First paragraph (Teaser):

A Forbidden Truth dissection of the genocidally evil, perverse, and lie-based ideological and operational structures of all political and governmental systems of the human species.

Rest of the text:

The Forbidden Truths of all human Political Systems:

What is politics? The primary dictionary definition of this word is: The science and art of governing a country. Is this a valid definition? No. Here is the True definition: Politics is a deceitful set of ideological notions, specifically created, designed, and marketed by governments to their citizens, for the purpose of creating an illusion of freedom, autonomy, and personal choice for citizens, in terms of the structure and path of their individual lives. If you wish to apply terms such as "science" or "art" to the definition of politics, such terms must be accompanied with other language that clearly reveals the fact that this governmental activity is utterly deceitful, and it's ideological props, such as "elections", are nothing more than invalid illusions.

According to popular notion, there are several different "types" of governments. There are democracies, totalitarian governments, communist governments, etc.. Each form of government claims to provide the best living environment for it's citizen-slaves. This notion of there being several different types of governments in the world, is structured along the same lines, and for the same malevolent purposes, as the insane god myth notion that there are numerous "different" mainstream religions. Each religion claims to offer the "best" version of god worship, the real and desirable god, while dismissing and outright condemning the other religions. Every form of government does the exact same thing, terroristically brainwashing it's citizen-slaves into accepting the notion that "their" form of government is more benevolent and superior to, other forms of government. Understand that the exact same malevolent principle is applied, for the exact same reasons, in both the insane god myth and the myth of differing governmental ideologies. Numerous mainstream religions have been created, for the specific purpose of allowing you pathetic creatures to feel superior to other humans via the notion that you are worshipping the "right" god, while the other people, those of a different religion, are worshipping the "wrong" god. In exactly the same fashion, numerous systems of government have been created for the specific purpose of causing you pathetic creatures to feel and believe that you live in a country and under a government that provides you with a superior quality of life, in comparison to people living in other countries, under governmental doctrine that are said to be different than your government's doctrine, and always decreed to be inferior to the form of government that you live under. Every religion instructs it's devotees that they are lucky to be devoted to this particular version of the insane god myth, because it is the best version, the only true version, the version that will result in the greatest degree of reward. Inherent within this perverse brainwashing is a demonization of all other religions, religions that are different from "your" religion. Every political system does exactly the same thing, it operates along the exact same principle, instructing it's citizens that they are lucky to live within and embrace the legitimacy of, the current, existing form of government that is in place, brainwashing every citizen and in fact every child born into the society from the first day of his birth, that their government and political system is the best in the world, the only true and legitimately proper form of government, and the form of government that will result in you, the individual citizen-slave, enjoying the greatest degree of reward, via safety, equality, freedom, justice, and benevolent treatment in general. Inherent within this brainwashing is a demonization of all other forms of government, designed to both enslave the mind/intellect of the individual to believing that he must support his government at all costs, and within this mindset, to accept the notion that even if he feels himself to be suffering greatly and unjustly as a direct result of his government, he must still remain a loyal, law-abiding citizen-slave, based upon the lie that every other form of government would inflict far more suffering and harm upon him, than his current government is inflicting. What we have here, as in virtually all aspects of human life, is a perverse shell game designed to cause you creatures to agree to accept suffering and injustice, and to remain devoted to a system of brutally oppressive malevolence, via brainwashing, lies, ridiculous claims of moral and ideological superiority by supreme leaders, and invalid, terroristic, demonizing threats that "your" government is not only a superior and good government, but that all other forms of government are totally inferior and evil, for the purpose of intellectually and emotionally terrorizing you into remaining loyal and devoted to the government, to the societal leaders, under whose fascist control you currently live as citizen-slaves.

I am now going two reveal two extremely important Forbidden Truths on this topic, so please read and analyze this paragraph very carefully. I will be discussing these Truths at great length below, but first let me reveal them both, in a detailed and comprehensive manner. #1: All forms of government that have achieved success within the Modern Era in terms of attaining and retaining power over a significant number of people, are identical in overall design, structure, and purpose. A communist government, a totalitarian government, is identical in design, structure, and purpose, to a "democratic" government. Since all governments are identical in this manner, the various labels, such as communist, democratic, totalitarian, etc..., that are used by governments to describe themselves as well as to label other governments, have no Truth-based legitimacy or accuracy. #2: Every governmental system is designed to achieve the exact same goal: To oppress, victimize, impose it's malicious will upon all individual citizens, to compel obedience and conformity to mainstream ideological doctrine that the supreme leaders of the government have chosen to decree as "sacred", and at all costs, to retain the loyalty and devotion of as many citizens as possible. Okay, now we can begin to flesh out these Truths in detail, beginning with #1. The christian god freak feels superior to the moslem god freak. He feels this way because the leaders of christianity have brainwashed him into believing that christianity is superior and that god will reward him for embracing the "right" religion, the true religion. The moslem god freak feels the same way, thanks to brainwashing by his religion's malevolent leaders. In each case, it is the leaders of the religion who benefit, they have power because pathetic, brainwashed, mentally ill sheeple are devoted to them, and obey them. In reality of course, every mainstream religion is exactly the same, operates along the exact same "omnipotent creature wants to be worshipped and obeyed, will reward you with a blissful afterlife" excreta. Government and politics operate on this exact same structure. You are told that there are several different forms of government in existence, you are told that one form of government is very good and highly superior to the other forms of government, and that you will reap great rewards in embracing the "right and good" form of government, and suffer great peril and pain if you betray or abandon this "right" government, or choose to embrace one of the "wrong and bad" forms of government. Guess what? It is always the government that already has you in it's toxic clutches, that you are already a citizen of, which claims to offer you the "right and good" form of government, while mercilessly demonizing the other forms of government, and trying to instill terror within you, of the demonized, "wrong and bad" forms of government.

If you are an american citizen, you are terroristically brainwashed into believing that "democracy" is the "right and good" form of government, and the other forms are demonized to you. If you are a citizen of Cuba, you are terroristically brainwashed into believing that communism is the "right and good" form of government, while democracy is demonized to you. If you live in Afghanistan, you are terroristically brainwashed into believing that a totalitarian regime based upon islamic interpretation of religion, is the right and good form of government, while all other forms are demonized to you. As a seeker of Truth, it is extremely important that you find the sanity within yourselves to recognize that not only does each government, america, cuba, afghanistan, commit an atrocity upon it's citizens that is absolutely equal in scope and measure, via it's own terroristic brainwashing, but even more importantly, there is in reality no legitimately valid distinction that can be made between these three "different" forms of government. Yes, there are some extremely noticeable "cosmetic" and cultural differences in terms of how citizen-slaves in these 3 societies live out their day to day lives, their rituals, hobbies, daily activities, as their governments have terroristically dictated. But there is still no genuine difference in the design, operational structure, and purpose of the three forms of government. Consider: Each of these three forms of government uses lies to win over the support and loyalty of it's citizen. Each government demonizes other forms of government. Each government has the overt goal of forcing it's citizen-slaves to embrace all of the primary ideological doctrine that the supreme leaders have decided to be highly important. Each government has and undertakes an overt agenda of oppressing and victimizing it's citizen-slaves, while at the same time using a terroristic threat to get away with their oppression and victimization, the very specific threat that if the person lived in one of the other two countries, they would suffer far greater oppression and victimization under that country's "wrong and bad" form of government. Each government is specifically designed and structured, in an identical manner, to victimize it's own citizens and to get away with/justify this victimization to it's citizens, by terroristically brainwashing them into believing that their particular form of government is the best form, while the other forms of government are "evil and terrible".

So, all forms of government that have managed to achieve and retain any type of a significant degree of power over other human beings in the modern era, are the same. "Democracy", communism, totalitarianism, religious fundamentalism, these are nothing more than demonizing labels that governments create and use for the purpose of claiming moral superiority and benevolence, as well as for the even more useful purpose of demonizing other governments so that their own citizen-victims perversely rationalize the brutality they are being subjected to, by believing that the other governments would inflict even greater brutality upon them. The christian feels superior to the moslem, and the moslem feels superior to the christian, only because these two invalid labels exist. If there was only one version of the exact same insane god myth, it wouldn't work, because you pathetic creatures are desperate to feel superior to fellow humans, especially in situations where you are being victimized, oppressed, forced to act in unnatural ways and to accept/endure harm/injustice. You must find a way to rationalize your suffering and victimization. The only ways to do this are to either refuse to accept the fact that you are being subjected to brutal victimization and unnecessary suffering, or to accept the notion that your suffering is somehow "necessary", and that other governments make their citizens suffer much more than your government makes you and your fellow citizens suffer. There have to be numerous different "mainstream" versions of the insane god myth, in order for the god myth itself to be so universally embraced and accepted as it is. In exactly the same manner, there have to be different labels for government, in order for individuals to universally accept the victimization and fascism that their government imposes upon them. If every government labeled itself as "democratic", and every government declared that all other governments were democratic, citizens would come to realize that they are being brutally oppressed and victimized, simply because the governments could not put out their demonizing propaganda lies that their form of government is "right and good", while the other forms of government are "evil and terrible", because all governments would carry the same label. The Truth would be revealed under such a scenario, the Forbidden Truth that all governments are the same, all governments operate under the exact same malicious and malevolent structure, design, and operational precepts. Societal and governmental leaders, with malice aforethought, deliberately create and popularize the notion that there are "different" religious and political ideologies, for the specific purpose of causing their own citizen-slaves/devotees to feel and believe themselves to be superior to others, better off than other groups of humans, to justify demonizing others, and to terrorize their own devotees with the threat that they had better remain loyal to their current oppressors, because if not, they will face the far more terrible wrath of a far more terrible religious or political ideology. But the Truth is that all religious and political ideologies are identical in every meaningful way, identically malicious and malevolent. Governments get away with brutally oppressing and victimizing their citizens only because they are able to hold out the terroristic threat, completely untrue and invalid of course, that other governments, real, existing governments, are evil and terrible and would inflict far greater, far more horrific oppression and victimization upon the person, if he were to fall into their clutches, as a citizen-slave. Seekers of Truth, let us now cast aside all of these invalid, demonizing labels, and embrace the fact that there is no legitimacy to such labels.

Now, I'm sure some of you are thinking to yourselves, "Isn't it a fact that some types of governments offer "more freedom" to their citizens, than other types of governments, and doesn't this mean that there is a fundamental difference between forms of government such as democratic versus totalitarianism"? The answer to this question is: No. To an extreme degree, "freedom" is nothing more than a state of mind. None of us are genuinely free, and the manner in which we perceive our day to day lives, is how we uniquely judge for ourselves whether we are free, or able to "enjoy our freedom". Freedom is an intellectual thought/concept, that is translated into an emotional feeling, and can be used by individuals to define a specific activity, but at it's core, it remains an intellectual concept. For example, people like to say that a prison inmate has had his "freedom taken away from him." This is not true. Freedom is an intellectual concept, it resides within the unique mind of every individual human being. If an individual feels free, an individual is free. Taking away a person's ability to do certain things, only affects the person's freedom if the person intellectually and emotionally believes and accepts the notion that his freedom is linked to his ability to do those specific things. Yes, the vast majority of prison inmates do feel as though they have had their freedom taken away from them, but this is only because they mentally, intellectually, and emotionally associate the concept of freedom, with being able to do certain specific things that they used to be able to do prior to being imprisoned. The Superior human recognizes that the only real freedom that an individual needs, the only freedom that is universally valid and therefore deserves to be called freedom, resides within the unique mind and brain of every individual. The unique manner in which you define freedom to yourself, is the only accurate way to measure whether you yourself are free, or can enjoy freedom. Superior prison inmates, even those in maximum security cells, can and do feel far freer than many multimillionaires, who are hopelessly chained to their jobs, enslaved to their families, and hopelessly trapped within other perceived "obligations" and toxic societal rituals. This "feeling" of freedom is in fact the absolute experience of freedom, since this concept is an intellectual/emotional one. In other words, being physically "free" to go wherever one wants, in no way constitutes freedom, unless the individual perceives himself to be free and to enjoy freedom, within his own unique mind. I will be discussing the topic of Freedom at great length in a separate essay later within this Manifesto, but on this particular point, governmental claims of "freedom", let it be clearly understood that no government offers any significantly greater genuine level of freedom to it's citizen-slaves, than any other government. Some governments, specifically those which label themselves as "democracies", devote more time and effort towards offering an illusion of freedom, and their most fervent form of terroristic demonization of other governments is their claim to "be free", and their threat that the other governments are not free and do not offer freedom. This is nothing more than a demonizing lie, designed and promulgated for the purpose of winning over and retaining the support of as many citizen-slaves as possible, for the existing governmental regime.

