Jihad, a holy war, against defenseless, overwhelmed native indians and hispanics who were simply trying to hold on to their territory, to their land, in response to an invasion in which the europeans had literally traveled thousands of miles across a vast ocean, just to commit genocide upon them.

Manifest Destiny specifically invoked the "will of god", even a demand from god, for all loyal americans to agree and to participate in the ongoing genocide of natives. Just look at the quotes: We are entering on its untrodden space, with the truths of God in our minds, beneficent objects in our hearts, and with a clear conscience unsullied by the past. Providence is with us, and no earthly power can (set limits to our onward march). The philosophy of Manifest Destiny, as clearly expressed, is literally an exact parallel to the philosophy expressed in recent months by Osama bin-Laden in his call for a "Jihad", a holy war against america and the western societies. It's exactly the same! American societal leaders called for a Jihad in the 1830's and 1840's, this call was embraced by almost all of the american public, and in fact an incredibly genocidal Jihad, a holy war, occurred, with america slaughtering millions more natives, in genocidal fashion. How incredibly perverse it is that any of you creatures living today, have the audacity to demonize Osama, to ridicule the notion of a Jihad, a holy war, when the Truth is that your very own society/nation, if in fact you are an american, only came into existence as it is today via a genocidal, totally unprovoked war that was structured, in every sense of the term, along the exact same "holy war, Jihad, lines.

John concludes his proud decree of Manifest Destiny with: The far-reaching, the boundless future will be the era of American greatness. In its magnificent domain of space and time, the nation of many nations is destined to manifest to mankind the excellence of divine principles; to establish on earth the noblest temple ever dedicated to the worship of the Most High -- the Sacred and the True. Its floor shall be a hemisphere -- its roof the firmament of the star-studded heavens, and its congregation an Union of many Republics, comprising hundreds of happy millions, calling, owning no man master, but governed by God's natural and moral law of equality, the law of brotherhood -- of "peace and good will amongst men.". . . Yes, we are the nation of progress, of individual freedom, of universal enfranchisement. Equality of rights is the cynosure of our union of States, the grand exemplar of the correlative equality of individuals; and while truth sheds its effulgence, we cannot retrograde, without dissolving the one and subverting the other. We must onward to the fulfillment of our mission -- to the entire development of the principle of our organization -- freedom of conscience, freedom of person, freedom of trade and business pursuits, universality of freedom and equality. This is our high destiny, and in nature's eternal, inevitable decree of cause and effect we must accomplish it. All this will be our future history, to establish on earth the moral dignity and salvation of man -- the immutable truth and beneficence of God. For this blessed mission to the nations of the world, which are shut out from the life-giving light of truth, has America been chosen; and her high example shall smite unto death the tyranny of kings, hierarchs, and oligarchs, and carry the glad tidings of peace and good will where myriads now endure an existence scarcely more enviable than that of beasts of the field. Who, then, can doubt that our country is destined to be the great nation of futurity? Absolutely incredible! More mention of truth, although how any sane creature could possibly find a single word of Truth within this entire essay, is mind-boggling. More mention of god, of course. "We kill these subhuman inferior natives because god wants us to rule all of north america", that is the True message. "We are the nation of universal enfranchisement", he says, even as millions of morally superior black africans are being forced to work as subhuman slaves after being kidnapped, and millions of morally superior native indians/hispanics have been and continue to be genocidally murdered for doing nothing more than trying to protect their land. "Moral dignity, freedom, and salvation of man is our noble purpose", he declares, at the exact same time as his society is literally mass murdering millions of people because they are not european, enslaving millions more as subhuman creatures because of their skin color, and committing the ultimate in immorality. The mind reels in shock, even my Superior mind reels, in contemplating how these words of John L. O'Sullivan in describing the ideology of Manifest Destiny, as well as Manifest Destiny itself, as a public policy, were universally embraced and accepted as representing Truth and directly used to justify the massacre of literally millions of people, in the decades of genocidal war that the american government engaged in, from 1840 till the 1900's.

