Multimedia
Audio
Video
Photo

2005 Inauguration of George W. Bush

michael hull, Sunday, January 23, 2005 - 16:00

Michael Hull

After watching the inauguration of George W. Bush this past Thursday I couldn't help, but realize the theatrical spectacle of it all. Everything was planned and everything went according to plan.


The symbolic idea of the inauguration was to re-emphasize the power of the president. We saw George Bush address hundreds of thousands of people at Capitol Hill, but more importantly the millions of people who were watching on television. The whole spectacle of the inauguration was to give viewers at home visually symbolic representation of Bush’s power over the masses by showing him address hundreds of thousands of people in attendance. This visual style of spectacle is by no means a new technique used by those in political power. It has been present since the Roman Empire when Emperors would address the masses. The main difference today is the role of the media and television in particular. In the Roman era the hundreds of thousands physically present while in the 21rst Century we see hundreds of thousands of people addressed while millions watch on television. Watching the inauguration on TV was like watching the Emperor introduction in the film Gladiator. We see the visual parallels of hundreds of thousands of people in attendance, political cabinet representatives and buildings supported by Roman style columns directly in the foreground.


The speech Bush delivered is used to create the illusion of democracy. Bush abuses political rhetoric in order to sustain this illusion. The speech seems to be trying to convince Americans that his ideas are democratic as opposed to discuss what democratic ideals have achieved. For every word Bush emphasized we saw a camera shot of a political representative of that word. For example, when Bush referred to “firmness



CMAQ: Vie associative


Quebec City collective: no longer exist.

Get involved !

 

Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une Politique éditoriale , qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.

This is an alternative media using open publishing. The CMAQ collective, who validates the posts submitted on the Indymedia-Quebec, does not endorse in any way the opinions and statements and does not judge if the information is correct or true. The quality of the information is evaluated by the comments from Internet surfers, like yourself. We nonetheless have an Editorial Policy , which essentially requires that posts be related to questions of emancipation and does not come from a commercial media.