The design structure and the overt goal of every government is the same: To rob all individual citizens of their freedom. To restrict, manipulate, guide, control the lifestyle choices and options of all citizens. To coerce and force citizens to behave in certain ways, to believe in certain things, to embrace very specific ideological notions, all of which serve to rob people of their freedom, personal autonomy, and free will. Every aspect of every government is specifically designed not to encourage freedom, not to even allow freedom, but to take away freedom, including the most important freedom of all: Intellectual freedom and the ability to live life based upon Truth. Take religion. The vast majority of governments, most especially so-called "democracies", terroristically impose the toxic myth of god existing, upon the helpless minds of all children born into the society, as well as adults. Simply in choosing to do this, the society robs it's citizens of the ability to enjoy intellectual freedom and the ability to make life choices based upon the simple, True fact that there is no invisible, omnipotent god creature with a fascist agenda of behavioral demands, to fear and to be terroristically obliged to cater to.

Perversely, you creatures who live under terroristic regimes which label themselves as "free democracies", are instructed to celebrate and rejoice in the fact that you enjoy "religious freedom". Your evil society tells you that you are so very lucky to be religiously free, allowed to worship whatever version of the insane god myth you choose. The reality of course, is that you enjoy absolutely no freedom from religion. Insane religious doctrine has been forcibly shoved down your throats, each and every day of your lives, beginning when you were a tiny baby, by your society and government. But you are too broken and brainwashed to recognize the fact that what you are told and taught constitutes a "precious freedom", in reality constitutes an utterly vicious and literally genocidal form of intellectual fascism, that your society terroristically imposed upon you, and outrageously continues to impose upon every single man, woman, and child born into and/or living as a citizen of, a so-called "free democracy" like america. A society/government that at least refrains from viciously imposing the insane god myth upon it's citizens, that does not stridently promote the insane god myth, clearly is offering greater "freedom" to it's citizens, than a society that does stridently promote the god myth. But tragically, a lifetime of brainwashing renders 99.9999% of all humans who are citizens of "free democracy" governments, unable to recognize even this most glaringly obvious Forbidden Truth. Let us understand that defining "freedom" is essentially impossible, on a general level. And it is the societies and governments which most stridently claim to offer freedom, that most often practice and impose the most viciously fascist and genocidally harmful forms of oppression upon their citizen-slaves.

Such societies proudly claim to offer "political freedom", when in reality their political system is specifically designed so that it is impossible for anyone who does not tote the same ideological platform as the existing leaders tote, to attain power. This will be discussed at length below. Such governments claim to offer free market "economic freedom", when in reality their economic structure is specifically designed to force people to waste their lives working as slaves, designed to keep the vast majority of citizens trapped within a cycle of either grinding poverty, or trapped within a spin cycle that involves the malicious use of artificial constructs such as interest rates, inflation, and cost of living increases that are carefully adjusted on a constant basis by the government, for the purpose of allowing people to believe that they have reached the "middle class" of economic achievement, when in reality they are wasting their lives spending all of the money they make, within an insane system known as capitalism which is specifically designed to compel all citizen-slaves to spend the vast majority of all the money they earn. There is absolutely nothing inherently freer or better for the typical human being, within any of the governmental structures of a society that labels itself as a "free democracy", in comparison to a society that carries a label of dictatorship or totalitarian. The specific methods of mass oppression and fascism that are employed by different societies, absolutely does vary. The end result however, is not only the same, but on average, it is the societies which carry the "free democracy" label which cause the greatest degree of harm and victimization not only to their own citizen-slaves, but in fact to other societies and governments and to planet earth as a whole. Free democracies are the greatest warmongerers. Free democracies are the governments most desperate to "convert" other governments to their design structure. Free democracies start most wars, by interfering in the sovereign activities and ideologies of other nations. Free democracies cause the greatest harm to the natural resources of the planet. Governments which label themselves as free democracies in reality offer slightly less genuine, personally useful freedom to their citizen-slaves, than do societies that label themselves as "communist" or refrain from constantly, desperately claiming to offer "glorious freedom", which is the primary propaganda lie that ultra-diseased societies like america are constantly putting forth, to retain the support and loyalty of their brainwashed citizens.

The Truth is, the vast majority of all human beings have absolutely no desire to be free, to enjoy genuine freedom. What you want is to be told that you are free, to pretend that you are free, even as you happily allow your evil governments to dictate every single significant aspect of your lives. The "free democracy" governments pander to this perverse desire of yours, telling you that you are free, making you believe that you enjoy freedom, providing you with the illusion of freedom so that you can lie to yourself, delude yourself into feeling that you are free, and they do this for the specific purpose of gaining your patriotic loyalty and devotion. Freedom exists in the mind of the individual. Genuine freedom can only exist within the embrace of Truth. Since none of you creatures are even capable of recognizing Truth, not only are you totally unable to recognize genuine freedom, but if somehow given an opportunity to be genuinely free, you would flee in terror from the genuine freedom, and ferociously cling to your invalid, toxic illusions of freedom. Again, religion provides the perfect example of this. You ferociously cling to the insane illusion of freedom offered by "democratic" societies, which tells you that you enjoy the glorious freedom of choosing which religion to addict and enslave yourself and your children to. And yet if given the opportunity to live under a government that offered you genuine protection from the insane god myth, that did not viciously impose religion upon all citizens, that offered you the genuine freedom of not being subjected to fascist god myth addiction, you would reject and renounce such a government, insanely declaring it to be "unfree", lacking freedom, even though it actually offers you far more genuine freedom, freedom based upon Truth, the freedom to make this particular life decision, whether or not to believe in/worship god, without the brutal brainwashing and terroristic coercion, that the religion-imposing "democratic" government inflicts upon you. So understand this Truth, that in reality, the vast majority of all human beings have no interest in or desire for, genuine freedom. They want their government to impose it's fascist will upon them.

As you know, Truth is the very essence of this Manifesto. Everything good and valuable in life, on an individual level, must be rooted in Truth. All governments maliciously lie to their citizens, as a matter of core policy and design structure. The very structure of government itself, is such that it can only exist as a ruling force, if it is totally rooted in lies, deceit, brainwashing, and manipulation of reality via the artificial creation of invalid illusions which are masqueraded as constituting Truth. Based upon this Truth, as well as the Truths revealed throughout this essay, it is obvious that no government currently in existence, and in fact no government that has ever existed throughout the modern era, deserves to exist. There has never been a government that existed within a framework of morality, decency, benevolence, or Truth. Every government has been overtly, supremely, malevolent in design, ideology, and the specific doctrines that it has imposed upon it's citizens. This having been said, lets also realize that different forms of government do rely, at least on a surface level, on slightly different methodologies when it comes to retaining the devotion and loyalty of their citizens. Governments that label themselves as free democracies rely extremely heavily on brainwashing and lies, while governments that label themselves as communist/totalitarian rely more on overt physical threats of imprisonment, torture, death. "Religiously fundamentalist" governments are in the middle, relying very heavily on brainwashing and lies regarding the god myth, while also using overt threats of imprisonment, torture, death. In point of fact, america is a religiously fundamentalist form of government, although this would never be admitted to of course, by the evil leaders. The Truth is, afghanistan is a religiously fundamentalist government that employs one specific version of the insane god myth within it's core ideological structure, while america is a religiously fundamentalist government that employs numerous, slightly different versions of the insane god myth within it's core ideological structure. The end result is identical, both of these governments are literally soaked and saturated within toxic god mythology, and deserve to carry the same "form of government" label, I would use the label of "religious fundamentalism".

Nationalistic versus Humanistic orientation: I have begun this paragraph with red lettering, because this next point is extremely important. The design structure of all governments, which I have already revealed to be so perverse that no currently existing government has a moral entitlement to exist, is such that citizen-slaves are brainwashed and compelled to adopt a nationalistic, as opposed to a humanistic, outlook on life. What do I mean by this? Nationalism is defined as a "devotion to one's country, patriotic feelings or efforts". In reality of course, it is a devotion towards the government of the country. Nationalism is an invalid ideological construct, partly because no government currently in existence deserves to receive "fervent devotion" from human beings, but even more so because the very premise of nationalism is designed and destined to split the human race into feuding, warring, demonizing groups. Every government wants it's citizen-slaves to be nationalistic. This nationalistic orientation involves an irrational, illogical devotion to and loyalty for, the government. Once a government establishes a nationalistic mindset among it's citizens, the next step is to exploit this invalid ideology by demonizing foreign governments, nations, and ideologies, and to get citizen-slaves to direct all of the rage and hate they feel at the suffering and injustice that their own government is responsible for causing them to suffer, onto these demonized foreign entities, that in reality have had nothing to do with causing their personal suffering and enraged distress. This nationalistic brainwashing is primarily responsible for a great deal of the inter-governmental war, violence, feuding, and misdirection of rage, that humans engage in. It also serves all governments very well, in terms of allowing their malevolent and genocidally victimizing regimes to remain in power.

The antidote for toxic nationalistic orientation, is humanistic orientation. In Humanistic orientation, human beings would be able to recognize the Truth of how they are essentially identical in species nature, to all other human beings on the planet, and that all of the ideological differences that exist have in reality been artificially induced and created by governments. Governments get away with brutally victimizing their citizen-slaves, primarily because they create the illusion that other groups of people, living in other nations and under a declared "different" form of government, are completely different in nature, mysteriously different, extremely dangerous, and pose a threat to the citizens living under this government. This creates the illusion that the citizen has to embrace, obey, honor, and support "their" government, under the notion that their government is a good government that will protect them from the bad "demons" and the mysterious, bizarre foreign governments that wish to kill, destroy, torture, them. In Humanistic orientation, we recognize the Truth. We recognize that if in fact a citizen of afghanistan wants to kill complete strangers just because they are american, he does so only because he is a victim of the perverse brainwashing that his government/society has undertaken and committed against him. If an american is terrified of falling under the rule of the cuban government, he is only terrified because his government has invalidly demonized the cuban form of government for political and fascist control gain. We recognize and embrace the fact that all human beings, all across the world, are born with identical needs and traits, and that all of the political and ideological differences that arise within the perceptions of reality of individuals, are 100% the fault of the malevolent, brainwashing, lie-based, toxic governments and societies that human beings are enslaved by and raised up within.

Embracing this Truth would be a first step towards breaking free of toxic nationalistic orientation, in favor of personally empowering Humanistic orientation. What makes Humanistic orientation empowering is the fact that it allows the individual to at least begin to break free of the insane devotion to their own government, the government that is directly and primarily responsible for and guilty of their life victimizations. By recognizing that every human being is born identical, that every government is overtly malevolent, and that every government is completely responsible for creating all of the so-called "political and ideological differences" among individuals, Superior people, those capable of sane thought, would also begin to realize that it is completely irrational, illogical, and in essence a betrayal of self, as well as a betrayal of Truth, for the person to embrace nationalism, patriotism, loyalty to government, or any type of demonization of foreign nations or governments. In a nutshell: Every government brutally victimizes it's own citizens, far more than it victimizes the citizens of any other nation, and therefore to embrace nationalism constitutes a betrayal of self, you are pledging your loyalty and devotion to the one government/society on the planet that has victimized you far more than any other government/society has victimized you, or wants to victimize you. The "enemy", those foreigners that you are instructed to demonize and hate, are identical to you. They are victims just like you are a victim. Their government/society has committed literally the exact same type of brutal atrocities upon them, that your government has committed upon you. And as far as the "different" forms of government that your government instructs you to be terrible, evil, lacking freedom, etc..., you recognize the fact that you are being manipulated. Your "fear of the unknown" is being mercilessly exploited. You recognize that all forms of government are in reality the same, that all forms are malevolent, and that all governments victimize their own citizens far more than anyone else. Once you embrace all of these Truths, you can begin to decide what to do, how to live, whether to allow your government to exist, to rule over you and dictate your life path, whether to be loyal to your government, etc..., from a Truth-based perspective.