I have spent quite a bit of time and space here, on Manifest Destiny. I have done so because in this ideology, we see a perfect, beautiful parallel to how the vast majority of wars are waged by societies/governments. Insane ideologies, that have not a shred of Truth to them, are created and devised by societal leaders, then spread throughout the nation, by the leaders, their empowered agents, and especially in recent decades, by the media of the society. These ideologies are literally insane, so transparent that any sane thinker can see right through them. But there is a problem: Your societies are insane and lie-based, and you creatures, as citizen-slaves, born into and raised up within the insane society, are likewise insane and lie-based. You cannot even recognize Truth, much less embrace it. And so just as this insane ideology of Manifest Destiny was universally embraced by americans in 1840, so too have all of the other insane ideologies that societies have used to promote and legitimize war/genocide, been universally embraced since 1840, throughout all of human history, and they continue to be universally embraced today, by the "loyal", brainwashed, Truth-hating citizen-slaves of societies. This insane, malevolently immoral justification for a "call to war" known as Manifest Destiny, that american societal leaders undertook in the 1830's and 1840's was/is exactly the same as the justifications that Adolf Hitler used with his society, that Osama bin-Laden uses with his society, that america used to justify engaging in world war 1, world war 2, the korean war, the vietnam war, wars against iraq, panama, etc... I hope that the few Superiors who read this Manifesto of Truth can focus upon the clarity of the Manifest Destiny ideology, the incredible, undeniable nature of it's lie-based hypocrisy as expressed in the above quotes, and recognize that in every single war, every society/government that chooses to participate in the war engages in this exact same form of ideological brainwashing, in order to obtain and maintain public support for the war, and to establish and maintain the illusion of moral legitimacy and justification for the immoral genocide that is being committed on your behalf, assuming that you are a member of a society that does engage in the toxic war ritual.

It is especially worthwhile at this particular point in time, as I write these words, to note that the insane god myth has been used by the american government and by american societal leaders, to create the illusion of a justification for genocidal wartime atrocities, as proven by the ideological facts of Manifest Destiny. This renders the current demonization by the west of Osama bin-Laden and other "terrorists", for trying to invoke Allah in their calls for a "Jihad", a holy war, 100% completely and utterly hypocritical. The insane god myth has been used throughout history, by leaders of societies, for genocidal malice, this continues to be the case, and america is more guily of this perverse practice, america has caused far more atrocities to occur in the name of god, over the past 300+ years, than any other society. As proven by Manifest Destiny ideology, societal and governmental leaders will stop at nothing to create a moral justification to commit genocide through war. They will invoke god, they will lie, they will brainwash, they will provoke their chosen enemy, they will create entire ideologies that contain not a shred of Truth, that profess to represent justice, morality, benevolence, when in reality the ideology represents the ultimate in injustice, immorality, and malevolence, as proven by the Manifest Destiny ideology.

Now, it is important to note that the essay on Manifest Destiny written by John L. O'Sullivan that I have quoted above, is merely one "interpretation" of Manifest Destiny ideology. There is probably no "official" text of Manifest Destiny, but rather a huge number of different essays, articles, and interpretations that were written by societally empowered agents during the 1930's and 1940's. I obviously do not have the time or the inclination to quote them all. However, I am very confident that the quotes I have provided above do represent very accurately, the "mainstream" definitional parameters of the 1840's era american government Manifest Destiny ideology, that was used to inspire and garner public support for the american "expansion" of territory after 1940, into the west and south land mass, that resulted in the genocidal war murders of millions of people. In case any of you want to study or read more about Manifest Destiny, I would recommend the following url's:

Open Directory-Manifest Destiny
Index on Manifest Destiny
Manifest Destiny Introduction
Manifest Destiny: America the New Israel
John L. O'Sullivan on Manifest Destiny, 1839

Don't worry folks, we are nearing the end of this essay, but a few more important points must be made, or at least reemphasized. As regards the issue of child murder by warmongering societies, let us understand that the vast majority of all "active duty" soldiers who are sent to actually commit murder upon the enemy are under 28 years of age, and that they have the emotional maturity of children, not to mention the fact that some are under 21 years of age and so they carry the "legal definition" of child, even using the ridiculously invalid societal definition of age 21 constituting adulthood. We literally have armies of children, immature, brainwashed, tortured children, trying to murder each other on your behalfs. This is what the war ritual is. But going beyond this Truth, let us also understand that the most diseased of the warmongering societies, such as america in the year 2001, do overtly choose to target and to commit genocide upon the children of their demonized enemy. What do I mean by "overtly choose"? I mean that these diseased societies know with certainty that their war actions will specifically kill "civilian" children, and knowing this fact in advance, they choose to undertake these specific war actions, while either denying that they are targeting civilian children, or outrageously blaming their demonized enemy for "causing" the children to die, by not "doing the right thing" and surrendering. A perfect example of this is the genocide of Iraqi children and adults, that america has been engaged in over the past 12 straight years, while never even admitting that it is even engaged in an "official" war against iraq, much less targeting iraqi children in genocidal fashion, which is exactly what america has done and continues to do as of right now, the year 2001, as I type these words.

