|
Canada Privatization Plan?Anonyme, Thursday, March 10, 2005 - 23:07 (Analyses | Alternatives constructives | Democratie | Ecologie | Economy | Globalisation | Guerre / War | Media | Politiques & classes sociales | Syndicats/Unions - Travail/Labor)
Dylan Penner, ACTivist Magazine
Business leaders in Canada call for the Canada Pension Plan to push forward P3's; CPP already investing in war. A January 31, 2005 National Post/COMPAS poll found that "business leaders" in Canada strongly agree that the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) "has an obligation to tell Canadians how government could make it easier for their pension savings to be invested profitably within the country, for example by creating more P3’s." While the implications of this poll for the CPP are unclear, the intentions certainly are. The National Post Poll used what was an "essentially hand-picked panel" as the report itself notes on page 8. What this poll demonstrates is the increasing pressure on the CPP from the business community to ensure the taxes of Canadians go to profit over people and the nature. The Canada Pension Plan is investing in 15 of the world's top 20 arms manufacturers. The CPP is subsidizing biopiracy The CPP is also funding Lockheed-Martin (no relation to Paul Martin... we think). Lockheed-Martin is the Pentagon's top military contractor and is involved in such projects as Star Wars Missile "Defence" and the 2006 Canadian Census. Halliburton is also on the list of CPP investments. Yet all of this is apparently not enough for the National Post's "hand-picked panel". According to the National Post poll, "Panelists, in fact, strongly support the Government enabling more domestic investment opportunities like P3’s... 71% of respondents say the decision of the CPP investment Board to invest abroad means the federal Government should “make possible more opportunities for CPP investments by increasing the number of P3s. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une
Politique éditoriale
, qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.
|