As you might imagine, the notion of you creatures even considering adopting a Humanistic orientation towards life, fills the supreme leaders and other empowered agents of all governments with immense dread. It would signal the beginning of the end for all currently existing governments and governmental design structures. But guess what? Your supreme leaders are not concerned with this notion, at all. If they thought there was a possibility that even one person in 5000 might embrace humanism over nationalism, they would be in terror. But they know better. They know just how pathetically inferior you creatures are. They know that you are nothing more than blind sheeple. They know that the only way you can cope with your own pathetic lives, is to embrace only lie-based ideology, to demonize fellow humans, other religions, other governments. You cling to the insane nationalism that your governments feed you, like a drowning man in the middle of the ocean who cannot swim, clings to a life preserver. To embrace Humanistic Truth would require you to face up to the overt malice of literally all of the fundamental structures, government, religion, delusions of freedom, that you base your entire lives upon. No chance of this ever occurring, and believe me, your evil societal and governmental leaders know this to be the case. They sleep well, no worries that their completely artificial, lie-based regimes will be exposed for what they are.

It's fascinating to look at the issue of how and why some governments, like america, are obsessed with luring people who live under other governments, to reject their current government, embrace the american government, and emigrate to america. Truly this is an ideological obsession, for the american government. Most governments do not actively and constantly solicit immigrants. Many governments absolutely refuse to allow immigrants into their country. But america obsessively solicits immigrants, and uses their arrival to ridiculously proclaim itself to be wonderfully free, overtly benevolent, and "better" than all other governments/societies, as proven by the fact that people from other societies and living under other governments "want" to come live in america. The Truth is, the american government maliciously lures and entices people living in other countries, using false claims, false promises, and invalid, brainwashing ideology, into believing that they will enjoy a "better quality of life" in america. Once in america, these immigrants are forced to assume the worst possible jobs, usually treated as being even more subhuman than blacks born in america, and continue to be brainwashed with the ridiculous notion that they must be very grateful to have been "accepted" into the country of america, because they now enjoy wonderful "freedom", that they did not enjoy under their former government. This is utterly ridiculous! What types of "freedom" do they enjoy? The freedom to addict themselves to the insane god myth of their choice? The freedom to work 10 hours a day, 6 days per week, for the rest of their lives, just so they can afford to feed and cloth themselves and their children with the incredibly overpriced fashions that american society dictates, as well as buy items, like VCR's and pools and fancy furnishings that they do not need and never would have thought of buying if they had remained in their former country? The freedom to sacrifice their own lives under the bizarre notion that it is their duty to help their americanized children to enjoy a better quality of life after they themselves die? The freedom to vote in elections, to pretend to be "choosing" their governmental leaders when in reality there is no such thing as a free election or any genuine political choice, under the democratic system? This is not freedom, this is slavery, a form of slavery that more often than not serves to greatly decrease the actual quality of life that the immigrant experiences, in comparison to the quality of life he would have enjoyed had he remained in his native country. Of course very few immigrants can consciously recognize the fact that their quality of life has in reality decreased, thanks to the constant brainwashing mantra of american society, that it is the "best", that it offers glorious, unmatched, invaluable "freedom", etc...

Let us understand that governments which obsessively solicit immigrants are inferior to governments that bar immigrants or greatly restrict immigration. The slave underclass within a government like america, is absolutely brutal in scope and breath. Throughout american history, there has been a desperate effort to constantly bring in new supplies of human slaves, by the mainstream, middle-class population. The kidnapping of african blacks worked for awhile, until insane moral justification eroded, and in the wake of this erosion, coerced immigration via brainwashing and lies, has been and continues to be employed by the american government. If the american government can convince people to "voluntarily" emigrate to america, the slave/kidnapping angle is diluted, and moral justification can be maintained, in a way that the kidnapping of blacks from africa, could not maintain moral justification for more than two hundred or so years. You creatures embrace the notion that the immigrants "want" to come to america of their own free will, they must be grateful that america accepts them in, allows them to come in, and so they "naturally" must accept subhuman status and devote their lives to endless labor, engaging in employment that the typical, mainstream, middle-class american, and even slum-dwelling native americans/descendants of kidnapped africans, refuse to engage in. The Truth is that just because a person is tricked, brainwashed, coerced into believing that the american government is better than his current government, and "chooses" to emigrate to america as a result of this deceit, a deceit that is deliberately and specifically undertaken by the american government, in no way means that the person came to america of his own free will, or that the subhuman, essentially slave status that these people are condemned to, can be in any way morally, ethically, or benevolently justified. "Established" americans, those who have been citizen-slaves of america for their entire lives, currently morally justify this to themselves, in exactly the same invalid, perversely hypocritical manner that they used to justify the kidnapping and "official" slave status of african blacks. "We are not forcing them to come here, they come of their own free will, seeking the glorious freedom that only we, the superior society of america, can and does offer", this is the excreta that americans embrace, even though it is nothing but an utter lie and sham. You are forcing them to come to america, by luring and enticing them with utter propaganda and lies. And you have no glorious freedom to offer, only perverse, sham illusions of freedom, illusions that you shove down the throats and minds of foreigners specifically because you are on a constant, desperate mission to acquire new, dirt poor slaves, as well as desperately trying to maintain to yourselves the illusion and personal delusion that your society is wonderful, superior, freedom-based, a heavenly nirvana compared to the horrors committed by all those demonized, "bad and wrong" governments that you are constantly initiating and provoking wars against, to satiate your collective homicidal rage at the undeniable distress, victimization, brutalization, that you are in reality experiencing, at the direct hands of your very own society/government.

Time to say a few words about Defection. What is defection? Within the context of this topic, it is defined as: To desert one's country, to abandon allegiance to a government. Every government has it's defectors, and every government deliberately tries to cover up, conceal, hide, and not allow their media to report upon, defections undertaken by their citizen-slaves. Every defector represents Truth. Every defector represents a case of an individual, subjected to pro-governmental brainwashing and propaganda, who has somehow found the personal independence and insight to break free from and reject the legitimacy of, their government's patriotic coercion efforts. Even though governmental leaders know, intellectually, that the vast majority of their broken citizen-slaves are almost certain to remain blindly loyal, there is still genuine concern within the leadership that even a single defector, if he is vocal enough and his True story is revealed, could help at least a few of his formerly fellow citizens to find the sanity, insight, and intelligence to realize that they in reality owe absolutely no allegiance to their government/society, as well. At the same time, governments do realize that if someone defects to them, this provides a great, extremely useful propaganda coup. The government can and of course does, proudly proclaim: "Look at this, this human being chose to defect to our nation, he chose to abandon his former government and to embrace our government, at peril to himself. This proves that our society, our government, and our form of government, is truly, undeniably superior to all other governments and worthy of unquestioned support and patriotic loyalty from all citizens." Of course nothing could be further from the Truth, but Truth does not matter, all that matters is that the defection by a tortured victim creation of one government, to a different government, can be gloriously exploited by whatever government the victim has chosen to defect to. Because of this, a brutally fascist and completely hypocritical standard of information dissemination as well as news reporting, occurs with regard to the issue of defection and defectors.

Consider: Within the american media, you hear quite often of cases that involve citizens of many different countries, cuba, russia, china, asian, african, middle eastern countries, defecting to america. It happens, these people, deluded into believing that america will provide them with a better, freer lifestyle, defect to america. In some cases, where the individuals have chosen to actively defy, challenge, and express condemnation of their governments, it is even True, that on an overall basis, the person might well be physically safer and better able to continue speaking out against the government that they hate, the government that is most responsible for their own personal victimization, after they have escaped the malevolent clutches of that government and defected to america. They will not enjoy greater genuine freedom in terms of a direct government to government comparison, but because their former government had an extreme, vested interest in stifling their freedom since they may have been actively speaking out against and/or trying to foment a revolution against the government, that former government obviously would have been likely to try and take away more of the specific person's freedom, than the american government is likely to do, simply because the person has not and is not speaking out against the american government. The american government is very happy when people defect to it from any other government. They publicly announce the news, instruct all media venues to report upon the defection, providing a great many details on the defector, his claimed motivations, etc..., even though such revelations do in reality pose a safety and security threat to both the defector and his family/loved ones, especially if he has family or loved ones who remain in his native country, as most defectors do.

Now, lets consider the reverse situation, a citizen of america defects to another country. It is the exact same event, isn't it?? It's a defection, exactly the same in terms of what occurs, regardless of whether a person defects to america, or whether a person defects from america. Surely a defection from america is just as newsworthy as a defection to america, isn't it? There is no rational, Truth-based reason for why defections to america would be considered major, newsworthy events, while defections from america would be considered totally insignificant, unimportant incidents that do not even deserve to be mentioned, much less reported upon or discussed. And yet this is absolutely what occurs in fascist america. It is clear to any student of Truth that at the very least, hundreds of american citizens renounce their citizenship and overtly choose to defect to other countries/governments, each and every year. More likely, the figure is in the tens of thousands, during most years. And yet think about this Truth: There is literally not an iota of news media reporting, and not a single official statement made by the american government, on any of these defections! This is why most american citizens, if asked whether they think/believe that thousands of fellow american citizens defect to other countries from america every year, would say No. This Truth has been hidden from them, by the american government and it's puppet media. If you were to try and obtain information from the american government on how many people defected to america last year, this figure would be provided to you. But if you inquired as to how many american citizens have defected to other countries, no such information would be provided. It is obvious that in terms of Truth-based journalistic purpose, the media of a society should focus much more on why people defect from the government that they represent, rather than focusing on why people defect to the government that they represent. Why? Because focusing on the defectors who abandon patriotic allegiance, would serve to reveal Truth. The defector could, and very likely would, explain why he has grown to hate his society/government, the faults, the lies, the malevolence that he has experienced and that he has come to recognize, within the society that he has chosen to desert and abandon. As always, your evil societies will stop at nothing to prevent the revelation of any type of valuable Truth. This is why the american government, as well as every other government, refuses to make any official statements on citizens deserting, abandoning, and defecting from their society, refuses to inform the news media of these defections, refuses to tell the news media how many people defect from their government/country, and terroristically coerces the news media into not reporting upon such defections. It is utterly outrageous, a brilliantly clear display of true fascism, engaged in by the american government to most likely an even greater degree than other governments. Think about it, you idiots: When an american citizen defects to a foreign country, the american government has a sacred obligation to provide as much information as it can to the american media, regarding the defection. It is a major, extremely newsworthy event, and it directly involves the government. Unless the defector chooses to overtly contact the media himself after defecting, or his remaining family members in america choose to contact the media, which is unlikely, the media will literally have no way of knowing that the defection has even occured, much less be able to provide even the sketchiest type of reporting on the event. The government shamelessly preens over defections made to it, making official statements, holding press conferences, overtly courting the media, instructing the media to report at great length on those defections, while at the same time not even informing the media of any defections made by american citizens to other nations. In fact the american government overtly hides, suppresses, and I am convinced will even directly lie about, such defections. This alone should be enough to prove to all of you citizen-slaves that your government is evil, lie-based, maliciously manipulative, and completely unworthy of your loyalty, allegiance, or patriotic support.