Make no mistake, american political and societal leaders knew 12 years ago that their outrageous economic embargo, a clear act of war against iraq, would directly cause a huge number of iraqi children to die of starvation and/or malnutrition. Sure enough, at least 500,000 children, more likely a million, have indeed died of starvation/malnutrition since america imposed it's economic embargo, and it is clear and undeniable, to any sane thinker who analyzes the situation, that it is the american embargo that is directly responsible for causing this child genocide to occur. It is also perfectly clear that american societal leaders knew even before they began the embargo, that it would cause child genocide. Then, year after year, even as undeniable proof was/is presented that not only "will" children die in genocidal fashion, but in fact iraqi children have already died and continue to die in a genocidal manner, the american government refuses to accept responsibility, refuses to put an end to the child genocide, and, insanely, blames the Iraqi society and it's leaders for causing the genocidal murder of their children, by not "surrendering and agreeing to all american demands." This is utterly insane. America is completely guilty of this ongoing child genocide. It bears all responsibility, when the issue is looked at from any rational perspective. America chose to undertake an act of war, a devastating economic embargo against a sovereign nation located thousands of miles away from it's own borders, knowing that the embargo would directly cause a devastating famine and a severe reduction in available food resources to iraqi civilians, which would certainly end up resulting in iraqi children dying in large numbers. If the american embargo were not in place, the vast majority of these children would not have died and would not be dying right now. Therefore, the american government overtly chose and continues to choose to commit child genocide as a regular, mainstream policy of war. How dare such a society accuse some other society of committing "war crimes" by targeting civilians or killing/raping unarmed enemy humans, when the society making these claims, insanely trying to adopt a position of moral superiority, is in fact choosing as an official government policy in it's own wars, to genocidally mass murder civilian children!

This is not a rare or isolated example. The most diseased society on planet earth has a long history, going all the way back to it's creation via the launching of a genocidal war against the native indians, of specifically and overtly targeting "enemy" children and civilians in it's wars, while of course never admitting to this Forbidden Truth. In the Vietnam war, america genocidally murdered right around three million Vietnamese humans, and over 50%, that's right, more than half of the 3 million murdered in this war, were not Vietnamese soldiers, but rather civilians. For a government that murders more "enemy" civilians than it does enemy soldiers, to the tune of over one and a half million civilians, with over a million of those being children and women, to claim that it is morally superior and only targets enemy soldiers, is utterly ridiculous. So let us be clear in embracing Truth: Many of the ultra-diseased, warmongering societies of humans on this planet, in terms of how they operate and structure their war rituals, absolutely do overtly target the children of their "war partner" for genocide, and no other society over the past 350 years is as guilty of repeatedly engaging in this specific form of genocide, as america is. Therefore, any claim or notion that america puts forth, that it feels the need to participate in a war because "foreign children are suffering", or "foreign children need to be saved", can only be greeted with hysterical laughter by any sane thinker, due to the fact that america is directly responsible for causing far more foreign children to suffer and die, in genocidal fashion, than any other society/country.

One of the most amusing things is how some ultra-evil societies, like america, try to assuage their guilt and desperately maintain the illusion of moral superiority, by providing "humanitarian" aid to other societies, often to the very same societies that they are engaging as war partners. This perverse hypocrisy reaches a new level in the war with afghanistan, as america is doing both of these things at the same time, dropping bombs and attempting to massacre afghani citizen-slaves, while at the same time dropping food out of airplanes onto afghani territory with the claim that america wants to "help the innocent, hungry children". The president, Bush, even initiated a "domestic campaign" to get american children to write letters to afghani children, and donate money into a fund that would be used to help starving/suffering afghani children. You see folks, the most evil society in the world has to work extra-hard to maintain a collective delusion/ideology that it is morally superior, to it's citizen-slaves. That's what this dropping of food, writing of letters, collecting of money "for the children" is, an attempt to maintain the illusion of moral decency, even as yet another genocidal war that in reality is and will directly cause genocide to children, is blood-thirstily savored. Tragically and perversely, it will work just fine as a happily embraced moral justification for genocide, just as the Manifest Destiny ideology/justification worked to perfection in the 1840's.

