Multimedia
Audio
Video
Photo

Spoils of War Today? - Gulf War Syndrome

Anonyme, Sunday, May 28, 2006 - 14:04

D. Burbeck

For our troops on Memorial Day -

The Kings of Britain and France and
many other empires were able to raise
huge armies every several decades
because the soldiers who survived
the battles were rewarded with the
riches that they could carry and
women that they could rape at will.

Today's soldiers who join the military, in hopes of
getting a college education, are being rewarded
with quite the opposite of those in the past. Today's
soldiers - if they survive the front lines - are finding
a huge list of disabling and deadly medical maladies,
some of which, with a very high percentage, will be in
their future along with deformed offspring.

"Out of 580,400 soldiers who served in Gulf War I,
11,000 are dead, and by 2000 there were 325,000
on permanent medical disability. This astounding
number of disabled vets means that a decade later,
56 percent of those soldiers who served now have
medical problems. The number of disabled vets
reported up to 2000 has been increasing by 43,000
every year." Brad Flohr of the Department of Veterans
Affairs told American Free Press that he believes
there are more disabled vets now than even after
World War II. (1)

The Pentagon and the Veteran's Administration always
deny that Gulf War Syndrome is due to the illegal use of
uranium weapons; but, it is becoming more evident and
irrefutable.

It's not that the boys at the Pentagon don't believe that
uranium weapons cause this type of harm. They are very
aware that the use of uranium weapons is a death
sentence for our troops and is making parts of the world
uninhabitable for-ever. Here is a quote from Henry
Kissinger: “Military men are just dumb stupid animals to
be used as pawns in foreign policy.



CMAQ: Vie associative


Quebec City collective: no longer exist.

Get involved !

 

Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une Politique éditoriale , qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.

This is an alternative media using open publishing. The CMAQ collective, who validates the posts submitted on the Indymedia-Quebec, does not endorse in any way the opinions and statements and does not judge if the information is correct or true. The quality of the information is evaluated by the comments from Internet surfers, like yourself. We nonetheless have an Editorial Policy , which essentially requires that posts be related to questions of emancipation and does not come from a commercial media.