When was the last time any national TV, newspaper, magazine, or wire service company, based in america, conducted an in-depth interview with a defector from america, in which the defector is allowed to express and outline all of his reasons for having chosen to defect from america?? I do not recall having ever read or seen such an interview, not even a single one, even though there have been hundreds of in-depth interviews with people who have defected to america, in which they gush on about how happy they are to be in america, how they feel free and safe now, etc... CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel, ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, Time magazine, Newsweek, National Public Radio, PBS, US News & World Report, USA Today, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Associated Press, not a single one of these news organizations, despite having massive resources and manpower, has ever undertaken an in-depth investigative report upon american citizens defecting to other countries, or even conducted an in-depth series of interviews with such defectors, asking them point-blank to explain exactly why they chose to defect, and publishing their replies in complete, unedited form. Does any media reporter even know exactly how many american citizens defected from america in the year 2000? I think not, the government would either refuse to provide this information by claiming it does not "keep this statistic", or else lie outright. All the while, the media continues to gobble up government propaganda and patriotically reports upon the defections of people to america. This is the government/society which claims to be "wonderfully free, open and gloriously democratic, with freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc..." How pathetic! Your fascist rulers won't even allow you to hear the voices of your fellow torture victims, those who have found the personal courage and initiative to desert, abandon, and reject their american citizenships. People defect because they hate their society, because they have been personally victimized by their society. Out of 5 million people that a society victimizes, perhaps one finds the courage and insight to choose to defect. Every government refuses to allow it's defectors to gain any type of media attention or coverage, because every government is terrified that if allowed to speak out to his masses of fellow victims, the defector might help some of them, a handful at least, come to the realization that their very own society/government truly has brutally victimized them, and that they owe this victimizing entity absolutely no allegiance.

Lee Harvey Oswald was an american defector. He defected to the soviet union. To the best of my knowledge, not a single national news organization in all of america, ever bothered to report the news that a young american citizen, Lee Harvey Oswald, had abandoned and rejected the american government and the american "way of life" via a defection, until after he returned to america and carried out the infamous act that now guarantees him a permanent place within the historical record of human events. And yet if a citizen of the soviet union had defected to america at that same time, even on the exact same day that Lee Harvey defected from america, given the ongoing war mode of the late 1950's and early 1960's, it would have made front page news on every national newspaper, and been a lead story on both national radio and national television news. There ya go, the hypocrisy is mind-boggling, and once again I claim Game, Set, and Match, via yet another incredible demonstration of the power and the glory that is the revelation of Forbidden Truth.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America; and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. There it is folks, the pledge of allegiance. Read it, feel the fascist, the malice, the lies, behind literally every single one of the thirty-one words that comprise this pledge. Understand that helpless children, who have no possible way of intellectually analyzing the validity of such a pledge, have been and continue to be genocidally forced by adults and by the american government, to recite and embrace this fascist pledge, literally being forced to place their hand upon their heart, as part of the terroristic coercion process. This pledge is horrific. It is saturated with malice. It is designed to terrorize people into blindly agreeing to live as slaves, blindly agreeing to do whatever the american governmental leadership tells them to do, including sacrifice their lives. It insanely creates a fetish out of an ordinary piece of cloth that has been woven into a three colored, stripes and stars design. It has the audacity to include the word "liberty", when in reality it's entire purpose is to deny all human beings born into or living within america, the liberty and freedom to make a mature, adult, rational, unbiased choice and decision as to whether or not american society and the american government deserves their devotion, allegiance, support. It has the gall to proclaim that america offers "justice" to all, when the Truth is that america genocidally murdered native indians, genocidally enslaved blacks, genocidally discriminates against it's citizens, genocidally murders womb-trapped children, genocidally murders it's own tortured adult victim-creations via a death penalty, and has a judicial system that in every sense of the word, and from every possible angle, can only be seen as being utterly and completely unjust. "We sponsor the genocidal torture and victimization of our children, then we dispense justice upon them by punitively punishing them for reflecting back upon other human beings, the torture and victimization that we subjected them to." This is your "justice", and how any of you can even imagine, in your wildest dreams, that either you or your society has ever delivered a single moment of justice to any living thing, is utterly astonishing to me, and should be astonishing to any sane seeker of Truth.

Amazingly, the original version of this perverse pledge did not include any mention of god. The author must have figured that american citizens were so broken, so terribly addicted to, brainwashed by, the american government, that there was no need to invoke a terroristic threat from god, at the time he initially authored the first version of the pledge, back in 1892. This original pledge had several other minor differences from today's pledge, and read: I pledge allegiance to my Flag and to the Republic for which it stands: one Nation indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all. But guess what? Societal and governmental leaders soon realized that even the dumbest of the dumb can eventually begin to recognize an evil hoax when they are confronted with it's malevolent consequences on a daily basis, unless it carries with it a supernaturally terroristic threat and appeal from the invisible, omnipotent god creature. And so, in typically shameless fashion, your evil leaders changed the pledge in 1954, via a new law, enacted and voted into law by your elected congressional whore/representatives, that specifically added two words to the pledge, inserting these two words directly after the "one nation". The two words were "under god", so that the new and current pledge would read "one nation under god". Yes indeed, your leaders wanted to make sure you always remained too terrified to even think of rejecting your patriotic obligation to america, so they informed you that beginning in 1954, you are pledging your allegiance under god, which clearly is meant to inform you that god not only wants you to remain a loyal, patriotic american, but will punitively punish you if you dare to ever reject or renounce this "holy pledge" that you are reciting. The addition of these two words turned the pledge of allegiance into a holy document, adding an extremely major and useful layer of terrorization, and thus greatly strengthening the impact of the malevolent doctrine expressed within this brief text. Until 1954, you were not under a terroristic threat from god when you agreed and promised to pledge allegiance to america. But after 1954 you were under a terroristic threat from god. And given the fact that 99.999+% of all american citizen-slaves are genuinely addicted, to one degree or another, to the insane god myth, the impact of adding a terroristic threat from god to the pledge, was extremely significant and greatly added to the overall degree of utter fascism that has always defined the True nature of this pledge. Make no mistake, your supreme leaders knew exactly what they were doing, in adding these two perverse words in 1954. They added these words for the very specific reason of increasing the terroristic strength of the pledge, upon american citizens, in such a way as to brainwash citizens into believing that god himself wants them to remain loyal to the american government, and god himself will punish them if they violate this "holy" edict. Prior to 1954, the insane god myth was of course already being used by governmental leaders as a terroristic tool of nationalistic, patriotic coercion and oppression, but as regards the specific issue of the pledge of allegiance, there was clearly no type of a direct attempt to use the god myth within the pledge, until your evil leaders decided it would be terroristically useful to add this holy threat, in 1954.

One of the most incredibly blatant of governmental lies, at least with regard to america, a lie so obvious that even a monkey should be able to figure it out, is the utterly bizarre claim by american leaders, that there is a "separation between church and state", and that the american government operates as a secular entity and under secular ideology. That is ridiculous! It is such a bizarre claim that even I have trouble believing that you pathetic creatures can possibly consider it to be valid. There is absolutely nothing secular about the american government. It is totally saturated at every level, with insane god myth ideology. The government of america is religiously fundamentalist, just as afghanistan, iraq, etc... The insane god myth is used by the government as a tool of oppression and terrorization, to compel loyalty, patriotism, and the like, within religiously fundamentalist societies. Certainly america has constantly done this, and continues today. The notion of god existing is also overtly legitimized and promoted by religiously fundamentalist governments. America does this to a degree that may well exceed that of the Afghanistan or iraq governments. Every piece of monetary currency invokes the name of god in america. Every public speech by the supreme leader invokes not only the word god, but a demand/decree that god "bless" the government, via the "god bless america" excreta. The government promotes religion, changes the texts of extremely popular and influential governmental edicts to specifically add mention of god, as was done with the pledge of allegiance. The government rewards people who promote the insane god myth, by decreeing that churches and other houses of worship are not taxed, or at least have their tax amount greatly reduced. The government gives citizens the right to refuse to work at their job on the "holy day" of Sunday or Saturday, while restricting the ability of their boss to fire them for refusing to work on that day. At every turn and in every way, the american government overtly and terroristically imposes, sponsors and legitimizes the insane god myth to it's citizen-slaves, and I really cannot envision any genuinely valid way that any other government, afghanistan, iraq, or the like, can be said to exceed the immense level of religious fundamentalism that the american government operates under and within. The claim that those other governments "restrict" their religious fundamentalism to one specific version of the insane god myth, while america at least allows numerous different versions of the insane god myth to be "embraced and practiced" by their populace, holds absolutely no validity, since the Truth is that all versions of the mainstream, societally promoted god myth are identical in design, nature, and malicious scope. To declare and celebrate the right to embrace different versions of the insane god myth as constituting an "important freedom", is akin to declaring and celebrating as an "important freedom", the right to choose whether or not you are killed and eaten by a 350 pound lion, as opposed to a 400 pound lion. It is ludicrous on it's very face!

I could easily spend an entire page outlining the hundreds of different Truths that prove that the american government in no way deserves to be labeled as a "free democracy", and is in fact a religiously fundamentalist fascist dictatorship. But space and time are both limited, so I will limit myself to providing just one example of this proof. In america, there are five primary pledges/anthems/hymns/songs that are most commonly used by the american government to implant, maintain, and stir patriotic loyalty and devotion among the citizen-slaves. These five are: The pledge of Allegiance, America The Beautiful, The Star Spangled Banner, My Country 'Tis Of Thee, and God Bless America. Unbelievably and amazingly, each and every one of these governmental anthems, created, popularized, and promoted by a government that claims to be secular, not only overtly mentions god, but overtly uses the insane god myth within it's text, for the specific purpose of terroristically imposing the myth that god exists and that god likes the american government and wants citizen-slaves of america to support the american government. I have already discussed how the pledge of allegiance perversely had the words "under god" added to it, by the american government, in 1954. Next we have "America The Beautiful." This governmental anthem contains the lines: "America! America! God shed his grace on thee. America! America! God mend thine every flaw. America! America! May god thy gold refine. America! America! God shed his grace on thee. America! America! God shed his grace on thee. America! America! God shed his grace on thee. America! America! God shed his grace on thee. America! America! God shed his grace on thee." This governmental anthem is saturated with insane god myth promotion. The line "god shed his grace on thee" is repeated a total of six times within the singing of this anthem!

The complete version of the Star Spangled Banner, which is the official national anthem of the american government, includes the lines: "Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the heav'n rescued land, Praise the Pow'r that has made and presrv'd us a nation, And conquer we must when our cause is just And this be our motto: "In God is our trust." And the Star-Spangled Banner in triumph shall wave O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave." The message here is both that "god made, preserves, and loves america", and that all citizen-slaves must trust/believe in god. The anthem "My Country 'Tis Of Thee" includes the lines: "Our fathers' God, to Thee, Author of Liberty, To Thee we sing. Long may our land be bright, With freedom's holy light; Protect us by Thy might, Great God, our King!" Unbelievable, a nationalistic anthem in which citizen-slaves literally beg god to protect and help america, in reality of course the government of america.

And finally we have "God Bless America", this perverse national anthem is literally all about god, from the very first word of the title. It's entire design is to pound into the mind of all children and adults, the insane notion that god exists, and that god very specifically loves and blesses america, with lyrics such as: "God Bless America, Land that I love. Stand beside her, and guide her Thru the night with a light from above. From the mountains, to the prairies, To the oceans, white with foam God bless America, My home sweet home." So, all five of the most popular, best known, and officially decreed "anthems" of the american government, not only overtly mention god, but overtly promote the insane god myth! How anybody can believe that the american government is anything other than a fundamentalist religious regime, is mind-boggling.

