Multimedia
Audio
Video
Photo

Dredging or survival of the St. Lawrence River?

Anonyme, Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 11:20

Natacha Perriard

American Army ingeniors are in charge of this 20 billion US dollars project since 2002.
The environmental Ministries of Quebec, Ontario, Canada and the United States have not even been consulted…

I have just listened to an interview (cf. Reference at the end of the page) on the dredging of the St. Lawrence.
I am a citizen living by the banks of the river in Montreal (Verdun) since 1980.
I am appaled by this project, its tremendous impact (disappearance of the river), by the silence around the project and by the alternatives that exist but are simply not considered.
Growing up by the river, I have seen the river change over the years (pollution, dropping of fish populations, crayfish local extinction and general degeneration of life on the banks) but the river is still here and helps me keep my head up in times of hardships (personal and international).

I urge you to look into this project, break the silence and mobilize. For more info, contact Louis-Gilles Francoeur, he is a journalist at Le Devoir.

American Army ingeniors are in charge of this 20 billion US dollars project since 2002.
The environmental Ministries of Quebec, Ontario, Canada and the United States have not even been consulted…

The St. Lawrence Seaway was established in 1960.
The official version of this dredging project: optimize the locks.
The project, reviewed, deals in fact with the future needs of the panamax, these 300 meter-long (1000 feet) boats.

The dredging project proposes the enlargement of the locks but also a recalibration of the river.
The channel is now 200 meters large and 11 meters deep and enables boats to navigate without touching the bottom.
It would have to be enlarged even more.

Medium-term, climate change will already lower the river level.
The ecological impacts are more than important. Except for the channel, the river, now 3 meters deep would suffer a 2 meter drop (climate change and recalibration)…
The St. Lawrence River and its ecosystem would thus disapear, leaving a narrow commercial panamax water-highway…
The costs are tremendous, ecological, social but also economic. And viable alternatives exist, such as intermodal transport.

Reference :
If you understand french, I urge you to listen to Louis-Gilles Francoeur’s radio-report (aired March 17, on Radio-Canada,
on the Indicatif Present show and archived at this address : http://radio-canada.ca/radio/indicatifpresent/
(then click on ‘environnement’ and find the ‘Dragage du Saint-Laurent’ audio clip).

Natacha Perriard
Verdun, Qc.



CMAQ: Vie associative


Quebec City collective: no longer exist.

Get involved !

 

Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une Politique éditoriale , qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.

This is an alternative media using open publishing. The CMAQ collective, who validates the posts submitted on the Indymedia-Quebec, does not endorse in any way the opinions and statements and does not judge if the information is correct or true. The quality of the information is evaluated by the comments from Internet surfers, like yourself. We nonetheless have an Editorial Policy , which essentially requires that posts be related to questions of emancipation and does not come from a commercial media.