Multimedia
Audio
Video
Photo

Open Letter to Judge Pitt, J.

Anonyme, Thursday, March 10, 2005 - 13:08

Wolfe

Judgement against The Washington Post will be a problem for Indymedia.

03/10/05
To: Judge Pitt J. (SCJ Toronto, Ontario, Canada)
Re: Case Number C41379 ;
TUESDAY MARCH 8th, 2005
Bangoura, Cheickh v. The Washington Post et al

I would like to draw your attention to an article published on line in September 2002 by Joan E. Thomas§.

As a researcher who uses both on line archives and microfilms I find it hard to accept that your judgment in this case found that online content dated from 1997 is not legally the same as content found on microfilm.

I admit that there are some fundamental differences, but in this case the differences are mote. As technology has increased in efficiency news media has shifted it's archiving infrastructure to electronic format. In the days where microfilm was prominent this case would not be heard because it is a given that only professional researchers and reporters would bother to search the contents of those archives, therefore Mr. Bangor's claim could not be heard because the material in question was not considered examinable by the general public.

However, times have changed, and the process for research has itself moved into the arena of the common man. Even the profession of journalism is now crossing over to open publishing such as the case with Indymedia¶ of which I am proud to be part of.

I believe that the defendants are not liable for archived works that have already been updated. Mr. Bangor was found not guilty, this fact was also reported by The Washington Post as was the information concerning his charges when he worked with the United Nations in Africa. Any person seeking information about a public figure, and coming to conclusions about that person from archived works, is equally responsible to insure that the information is current.

I find that your judgment in this matter to be a threat to free speech, and lacking in understanding of current events.

Niel “Wolfe



CMAQ: Vie associative


Quebec City collective: no longer exist.

Get involved !

 

Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une Politique éditoriale , qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.

This is an alternative media using open publishing. The CMAQ collective, who validates the posts submitted on the Indymedia-Quebec, does not endorse in any way the opinions and statements and does not judge if the information is correct or true. The quality of the information is evaluated by the comments from Internet surfers, like yourself. We nonetheless have an Editorial Policy , which essentially requires that posts be related to questions of emancipation and does not come from a commercial media.