Lets continue this dissection of Truth. Some governmental regimes have a political system under which threats of murder, torture, and the infliction of overt physical harm, are the most widely employed method of retaining the loyalty and devotion of citizens. Other governmental regimes have a political system under which brainwashing, coercion, and illusions of freedom/appeasement are the most widely employed methods of retaining the loyalty and devotion of citizens. The latter types of regimes like to refer to themselves as being "free democracies", and are constantly bragging about and proclaiming how wonderful they are, and how terrible the regimes that employ threats of murder, torture, and the infliction of overt physical harm, are. Now, if you happen to be on the direct receiving end of murder, torture, and physical violence, it is fair to say that you are likely suffering more than if you are on the direct receiving end of brainwashing, non-violent coercion, and false illusions. However, two very important points must be made. First of all, simply being threatened with murder, torture, physical victimization, is absolutely no more harmful than being coercively brainwashed via illusions and lies. And the reality is that communist/totalitarian governments are not interested in actually killing/torturing their citizen-slaves, but rather in making them fear the possibility of being tortured and killed, as a way to retain their subservient loyalty and devotion. Secondly, and much more importantly, we have the issue of realization of Truth. Citizen-slaves of communist/totalitarian forms of government are much more likely to come to the realization that their government is malevolent and deliberately, unjustly inflicting harm upon them, than citizen-slaves of "free democracies", even though the actual degree and magnitude of harm that is inflicted is usually at least as severe by free democracy governments, and oftentimes even more severe, than that inflicted by dictatorships/totalitarian regimes. There is always extreme value in recognizing Truth. Even if the citizen-slave is too broken and terrified to rise up in overt rebellion, simply by recognizing the Truth that his government is brutally victimizing him, the victim has taken a personally important step. Let it be clear that the degree of fascist oppression inflicted by free democracies upon their citizens, is every bit as severe and brutal as the degree inflicted by totalitarian dictatorships. The democracy simply relies more on brainwashing, illusions, and lies, while the dictatorship relies more on threats of death and physical punishment. Note the emphasis is on the word threats, which are in fact no more physically harmful in any way, than brainwashing, lies, and coercion is. Nobody ever died, or even suffered a broken bone, from being threatened. The fascist dictatorship is more honest, more truthful. It does not "cloak" it's malevolence to nearly the same degree as democratic governments do, and it does not rely nearly as heavily upon addicting it's citizen-slaves to a ton of perverse lies and myths. Instead of using lies and brainwashing to compel allegiance, it relies on threats of murder and torture. This makes the totalitarian government slightly more honest, and it also serves to allow more citizen-slaves to recognize that their government is brutally victimizing them. They still feel broken, helpless, unable to rise up against this oppressing force of malevolence, but they at least know that they are being brutally oppressed, which is not the case for the vast majority of citizen-slaves living in an ultra lie-based society like america. The american citizen-slave is being brutalized just as severely by his government, but he is far less likely to be able to recognize and realize this Truth, than a citizen-slave of a totalitarian government.

It is not my intention to promote dictatorships or "communist" forms of government as being "better" than those governments which label themselves as democracies. In some ways they are better, in a few ways, they are somewhat worse. The point is that the use of the term "better" is not appropriate, because all currently existing governmental regimes are overtly, brutally, genocidally malevolent towards their own citizens. It doesn't really make any difference that one form of government might cause slightly less overall harm to more of it's citizen-slaves, in some ways, than another form of government. This is because severe, unjustifiable harm is deliberately, maliciously caused in all cases, by all governments. However, there is value in analyzing the different structural designs of governments. To know your enemy gives you power, it gives you an advantage. To realize that governments which label themselves as democratic do a better job of cloaking the fact that they are brutally victimizing their citizens, is the first step, a very important step, for all people living within such regimes, to begin the process of coming to the realization and the acceptance of the Forbidden Truth that their very own government is brutally victimizing them.

It is time to discuss the issue of Elections. One of the fundamental arguments that "free democracies" make, in claiming to be a far superior and benevolent form of government, in comparison to other governments that they have chosen to demonize, is that they provide "free elections" to their citizens, thus allowing the citizens to choose for themselves, via a "popular vote", who becomes their supreme leader. The person who gets the most votes wins, and only retains this supreme leadership position for a few years, until the next election. Are elections a genuinely valid example of freedom, and of a superior form of government? Of course not! The entire ritual of popular vote elections is nothing more than a perverse sham and illusion, through and through. It does not offer freedom, it does not provide choice, and it in no way allows citizens to have any say in any of the ideological paths that their supreme leaders compel them to accept and follow. Democratic governments create this sham by first creating political "parties". In america, there are only two such parties that the supreme leadership has decided to empower, the democratic and the republican parties. A politician who wishes to become a supreme leader must agree to join one of these two parties. Both parties have strict ideological rules, and if any politician or to be more accurate, any person who wants to become a supreme leader within the society, refuses to accept and embrace these ideological rules, the political party refuses to accept the person into their party. So right off the bat we have utter fascism. The only way that any human being can have a chance to become the supreme leader of america, is by agreeing to adopt and embrace all of the ideological demands of either the republican or democratic party, to the satisfaction of the cabal of empowered agents of the existing regime, who comprise the leadership of both of these political parties.

Lets understand this: The american government tells you that you enjoy "free elections", the freedom to put into political office, by popular vote, any american citizen that you wish. But in reality, the election process is designed in such a way that there are only two human beings out of the entire population of america and the planet, that actually have any possibility of attaining the supreme leadership position, the presidency, as well as almost all other "major" elected positions, as a result of your vote. Those two people are the democratic and the republican party nominees. So your "free election" does not allow you to choose from among the approximately 280 million people living in america, it doesn't even allow you choose from among 280,000, or 2800, or 280, or even 28. You are given exactly two people to choose from, two out of 280 million, and yet you insanely seem to believe that you enjoy the "freedom" to elect your supreme leaders. Unbelievable! Now, you idiots might claim that it's okay because you "first" choose your 2 candidates, via the "party nomination" process, so in fact you initially had more than two candidates to choose from. Again, utter farce! Nobody can even get into the republican or democratic parties unless the leaders of those parties, highly empowered agents of the supreme leadership, decide that their ideology, as well as gender, age, ethnic background, personality, etc..., are "acceptable". There is absolutely nothing free or democratic about elections. Elections are pre-planned in advance, with the leaders of your government deciding exactly who is to be allowed to even have a chance of becoming the supreme leader, and this field of pre-screened humans is limited to a handful, all of whom must have already proven to the existing supreme leadership that they have, are, and will in the future embrace the exact same primary ideological path as the existing and past leadership has embraced. Under a dictatorship, there is no election, so only one "candidate" runs, and he is guaranteed to win. At least the citizen-slaves know, are able to realize, that they have absolutely no say of determining or impacting upon the nature of their leader, or the ideological path that their government takes. At least they know this Truth. But under a free democracy, the existing governmental leadership carefully chooses two people out of 280 million, making sure that they have differing positions on minor issues, so as to make it look like the citizens have a choice to freely elect whomever they wish and dictate the future policies of the government, even though the Truth is that both "party nominees" must have completely agreed to maintain and embrace all of the major ideological mandates of the existing regime, in order to have gained the nomination of their parties. The dictatorship offers one candidate out of 10-100 million people, the free democracy offers two candidates out of 280 million people, but both candidates must stand upon the exact same primary ideological mandates. How is that freedom? How does that allow the citizens to choose their leaders?? It's nothing but a complete sham and illusion!

Understand that your evil society created the "political party" system for the specific purpose of making sure that only two human beings, carefully chosen via a pre-screening process undertaken by existing supreme leaders, ever have any chance of becoming supreme leaders. This is pure fascism. And also realize that as far as the specific election for president, as well as almost all other national, state, and even city elections, an additional safeguard, the "nomination of the party candidate at the party convention or through a primary election", was added, just to make sure that there was no way that anybody not officially approved by the existing top leadership, could ever attain one of these two "party candidate" spots. And on top of everything else, a ridiculous, third party, last ditch "electoral college" system was put in, a system that prevents the individual vote for president from being counted as a "pure", direct vote, a system that could be easily manipulated and controlled by the existing governmental leadership in any type of an "emergency" situation, such as a charismatic outsider somehow finding a way to defeat this fascist, two-party dictatorship. Yes, your fascist leaders have made it 100% certain that one of only two people, both carefully pre-screened and directly chosen by them, will become the supreme leader, in every single "free" election that has ever occurred in america.

All successful politicians are accurate reflections of the lowest levels of immorality, insanity, perversity, rage, and Truth-hatred of the average, typical, citizen of the society they are seeking to attain political office within. You citizens will only elect a person who accurately reflects your own genuinely inferior natures and True Realities. Since you, as individuals and as a collective group, are immoral, insane, enraged, homicidal, addicted to lies and myths, and unable to even recognize Truth, as a result of the lifetime of brainwashing and victimization that your society and government have subjected you to, you will only elect as your leader, a fellow human being who shares all of these same immense character failures and perversions, as you are afflicted with. Your aspiring leader has to lie to you, he has to promise to help satiate your homicidal rage, he has to tell you that you are good and moral even as he promises to commit atrocities on your behalf. That's the only way he can win an election, and only people who are genuinely immoral and perverse, would lie to you, promise to kill for you, and demonstrate all of the inferior, self-reflective character traits that you seek in your leaders. What this means is that in dictatorships and totalitarian governments that have no elections, there is a tiny possibility that a genuinely superior and moral person might become the supreme leader. The odds are very slim, but it is possible, especially within a monarchy-dictatorship where the supreme leadership position is handed down "automatically", that at some point the new leader could have somehow avoided receiving the type of personal brutalization and victimization that renders the vast majority of all adults to be immoral, homicidally enraged, insane, and addicted to lies/myths. It's very unlikely, but possible. However, within societies that have elections, this is impossible, totally, 100% impossible. Why?? Because the existing leadership will only empower aspiring politicians who share their immorality, malevolence, and devotion to the existing deranged societal ideologies, but even more importantly, because the voting public consists of masses of insane, immoral, enraged, truth-hating citizen-slaves who would never elect as their leader, on either a national or local level, anyone who does not clearly demonstrate that they share the exact same insane, immoral, enraged, truth-hating, ideological outlook on life, as the citizen-slaves possess. So, this means that within an "monarchy" type of government, it is theoretically possible, although in practical terms extremely unlikely, that at some point, a person attaining the supreme leadership position might not be as totally evil, immoral, and insane as the average and typical member of the general population of the society is. The same is True for dictatorship regimes, in theory, a new leader who seizes power via a coup or the like, might be morally Superior to, less evil than, and saner than, the typical, mainstream citizen of the country. But within a "free democracy" government that uses to create it's supreme leaders, it is 100% impossible for anyone who is sane, moral, and not genocidal evil, to attain the supreme leadership position. This is because the populace will never voluntarily choose as it's supreme leader, any human being who fails to at least match, if not exceed, their own level of immorality, insanity, malice, and blood-thirst.

This is why no atheist could get elected to any major political office. 99.999+% of all citizen-slaves are addicted to the insane god myth, and so any Superior human being who recognizes that this is a ridiculous myth and refuses to lie and pander to the deranged masses, refuses to end his speeches with "god bless america", and reveals the fact that he is an atheist, thereby refusing to agree to terroristically impose the insane god myth upon you pathetic creatures, could not even get 0000.1% of the vote. You creatures will never elect anyone who is moral or sane, partly because your existing leaders will never allow a moral or sane person to obtain a political party endorsement, but mainly because you yourselves, you masses of "regular folks" who constitute the electorate, are not moral or sane. You will only elect someone who is an accurate reflection of you, while at the same time pretending to be moral, and benevolent, and telling you that you are moral and benevolent even as he overtly promises to continue and maintain the same societal policies of genocidal malice that you have sadistically enjoyed under the existing political leadership. Remember, an absolutely vital component of this toxic and perverse situation is moral justification through lies. Your aspiring leaders must be genuinely inferior, immoral, enraged, in order to win your support, but at the same time they must put on a surface display of morality and moral justification for their ideological positions, as a way of allowing you creatures to feel and believe yourselves to be moral and decent.

