First paragraph (Teaser):

After researching this for myself, I was happy to find that I was not the only one who noticed.

Rest of the text:

To whom it may concern,

After watching the segment you carried from ABC News last night, in regards to the recent Londing Bombing, and noticing that this man was attributed only as "Security Analyst", I did some digging, since my favourite Journalism prof. back in college taught us that whenever a person's background and connections are not mentioned, something's being hidden.

What I found suprised me, and it appears that I'm not the only one, as I stumbled across this article on UK Independent Media today (below).

I think that it would only be fair, and the responsible thing, if you were to take a few moments to explain to your viewers that what they were watching last night was a dishonest, biased report. It did not originate with CTV, so that lets you off a bit, but you did choose to air it, so I think Canadians deserve a note of apology.

That same professor, an alum of publications such as the NY Times during the 60/70's warned us that "when the media speaks with one voice, start digging", and on the issue of the recent attacks, I'm afraid you're doing just what the media did to self-destruct when it, as a whole, repeated the LIES of Bush and Blair, which led to an illegal war against Iraq.

7/7 seems like a False Flag, carried out in order to strike fear in people, just as words like "Investigation, Impeachment, and Prosecution" are gaining both popularity and volume (Before you say it, Blair's story is also an unproven Conspiracy Theory), and last week's incidents seem designed to provide investigators with "evidence" which will guide them towards an intended enemy, presumably one of the PNAC target destinations.

I'm not expecting you to voice as much, but to ignore the missing, key and independently-verifiable evidence is to choose a side, and not one that the Canadian People tend to support.

Perhaps you could interview analysts at CSIS, for I'm sure that they've run this scenario in their own minds, given what has and hasn't been disclosed, not to mention the people we're dealing with (Bush, Blair, PNAC), their history, and what they're capable of and why.

This report is discredited in the face of the missing key evidence which would exist if Blair's Theory was true. Commentary about a suspect "Orgy of Evidence" should have never made it to air, especially a rehashed report from an American network.

I hope you will be more diligent in the future, especially during crises such as these. People are beginning to notice, and if you think this won't affect the future of TV News, you're sadly mistaken.

All the best,

Jordan Thornton

London: "News" As Pure PsyOps
------------------------------------------------------------------------

London bombers had nail bombs for 'second strike'

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last night ABC News in America screened unauthorised images of the damage left by the London bombs on July 7, and of unexploded devices found in a car parked at Luton railway station.

This is a transcript of the interview between ABC presenters Elizabeth Vargas and Pierre Thomas, and Robert Ayers, a security analyst who was shown the pictures
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1710681,00.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is Bob Ayers???????
------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote from above

"Bob Ayers is a security consultant with expertise in explosives, based here in London. "

------------------------------------------------------------------------
An expert in explosives?....er try... INFORMATION WARFARE
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bob Ayers is director of ParaProtect, an IT security company, and the former chief information-warfare officer at the US defence department. - source 1
http://support.casals.com/aaaflash1/busca.asp?ID_AAAControl=4688

http://www.paraprotect.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert Lee Ayers is a Director for Critical National Infrastructure Defence for Northrop Grumman Mission Systems Europe

A former US DoD official, Bob now is a UK citizen

so we have an article by the Times transcribing an ABC News show, which in effect PURE PSYOPS

WE HAVE TALK OF EXPLOSIVES BY AN EXPERT IN INFOWARFARE

FOR NORTHRUP GRUNMANN & THE PENTAGON

ASK YOURSELF THIS:

WHERE DID THE LUTON 7-7 2005 CCTV REALLY COME FROM???

WHERE ARE THE CCTV IMAGES FROM THE TRAINS???

WHERE DID THE CCTV OF THE LATEST BOMBINGS 21-7-2005 REALLY COME FROM?

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE???

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/07/319767.html

No Video of the 3 Bombers Inside the London Subway Cars

Posted by Dick Fojut on Wednesday, July 27th at 3:35 PM

No Video of the 3 Bombers Inside the London Subway Cars before they blew up?
by Dick Fojut

At present, the London underground has an analogue video network and video transmission at 180 stations. Confirmed by new reports, there are close to two thousand video cameras which monitor London's Underground and mainline rail stations.

It is estimated that "the average Briton is caught on various cameras up to 300 times on a normal day." (The Age, 8 July 2005).

The key issue raised in this commentary refers to videocameras inside the underground carriages. In most European metro systems, the trains are equipped with a videowatch installation, with video cameras inside each carriage. The driver of the train is able to see inside each of the carriages, and the digital video files would be available to police investigators.

EVERY London bus and Underground train car has multiple Video Cameras!

The Police claim the bus videos malfunctioned, but made no similar claim about the video cameras in the Underground train cars. The Muslim men are claimed to have ridden from Luton to King's Cross where they split up to take separate trains. I've also read it takes about 25 minutes to ride from Luton station to where the bombs were detonated.

Therefore, there MUST be some 25 minutes continuous video of first four men, riding from Luton, then video of each (supposed) "Muslim" Bomber, seated with his rucksack on each of the 3 separate Underground cars, riding from King's Cross - to where the 3 bombs exploded SIMULTANEOUSLY!

If the London Police CANNOT produce those videos they SHOULD possess, the accused 4 men, 3 supposedly with rucksack bombs, were NOT on the Underground train cars, did NOT detonate bombs! And the Police are LYING.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=FOJ20050...

Blair et al LIE about Iraq, but suddenly they're above telling a fib?