There is yet another child-related issue that must be emphasized here. Your societies claim to consider their children, children born into and living as citizens of the society, to be extremely valuable and important. Your societies instruct adults that they must make "sacrifices" on behalf of and for their children. "You must pay for the feeding, clothing, education of your child. You must protect your children from strangers who might want to cause them harm. You must place the needs and welfare of your children above your own needs. Your children are our future, nothing is more important than their welfare." These are very common verbal and ideological decrees/orders that societies/governments make to their adult citizens/parents, and the vast majority of adult citizens/parents claim to accept and embrace these decrees as being perfectly valid. If you diseased creatures sincerely feel this way, why do you force your children to endanger their lives by ordering them to try and massacre complete strangers on your behalfs?? Why do you choose to compel your children to sacrifice their bodies, their limbs, their mental sanity, and their lives, just because you are filled with homicidal, bloodthirsty rage?? This is what war is, you adults authorizing your societal leaders to brainwash and coerce your children, into trying to mass murder complete strangers, who have been demonized on your behalfs. Your children naturally risk their limbs, lives, and sanity, via the war ritual. Now, if you really cared about your children, if you really valued them, considered them important as individuals, and you still felt homicidal rage at the demonized enemy, you would insist upon participating in the war ritual yourselves. You would sacrifice your own safety and welfare, in order to protect your children. But no, this never happens. This has never happened in any warmongering society throughout the entire modern era of human existence. Instead, you choose to sacrifice your children on your behalf. You use your children as Poison Containers, channeling your suppressed homicidal rage into them, and using them to try and commit murder on your behalf. This is true cowardice. And I don't use this word negatively, since there is nothing wrong with protecting and preserving your own life and health/welfare. What I do condemn is your perverse refusal to face up and admit to the Truth of the matter! Admit that you are cowards. Admit that you consider your children to be subhuman slaves whose purpose in existing is to serve your perverse needs and desires, even if it involves them sacrificing their lives, limbs, and sanity, for the purpose of satiating your suppressed, misdirected, homicidal rage. That's all I ask, for starters. Simply face up to the Truth! There is no other reasonable explanation for why you "mature adults", over the age of 32, since the average age that a person reaches a decent degree of emotional/intellectual maturity is age 32, choose to allow your governments to seize, brainwash, coerce, and use your immature children, as human weapons, to commit on command the murder of complete strangers via the war ritual.