Consider this: As a general rule within the insane political structure of america, most members of the fascist republican political machine are encouraged to support the death penalty but to oppose abortion. Most members of the fascist democratic political machine are encouraged to do the opposite, oppose the death penalty but support abortion. There are a fair number of successful politicians who support both the death penalty and abortion, but there are almost no successful politicians who oppose both the death penalty and abortion. What Forbidden Truths can we glean from these facts? First of all, we can look at the issue of moral justification. You creatures, the mainstream citizen-slaves of america, are homicidally enraged. You want your society to authorize you to commit murder, and to also commit murder in your names, but at the same time you demand that your society provide you with enough moral justification so that you retain the ability to delude yourselves into believing that you are "good and decent" people, despite the fact that you are filled with homicidal rage and genuinely demand and seek out opportunities to kill fellow humans and morally superior animals, as well as relish such killings that are committed by others, in your names, under the legal auspices of your government/society. So, if your homicidal mindset is geared more towards violent vengeance, you might gravitate towards the mainstream republican political excreta. Relish murder being committed in your name via the death penalty, while at the same time adopting a deranged position of moral superiority by convincing yourself that you wish to protect the lives of precious, "innocent" children, by opposing the form of murder known as abortion, even though the Truth is that the "criminals" whose murders you celebrate and revel are in reality tortured child victims of your very own society. If your homicidal mindset is geared more towards personal empowerment and freedom to kill directly, or you feel the need to deny that you have homicidal rage towards human beings altogether, you might gravitate towards the mainstream democratic political excreta. Here you can subconsciously celebrate and revel in the murder of children via abortion, while adopting a conscious pretense/rationalization that the child being murdered is not in fact a human being. And if you are a woman of childbearing age filled with homicidal rage, you can directly embrace the legal and moral permission that your government gives you, in telling you that it's okay to murder your child while it is trapped within your womb. At the same time you maintain the illusion to yourself of moral superiority, by being opposed to the death penalty, under the mindset of those people being "real" human beings, not just "fetuses", and killing real human beings in such a cold-blooded manner is morally wrong. In both situations, you creatures get to embrace murder, revel in the commission of murder, but still maintain an illusion to yourself that you are morally decent and certainly not "homicidal", even though the Truth is that your positions are utterly immoral and you are in fact filled with homicidal rage. It's all a shell game! The pro death penalty folks feel morally superior to the pro abortionists, and the pro abortionists feel morally superior to the pro death penalty folks, even though all of them are supremely immoral. This is a primary role of the political system within an ultra-diseased society like america: To sanction and sponsor utterly malevolent and immoral expressions/release of homicidal rage among the citizenry, while at the same time making the citizenry feel and believe that they are morally superior and benevolent.

Now, within a few societies, such as america, some politicians who support both abortion and the death penalty will also be successful. This tells us that these societies are the worst of the worst, truly diseased to their very cores. There is so much suppressed homicidal rage among the citizenry of these ultra-diseased societies, that many people insist upon embracing not just one, often not even two, but numerous, different forms of murder, including hunting, war, euthanasia, abortion, the death penalty, etc..., but still they insist upon the government morally legitimizing these forms of murder, by declaring them legal and by having politicians offer ridiculous but eagerly embraced moral justifications for why each and every one of these different forms of murder, is perfectly appropriate from a moral perspective, to both commit and personally revel in. Finally, we know that any politician in america who overtly opposes both abortion and the death penalty, is very unlikely to win any major election, certainly not a state or national election. Why? Once again, it comes down to suppressed homicidal rage. The vast majority of the electorate possess homicidal rage within their True Reality. They seek legal and moral justification, as well as cathartic outlets, for their homicidal rage. If a politician is opposed to both abortion and the death penalty, the electorate will begin to feel, on a subconscious level, that this politician is different than they are. This politician is not a reflection of their True Reality. This politician makes them feel uncomfortable, because he seems to be presenting a morally superior image, an image that makes the electorate, subconsciously, begin to feel that the politician might be morally superior to them. This absolutely requires that the politician be demonized and rejected, in order for the homicidally enraged electorate to maintain their personal delusion of moral decency and superiority. 97+% of the electorate likely supports either abortion or the death penalty, because at least 97% of the adult population is homicidally enraged to some degree and must find outlets for this rage while still maintaining the personal illusion of moral decency. Abortion and the death penalty are two of the best, most easily justifiable forms of murder, for citizens of an ultra-diseased society like america. All politicians are expected to proclaim their support for the legitimacy of at least one of these two form of murder, so as to validate the delusions of moral decency/superiority that the members of the electorate live out their pathetic lives frantically clinging to.

It is clear to any Superior thinker that in a two-party democratic system of government, an illusion of the two parties constantly being at odds with each other on important social and national issues, is deliberately and artificially created and maintained. This is done for the purpose of strengthening the notion that voters have the ability to dictate important future governmental policy and ideology, by choosing one candidate over the other. Remember, in the vast majority of all elections, not just for the supreme leadership/presidential election, but for all other state, county, and even city elections, the existing governmental regime makes sure that there are only two candidates, both carefully pre-screened and selected by the two fascist political parties, who have any chance of actually winning. If both candidates adopted the same ideological platform in their campaigns, the illusion of the electorate having a "real choice, a real chance to dictate the future ideological path of their government", would be diminished. A handful of Superiors might even come to realize just what a perverse sham this notion of democratic free elections is. Therefore, the government and it's empowered political leaders have a major, vested interest in creating the illusion that the two political parties are far apart and have important differences on a large variety of major social, economic, moral, cultural, and other issues. It is clear to me that at certain points in time, leaders of the two political parties meet, and mutually decide how to divide up issues. It doesn't need to happen very often, since once a division is made, it is permanent and ongoing. Democrats chose to accept gun control ideology, republicans chose to accept anti-abortion ideology, etc..., to help foster this illusion of the two parties being ideologically different, for the purpose of enhancing the ridiculous myth and illusion that the american "free democracy" political system offers voters a real opportunity to dictate social policy, even though the Truth is that there are only two candidates, both pre-screened by empowered agents and members of the existing fascist regime. In addition, ridiculous notions such as one particular position on an issue being "politically correct", while a differing position is "politically incorrect", are employed to strengthen the illusion of valid and important ideological difference and choice existing, to you pathetic citizen-slaves.

The Truth is, none of these ideological issues are truly important or have any ability to change the overall path that the governmental leadership chooses to take. There is plenty of time after every election for all the elected whores to get together, consult with their party bosses, and decide what types of minor tweaks to the existing laws they can get away with making, as a pretense of keeping their campaign "promises". On a national level, such as congress and the house of representatives, any promise that does not conform with the chosen ideological path of the supreme leadership, is simply rejected by a vote of the majority of fellow elected whores, and the politician who made the promise is given "political cover". He tells his constituents: "I tried to keep my promise to you, but I just couldn't get enough of my fellow elected officials to go along with me." Of course there are some glorious exceptions, glorious to your evil leaders, that is. For example, the 9/11/01 terrorist attacks must have been met with secretive glee by most top political leaders, as they finally saw and seized upon an excuse and an opportunity to ram totally fascist new laws that greatly expand the totalitarian power of the american government, down the throats of the newly terrified citizen-slaves. But on most campaign issues, all that the two politician/whores are doing is "striking a pose" on minor issues that they really have no ability, much less desire, to actually change laws on, if they get elected. For example, the politician who campaigns on an anti-abortion platform almost always has absolutely no actual intention of trying to enact a law to make abortion illegal. This is true even if the politician does get elected and actually writes and introduces a proposed new law to ban abortion. In almost all cases, the politician knows even before he begins to author his bill, whether or not it has any chance of being enacted into law. And if he genuinely believed it might be enacted, he likely would not author it. Or he would author it in such a way that it comes with so many strings attached that it can't get enacted into law. So all the politician is doing is maintaining the "pose" that he adopted in his campaign. Same goes for those politicians who claim to be anti death penalty. It is just a pose, even if it is stridently maintained while in office. The truly powerful, supreme leaders of america know that a society as ultra-diseased as america is, needs to keep as many forms of legal murder as it possibly can, legal, so as to provide maximum cathartic release of homicidal rage for it's citizen-slaves.

All successful politicians are professional liars, and immoral, enraged, malevolent individuals. These are job requirements, folks. They have to have these character flaws in order to get you, the deranged, Truth-hating, immoral, homicidally enraged, sadistic electorate, to vote them into office. The lying is obvious and needs no explanation. Every aspect of life within a society like america is saturated with lies, myths, illusion. A politician who refused to lie could not even get 50 votes, out of a 500,000 electorate. Politicians have to convince their electorate that they share their immorality, rage, and malevolence, while still maintaining the illusion of moral decency. This illusion is extremely easy to maintain, since most politicians, just like most citizens, sincerely and delusionally believe themselves to be morally good and decent. It's not easy to fake being immoral and malevolent and filled with rage, to people who are themselves filled with these negative emotions/character traits. Simply by being a professional liar, the politician is well on his way to immorality. And the fact is that the vast majority of all citizens, including politicians, are rage-filled and malevolent. They wouldn't choose to become politicians if they were genuinely moral and benevolent. And for the handful of genuinely sincere, moral "do-gooders" who decide to seek political office, they are quickly "unmasked" by the electorate and soundly rebuffed. The mainstream, immoral, rage-filled electorate recognizes them to not be accurate reflections of their True Reality, and so they are automatically rejected, often with the rationalization that they "could not relate to the average person". In reality, the reason they get rejected is because they do not share the immorality, malevolence, homicidal rage, of the average person.

The question of whether political elections are "fixed" or rigged, might well be interesting to contemplate, but within a fascist two-party political system like america, in which the government has complete control over who gets elected, it is an irrelevant, moot issue. It's clear that the existing regime in america almost never cares to any significant degree which of their two chosen candidates gets elected, because both candidates have already received official pre-approval from their fascist political party bosses, and so both candidates are expected and in fact obligated, to tow the official party line of the existing regime, on all genuinely important issues, if they do get elected. Remember, there are only two candidates, and both of them have already been interrogated, screened, and officially chosen by either the democratic or republican fascist party bosses, and deemed acceptable to hold the office that they seek. If they were not deemed acceptable, the party would not have made the person their official candidate. Understand that despite the malicious illusion of "political combat" that is provided to you citizen-slaves in order to make you feel and believe that you enjoy "free" elections, the two fascist political parties in america, the democrats and the republicans, work hand in hand and share the exact same fascist governmental ideology on all truly major issues. It is clear that the democratic party bosses do not particularly care whether their democratic candidates win, and the same is true for republican party bosses. They pretend to care greatly, in order to maintain the illusion of a "free and open" democratic election. What they actually care greatly about, is to make sure that either a democrat or a republican, wins every election. They don't much care which one wins, as long as it's one of the two, and not an "outsider" who has bypassed the pre-screening process of both political parties.

This is because there is no essential difference between the democratic and republican parties. These are two governmental institutions that have been created for the purpose of pre-screening aspiring politicians, and for the purpose of carefully crafting campaign and election platforms that will maximize the illusion of free choice and the ability to shape governmental policy to you citizen-slaves, so that you insanely come to believe that the democratic, "free election" system is precious and wonderful, a glorious gift from your government that must be protected and valued at all costs, a system that sets you apart from all those terrible "dictatorships", even though the Truth of the matter is that your fascist, religiously fundamentalist government offers nothing that remotely resembles a "free" election, but rather the useless opportunity to pick one out of two carefully pre-screened candidates who have both received the official endorsement of the existing, utterly malicious and immoral, governmental regime, and who both are already beholden to supporting and embracing the ideological doctrine of the existing regime. It literally makes no difference which of the two wins the election, but in typical fashion, you brainwashed creatures ferociously cling to the delusion that you are "freely electing as your representative in the government, the candidate of your choice." In america, relatively few elections are "fixed and rigged" in such a way that one candidate wins. Why is this so? Because there is simply no need to fix and rig the election so that a single, particular candidate wins, because of the fact that all elections have already been fixed and rigged in such a way that only two pre-screen and pre-approved candidates can win! To fix and rig the election so that only one candidate can win, would compromise the illusion of "freedom", while the fixing & rigging of the election so that only two candidates can win which is what absolutely does occur within every single major election on all local, state, and national levels, is insanely perceived by you horrifically brainwashed creatures, as a demonstration and validation of your "freedom".

I want to emphasize again the value of knowing Truth within the reality of your day to day life. It may well be that on average, totalitarian dictatorships deny their citizens freedom, to a slightly greater degree than so-called free democracies. However, even if this is the case, the scale tips over to the other side when you consider the fact that so many more citizen-slaves living under totalitarian governments are at least consciously aware of the fact that they are being brutally and unjustly oppressed by their government, than is the case with citizen-slaves living under democratic governments. There is power in knowing and embracing Truth. There is even freedom, in knowing and embracing Truth. This power and freedom counterbalances any slight increase in victimization that some totalitarian governments might inflict. The bottom line is that severe, unrelenting, immoral, brutalization and victimization is undertaken by all governments, in fascist fashion, upon their own citizens. For the seeker of Truth, is not relevant or meaningful to split hairs in terms of trying to judge whether one government might be inflicting a tiny bit less or a tiny bit more severe brutalization upon it's citizens. It makes no difference, because the same severe, deliberate, brutal, unjustifiable victimization is committed. If someone drives a knife into your heart and walks off after making sure you are dead, it would be utterly ridiculous to proclaim that person to be worthy of the label "benevolent", just because some other person might have driven the knife into your chest, made sure you were dead, and then pulled the knife out only to drive it in again. The result, the consequences, would be exactly the same. And this is the analogy that we must recognize as we look at the universal harm, malice, and malevolence displayed and inflicted by all governments towards their own citizens.

No government has ever held an election that was "free". Every election is inherently fascist, as are all political systems. In an election, the supreme leaders of a government and their top appointed agents, get together and decide who they will allow to succeed them. In the vast majority of governments, this pool of hand-picked successors is limited carefully whittled down to a grand total of two human beings. You, the citizen-slaves, had no genuine say in picking these two "candidates", and if you believe that you did, then you are a brainwashed fool. Your existing governmental leaders are the ones who chose both of your candidates, and therefore what you have is not an "election", but a puppet show, an illusion, a sham. You cannot choose your next leader, because your existing governmental leaders have already made the choice for you. They have carefully pre-screened and hand-picked two people that they will be perfectly happy and satisfied to have win the election. It doesn't matter to your existing leaders, which of the two candidates wins. The result is the same, the existing leaders get what they want. They get to place exactly who they wish, into elected office, just as the totalitarian dictator does. Only difference is, the totalitarian dictator does not put on a sham and a fake illusion of "election freedom" to his citizen-slaves. He simply declares: "This one human will become your new supreme leader, I declare it and you have no say in it." The democratic government leader is saying, not verbally of course: "One of these two humans will become your new supreme leaders, I declare it and you have no say in it." No, the illusion of the populace having a say, must be maintained. I simply find it mind-boggling that you creatures are so detached from sanity that you genuinely seem to believe that you do enjoy a "precious freedom" in being able to cast a vote for one of two "candidates", while lacking all ability to recognize that both candidates are the same, both candidates have been manipulated into the position of having a chance to win the election, by an utterly fascist political party system that is only different from a communist/totalitarian regime in one major regard: The totalitarian regime is more honest, and relies less on brainwashing and the implantation of irrational, illogical, insane belief and ideology within the minds of it's citizen-slaves. The democratic government panders to, terrorizes, and bribes it's citizen-slaves. It pretends to be interested in whatever "issues" the masses of citizens are interested in. If the slaves start to think that maybe the schools are deteriorating, in jump the politician/whores, promising to fix the schools if elected. If the slaves start to worry about becoming crime victims, in jump the politicians, promising to get tough on crime. The cycle of which issues you slaves seize upon, varies from year to year. But one thing never changes, the shameless, endless pandering. They know that you do not actually want to be free. You want to suck on a comforting teat. You want your supreme leaders to say that they care about you, that they will make your life better. But the Truth is that they are responsible for having made your life the tragedy it is, and you creatures don't even have any idea of just how much victimization and injustice you have actually been subjected to, thanks to a lifetime of ideological brainwashing. Terrorization is part of the same package, it goes hand in hand with pandering, even though the two activities may seem diametrically opposite. Democratic governments use the demonization of foreign government regimes as a tool of terror, akin to a sadistic baby-sitter telling a frightened child who has just woken up from a nightmare that there is in fact an evil boogeyman in the closet. "The Boogeyman is gonna get you!!", yells the baby-sitter, terrorizing the child. In the exact same manner, a democratic government like america is constantly yelling out: "The communists are gonna get you!" "Saddam is gonna get you!" "Fidel is gonna get you!" "Osama is gonna get you!", as a way to terroristically obtain the loyal devotion of it's very own torture victims, the american citizenry. The truly perverse aspect of this is the fact that america constantly, shamelessly, deliberately provokes and incites the leaders of other societies, as well as demonizes them, in it's desperate efforts to make the ongoing demonization efforts seem real. The "threat" has to be made to look as legitimate and real as possible, in order for maximum terror effect to occur.

The third piece of this perverse puzzle is bribery. Bribery works beautifully in capitalistic societies, even more so than in communist societies, because the public obsession with obtaining material goods and wealth is much stronger. The republicans target the rich & middle class, the democrats target the poor and underclass. Each tries to demonize the other, in order to create the illusion of the electorate having an important choice to make in terms of who they vote for. The republican promises to help protect and preserve the material wealth of the middle & upper class, bribing them with the threat that if the democrat wins, they will face losing their money. This threat causes the middle & upper class to not only vote for the republican candidate, but to actually give away their money to the republican political party, under the belief that the party will help protect their remaining money! The democrats promise to help the poor and underclass make and get more money and material goods than they currently have, bribing them with the threat that if the republican wins, they will end up losing even more of their money and getting even poorer. This threat causes the already dirt poor democratic electorate to give away whatever meager sums of money they might have saved up, to the democratic party, under the belief that once "their" candidate wins, he will help them to make more money. It's all a shell game, folks! How blind can you be? The two party system is carefully set up in such a way that your malevolent, immoral, con-artist politicians bleed everyone dry, the rich and the poor alike, using bribery, threats, and pandering. And at the same time, they are constantly scheming and planning out, amongst themselves, how best to maintain the illusion of the electorate having a "free and very important choice to make" by voting in elections. If the republicans and the democrats both went after the rich vote, in a two party fascist government like america, horrific consequences might well result. The poor might rise up and try to create a "rogue" third party, and find someone to vote for who claims to be interested in representing their interests. No way would the fascist two party system of america ever allow that. The republicans and the democrats decide, amongst themselves, that one side has to pander to, bribe, and terrorize the rich & middle class folks, while the other side has to pander to, bribe, and terrorize the poor and underclass folks. This way, everybody wins! The fascist government gets money pouring in from all sides, all the citizen-slaves remain deluded into believing that their "party" is worth supporting and voting for, the ridiculous illusion that it makes a difference which of the two candidates wins, is maintained, and the two party fascist government maintains it's stranglehold of malicious power over the entire populace. Yes, it is certainly true that totalitarian governments pander to, terrorize, and bribe their citizen-slaves. They devote more effort towards terrorization however, and somewhat less towards bribery and brainwashing. But the distinction is not all that significant. And as I have repeatedly revealed, all governments function within essentially the same malicious parameters. The minor variations in tactics, are not of any great consequence and not worthy of extreme focus. What is worthy of focus is exploring the methods by which governments obtain and retain the loyalty and devotion of their very own tortured victim-creations.

The democratic system of government succeeds in maintaining it's stranglehold of power with few if any "internal" revolutions, specifically because it invalidly claims to offer it's citizen-slaves a way to change the government in a "civilized" manner, via elections, rather than by violent overthrow. The problem is, it's a sham! No election can ever truly "change" a government, because the governmental leadership that is in place, controls, structures, and dictates the parameters of every election, long before the actual election takes place. The only way to legitimately "change" a government, is to overthrow it by force. People in totalitarian dictatorships usually recognize this Truth to some degree, which is why there are somewhat more violent internal revolutions within totalitarian regimes than within democratic regimes. Of course democratic regimes use this fact, of there being more frequent violent revolutions and overthrow of government within totalitarian dictatorship forms of government, to spread the propaganda/lie that the reason there are more violent revolutions is because those totalitarian forms of government are more evil and terrible. Not true! The True reason is that the citizen-slaves there are not laboring under the delusion that an "election" can or ever will change the structure of any oppressive government. The election ritual itself, in addition to being a totally unfree farce, directly and in a very significant manner serves as a primary method of getting victimized and brutalized citizens to accept the legitimacy of their government. The insane mantra is repeated over and over, generation after generation, "It's okay, we just have to wait till the next election, then we can change the government. We are free to choose our leaders via the election process, so there is no need for a revolution, no need for violence." The Truth is, you are not free, you do not choose your leaders, and you can never change anything about your government from within the voting/election ritual, because your government, the same one you might say you are trying to change, controls, dictates, and decides every important aspect of every election, most especially who gets to have a chance to win every election. All you are doing is choosing between two malevolent liars and con-artists, both of whom have already completely abdicated their independence, have cast aside all morals, and have obtained the official support of the malevolent and fascist supreme leaders of the existing government/regime, something that they never could have obtained unless the existing leaders were 100% convinced that the "candidate" is totally broken and will tow the party line, not changing anything of importance, not defying the mainstream, existing governmental leadership, in any meaningful way, if they were to get elected. So you creatures who pose as "social activists", who try to dictate governmental and ideological policies by striving to elect the candidates of your choice, are in reality impotently and laughingly spinning your wheels in a ridiculously futile exercise. Your "choice" is not a choice at all. It is a shell game, and it involves two people who have already been hand-picked and pre-screened by the fascist leadership of your government, posing and pontificating opposite opinions, and trying to demonize each other, all for the purpose of strengthening the illusion that they represent your "free" choice and independent ability to decide who you want as your leaders within your government.

It is time to offer a few Truths on the topic of anarchy and anarchists. Anarchy is dictionarily defined as The absence of government or control, resulting in lawlessness. An anarchist is dictionarily defined as A person who believes that government and laws are undesirable and should be abolished. Let me begin with the fact that all governments are evil and immoral. They create malevolent, in fact genocidally immoral and harmful/deadly laws and ideological policies that they terroristically impose upon their citizen-slaves. Regardless of whether or not you might philosophically believe that some laws are "necessary" in order for you to enjoy a decent quality of life, the Truth remains that no currently existing government has any moral, ethical, or legitimate authority, to enact or impose any laws upon it's citizens, because the government itself is immoral and unethical. It is not benevolent, it is malevolent. It chooses to genocidally harm it's own citizen-slaves. The laws that it enacts and enforces are not benevolent. They are specifically designed to victimize, oppress, harm, even kill, human beings that the government itself, through it's malevolent societal and cultural structure, is directly responsible for having already inflicted immense torment upon, as helpless children. If an "absence of government" were to result in lawlessness, it is clear to any sane thinker that the ultimate ramifications of this lawlessness would not, could not, result in a greater degree of suffering and injustice than already exists, and is in fact directly caused by, the existing laws that governments are using to terrorize and brutalize their own citizens on a mass, genocidal scale.

An anarchist is a philosophically and intellectually Superior individual who is able to recognize that the government he is living under, as a citizen-slave of, has no moral, ethical, or other legitimate authority to impose it's malevolent structures upon him. He recognizes that his government has victimized him, is victimizing him, and seeks to victimize him in the future. He recognizes that the goal of his government is to rob him of his freedom, and dictate his life path within it's perverse, immoral, fascist framework. Further, he usually recognizes that all currently existing governments seek to impose this same injustice, victimization, and fascism upon their citizens. These realizations alone, render the anarchist intellectually Superior to all humans who believe in either the benevolence or the legitimacy of their government. As you might expect, all governments relentlessly demonize anarchists and all anarchy "movements", recognizing that such movements, if they became popularly accepted, would immediately begin to pose a direct threat to the existing regime. Perversely, governments demonize anarchists by declaring them to be "violent outlaws", even though the Truth is that every government came to power via an outburst of literally genocidal violence. Witness the invasion of the north american continent and the totally unprovoked massacre of the native indians, when they dared to simply try and protect and preserve the land that they possessed and occupied. The only way that any government comes to power is via the violent, genocidal overthrow of an existing regime. The malevolent conquerers then proceed to enact "laws", and claim that there is a moral basis for the laws, but in reality the True purpose of the laws is simply to oppress, to control, to victimize, to punish the tortured children that the government itself is responsible for brutalizing, and the government itself totally violated these very laws that it later claims are valid and must be enforced, when it seized power. The hypocrisy is literally limitless! The government seeks to punish anyone who defies governmental law, even though the government itself was founded and gained power through utterly genocidal violence and immoral lawlessness. So, for a government to demonize anarchists by labeling them as violent or outlaws, is the ultimate in perverse hypocrisy.