You insanely claim, as a society, to fight wars in order to try and "preserve our superior way of life for our beloved children", and yet you are terroristically compelling these very children, the ones you claim to be fighting to "protect", to risk their lives, limbs, and sanity, by fighting in the war themselves! It doesn't make any sense! If wars are fought in order to protect children, or even to protect a specific ideological "way of life", shouldn't the fighters be people who are adults, people who have supposedly already "benefited" from and enjoyed the advantages of their society's "way of life"? People who have reached adult maturity, and therefore have some ability to analyze and judge whether their society's "way of life" is worth fighting for and risking death, crippling, insanity for?? But no, the "mature adults" refuse to fight in wars, in fact their societies usually prohibit them from fighting in wars, and the mature adults instead insist that all of the children in their society, fight in wars on their behalf. Immature children who have not enjoyed any of life's benefits and advantages. They haven't even been free to whatever degree of freedom society pretends to offer adults, since every child, until age 21, is officially decreed to be a subhuman slave, owned by his parents. The child is immature, not even a 26 year old has reached any type of genuine emotional or intellectual maturity. Not even at age 26, can a child rationally analyze and judge their society, from a mature perspective. And yet most combat soldiers in wars are aged 19, 20, 21, 22... By age 26, they are considered "veterans" of the military, despite still being children. In america, i believe, the maximum age that a citizen-slave can join a combat unit preparing to go to war, is 32. Just as the person begins to reach genuinely mature adulthood, society decrees that they are too old to become a wartime mass murderer, and instead a 19 year old child, immature, uninsightful, dumb, brainwashed, gullible, taught for his whole lifetime to mindlessly obey and believe whatever adult members of his society tell him, is terroristically compelled to risk his life, limbs, and sanity in mass murdering complete strangers who have been labeled as "foreign demons" for him, by his evil society. Absolutely incredible, the hypocrisy and the complete denial of Truth by you creatures! The Truth is, you despise your children. They exist to serve you. You are delighted, on a subconscious level, to send them off to commit murder on your behalf. You have your little bit of money, your house, your "family", people that you can oppress and victimize. You're not about to risk your life and your limbs just to satiate your homicidal rage. You are filled with suppressed rage, but just as you are unwilling to commit illegal murder, due to fear of the possibly negative personal consequences, you are unwilling to commit legal murder directly, via the war ritual, for the same reason, you fear losing your own life, limbs, or health. But you are eager to let your children take the risk. Eager! Because this is their purpose in existing, to serve you as slaves, to act as your personal Poison Containers, to "reward" you for the gift of your having created them, even if it means that they risk and sacrifice their lives, limbs, and sanity. On an even deeper level, at least some of you "mature adults" have developed enough rationality to realize that it is not worth risking your life and limb, to try and murder complete strangers upon the command of your governmental/societal leaders. You realize that despite being a victimized citizen-slave, whatever tiny bits of comfort and pleasure you have managed to find in life, give your life some value, and make you want to preserve and protect your life, to some degree. Your children cannot arrive at this realization. They are too immature, the rage they feel is too fresh and raw, as children, they have been complete slaves for their entire lives, thus unable to find even a few, half-hearted reasons to value their lives and health. They cannot stand up for their "right" to not risk their lives by facing off against homicidally enraged fellow children, the demonized societal war partner "enemy", because society has taught them that as children, they have no rights. You creatures, you "mature adults", have the ability to save and protect them. You have the ability to refuse to let your society fight wars. Remember, societies only fight wars on your behalfs and with your overt consent and agreement, as adult citizens. This is true for all societies, regardless of whether they label themselves as democracies, dictatorships, etc... And you also have the ability to demand that your societies only allow mature adults to fight in wars. But no, you diseased and overtly malevolent creatures cannot even begin to imagine making either one of these morally superior choices. Instead, you gleefully wallow in an orgy of bloodlust and bloodletting, happily sacrificing the lives, limbs, and sanity of your own children, and even more happily rejoicing in the genocidal murders of mostly other children, demonized foreign "enemy" children, that you command your own children to commit and carry out on your behalf. How incredibly perverse!

All wars are mutually provocative. Demonization and hate propaganda are used by warmongering societies, to create an aura of legitimization to a ritual that is profoundly and inherently insane and unjustifiable as practiced, the war ritual. The rage and hatred that members of one society feel towards members of another society, within the war ritual, is always misdirected and misguided. The actual source of the rage and hatred is the abuse and victimization that members of each society have been subjected to, at the hands of their own society, the society they were born into and raised up within, not at the hands of any foreign society. Wars are used by diseased and evil societies, in exactly the same manner as abortion, the death penalty, hunting, spanking, legal child abuse, euthanasia, and other genocidally harmful but legal rituals are used, to provide an outlet for the immense, suppressed, subconscious rage of the general public, without allowing/causing the general public to specifically recognize and target their own society and it's leaders/agents, as being the more proper and cathartically reflective outlet for their violent rage. Dehumanization and demonization are the primary societal tools in legitimizing the war ritual, and these two perverse methods are employed in many other malicious ways, by diseased societies. The dehumanization of children as public policy, the dehumanization of minority ethnic groups, such as blacks in america, are two examples of how societies take huge groups of people, and officially authorize a national policy under which these large groups of victims can be brutally tortured and oppressed under a cloak of moral legitimacy and justification, for the purpose of providing an outlet for the collective homicidal rage of the majority of citizen-slaves.

Enlighten your mind to all of the Forbidden Truths of human existence at The Manifesto of Forbidden Truth web site, http://forbiddentruth.8k.com