The reality is that many anarchists are extremely non-violent. Many anarchists are sadly laboring under the naive and idealistic delusion that social change can be accomplished simply by revealing the Truth of what government is and does, to the masses. That doesn't work. That cannot work, because you creatures despise and reject Truth at every turn. Still, a great many people who have embraced the legitimacy of anarchy, spend their entire lives doing nothing more than writing about, talking about, and trying to intellectually inform other people, about the malevolence and moral illegitimacy of their government, and of all governments. As you might expect, this type of approach accomplishes nothing of significance. A few humans, a tiny handful, are awakened to the Truth by the writings, speeches, and other intellectual revelations provided, and inspired to become anarchists themselves. But the malevolent governments are unaffected. They continue to steam-roll over the lives of all human beings, maintaining their stranglehold of fascist, brutal power. Let us understand clearly that all anarchist movements that have existed throughout the entire modern era of human existence, have failed miserably. They have not failed because they represent lies, hopelessness, or an impossible ideal. Quite the opposite! They have failed miserably because they represent Truth, hope, and the lure of genuine freedom. You creatures despise Truth. You live for hopelessness that is disguised to look like hope, rather than for genuine hope. You do not seek or desire freedom, but merely the perverse illusion of being free that only a fascist government can provide to you. Anarchist movements have never been able to attract many followers, specifically because anarchy represents Truth, freedom, and genuine hope. Not merely Truth, but Forbidden Truth. The Forbidden Truth that the government a person is enslaved by, that his grandparents and parents lived out their lives supporting and embracing, has no legitimate moral right to exist.

When anarchists adopt a position of non-violence, and let me be clear that some anarchists certainly do recognize that their ultimate goal must involve violence, they doom themselves to accomplishing nothing. Trying to appeal to the intellectual side of the Unwashed Masses, by philosophically revealing Truth to them, cannot and will not be successful. Just as this Manifesto will be rejected and demonized by 99.99999% of all humans who may read it. The Unwashed Masses cannot even recognize what Truth is, much less find the intellectual courage to embrace a Truth that runs counter to all of the most fundamental brainwashings that their society has subjected them to since the day of their birth. It is perfectly clear that all governments seized and attained their power through utterly brutal, genocidal violence and mass murder. And in this same fashion, the only way that any existing governmental regime can be toppled, is via utterly brutal, genocidal violence. This doesn't mean that any anarchist has any type of a personal obligation to be violent. It simply means that in order for this ideology to be based upon Truth, all anarchists need to overcome their naivete and idealism, to the point where they recognize and accept the fact that the only way their intellectualized ideological Truth has a chance of becoming a concrete reality, is through violence. There's no other way. Governments attain power through brutal violence, they maintain power through the terroristic threat of violence, and if they are to lose power, regardless of whether this loss occurs due to a "conquering invasion" or a "collapse" into anarchy, brutal violence must play a pivotal role within the actual process of toppling any government.

The question of whether human beings can exist and function without a government, is an interesting one. The short answer is: No. This is not because government is good or necessary, but rather because human beings have been rendered genetically diseased and ideologically crippled, as a result of hundreds of generations of brutal enslavement to and by governments. Human beings can only be free, if they reject the legitimacy of all currently existing governments and governmental systems. But the thing is, human beings do not want to be free. Genuine freedom and autonomy terrifies you creatures. At most, you want illusions of freedom, you want to delude yourselves into believing that you are free, but at the same time you are terrified of even the notion of having to deal with genuine freedom within your own lives. Governments rob you of your freedom, and make you happy to not be free. If, theoretically, an anarchist movement were to succeed in toppling a government, instead of rejoicing in their remarkable new freedom, the Unwashed Masses of citizen-slaves would fall into emotional chaos and begin to undertake a desperate effort to find a new "leader". This desperation would be quickly recognized by the most power-crazed and malevolent individuals within the society, and they would quickly band together and establish a new government, most likely an even more malevolent and fascist government than had previously existed. This even more evil government would be eagerly embraced by the Unwashed Masses, and all of it's fascism would be welcomed with open arms. The courageous leaders of the anarchist movement, who risked all to perform the most moral and benevolent feat within human ideological circles, the mass freeing of their fellow citizens from the brutal enslavement of a malevolent government, would quickly be captured, put on trial, convicted, and legally murdered by the new government, with the complete support of their fellow citizens, for daring to "upset" their tidy little world of embraced brutal oppression, masquerading as governmental freedom. Yes, you creatures, you intellectually and emotionally deranged creatures, would viciously turn upon and destroy your saviors, the people who rescued you from your malicious government. This is because you do not want to be free, you do not know what freedom is, and you are so broken, emotionally and intellectually, that the lure of freedom is what terrifies you, as you ferociously cling to the familiarity of systematic oppression and brutal governmental victimization.

A sane and healthy race of humans would thrive within an environment of anarchistic life. Laws could still exist within an anarchist society, but only laws of nature and of sanity. Laws of government, punitive, irrational, hypocritical laws, would be recognized as having no legitimacy and no right to exist, no right to be imposed by any human being upon any other human being. Let it be clear, the mainstream ideals of anarchy are genuinely noble, benevolent, and represent freedom in a True way, the most genuine type of societal freedom possible, the freedom to live life as an individual, unburdened by the toxic, fascist, enslaving, malevolent, genocidal structures, ideologies and mythologies of government. But there is no strength in nobility, there is no power in Truth, there is no value in freedom, for you pathetic masses of broken sheeple. And so the anarchist movement will continue to suffer ongoing, crushing failure, just as it has in the past. The anarchists are not failures. They live their lives bathed in the glow of at least some genuine Truth. It is their attempts to enlighten you humans to the True nature of government, that fail. And this failure is not their fault, it does not reflect badly upon them, but rather it reflects and illustrates the inferiority of you creatures. It is your failure, your inability to overcome the lifetime of brainwashing and maliciousness that your governments have imposed and inflicted upon you.

It's interesting to note how many governments, like america, in demonizing anarchists, put forth the notion that most anarchists are "bored rich kids who have enjoyed all that our society has to offer and are just idly searching for something to rebel against." This is demonizing propaganda, and nothing could be further from the truth. Yes, many people who would label themselves as anarchists are quite young, children in fact, since every person under the age of 28 deserves to be considered a true child. The reason why many anarchists are young, is because between the ages of 12-26, tortured victims of a government/society have often developed the personal insight as well as the intellectual understanding, to recognize the root causes of their distress and suffering, while at the same time also recognizing that their ability to recognize and embrace Truth is still, slowly, being snuffed out. And so they take a final stand, trying desperately to save themselves, by embracing the Truth of their lives. Sadly, by age 26-30, many victims have been totally broken and become burned out. They abandon the Truth, they abandon the anarchy movement, the lifetime of daily brainwashing that they have been subjected to at the hands of their society finally overwhelms them, and they tragically begin to embrace their government, it's perverse rituals and ideologies.

To a degree, it can be argued that the anarchist movement has become a political system in it's own right. Some people who consider themselves anarchists seem and act more interested in "reforming" governments, than in exposing them as the utterly malevolent entities that they are, and toppling them. But such individuals do not deserve to carry the label of anarchist, it does not accurately apply, even if they claim the label for themselves. We must never compromise Truth, no matter how consistently any Truth may be rejected, ridiculed, and condemned by the masses. No currently existing governments can be reformed, they are malevolent structures, diseased to their very cores, fatally flawed. Just because the anarchist movement has totally failed, and there is no chance that the True anarchist movement will achieve any success in the foreseeable future, is no reason for anarchists to abandon or compromise the inherent validity and superiority of their ideology, by "softening" it. Truth stands, it does not need to be embraced by many, or accepted by anyone. It will always stand on it's own, stand on it's own merit, proud and tall and precious. It is up to the Superior individual to rise up to the standard that Truth sets. Embrace Truth, defend Truth, reveal Truth, never compromise Truth in an effort to gain acceptance or to achieve some illusion of success, or to establish a lowered ideological standard that might be more palatable to the inferiors who reject Truth. This is a betrayal of self and a betrayal of Truth itself. Never lower yourself to an inferior level, this is a perverse art that the inferiors have mastered. Simply stand, tall and proud, together with Truth, and celebrate your Superiority.

Okay, on that inspirational note, lets continue this dissection. A few more Truths must be revealed on this issue. I want to emphasize the importance of understanding and knowing what a "right" is. Most governments are constantly informing their citizen-slaves that they "enjoy" all sorts of important individual and human "rights". In particular, fascist governments which label themselves as free democracies, are constantly flogging this dead horse notion to their citizens, informing them that they must be eternally grateful for all the rights and freedoms they enjoy. The vast majority of these "rights" are nothing more than illusions, pale images of false and invalid freedom. Useless rights that serve to provide a beautiful smoke-screen to cover up the brutal fascism of the government. Voting and elections are a perfect illustration of this Truth. You creatures perversely believe that having the "right to vote in elections, to choose leaders", is a perfectly legitimate right, a very important right, and a demonstration of your personal freedom. You hold these ridiculous, transparently invalid notions specifically due to having been subjected to a lifetime of brainwashing by your society, and having totally lost the ability to think rationally or to recognize the Truth of any situation. The Superior thinker, whenever the notion of having a right or freedom is presented to him, immediately begins performing a Truth-based, analytical examination, of whether what he is being told represents a "right" and/or a "freedom", is in fact a right or a freedom. In the vast majority of situations, it immediately becomes clear that the right and/or the freedom is nothing more than an illusion, sham, and does not in fact exist as a valid entity. When your society tells you that you have the "right to elect your leaders by voting", the Truth of this "right" is as follows: You have the right to embrace the toxic myth that in voting, you are able to influence the ideological paths that your government takes in the future. The only right you truly enjoy, is the right to delude yourselves in a comforting way, a way that strengthens the fascist stranglehold of malevolent power that your government currently has over you. The notion that being able to vote constitutes not merely a right, but a genuine "freedom", is even more detached from any semblance of Truth. What freedom does the democratic, political party/election system of government provide?? The only freedom that is provided, as I have proven in my above revelations of Truth, is the freedom to embrace the delusion that you enjoy freedom, under such a governmental regime. You are free to embrace a ridiculous, toxic lie, that's the extent of the genuine freedom you enjoy, as citizen-slaves.

The value of the freedom to vote that you enjoy within democratic governmental regimes, is exactly parallel and comparable to the freedom that you were to enjoy if you were locked in a small room, containing no water or food, a room that has two doors, one door leading to a locked cage where a 400 pound man-eating lion lives, the other door leading to a locked cage in which a 380 pound man-eating tiger lives. "Look, you are free! You have plenty of choices and options. You can choose to stay in the room, die of starvation/dehydration. You can choose to enter the lion cage and get killed & eaten by him, or you can choose to enter the tiger cage and get killed & eaten by her. You enjoy freedom, celebrate and rejoice in your freedom! If you were living under a totalitarian government, you wouldn't have this wonderful freedom to choose from among three different ways to suffer a horrific fate. But thanks to our wonderfully free democratic regime, you have a real choice." You see folks, this is the utterly deranged rationale that you brainwashed creatures embrace, and I gotta admit, it boggles my mind, even knowing how stupid and inferior you all are, that you can't even see through the most obviously transparent lies, when they are delivered together with the "official" governmental and societal lies and myths that you so desperately seek and cling to.

We need to go back to the media issue for a few paragraphs of additional Truth here. It must be understood that the role of the media, acting as agents of the existing governmental regime, is extremely major, in fostering support and loyalty to the existing government. In my War essay above, I outlined how the media is used to promote war. And within the political arena, this usage of the mass, mainstream media reaches even greater heights of incestuous and fascist levels. Very simply, the mainstream, national media in a country like america, neither enjoys nor practices any type of journalistic freedom or independence, on the issue of politics. The existing government itself, sets all of the "rules", instructs the media on exactly how to structure it's coverage of the election ritual, and the leaders of the media absolutely feel and believe that they have no choice but to embrace all of these rules, just as they are compelled to embrace the notion that their existing government is legitimate and must be supported and obeyed. After all, they live as citizens, they are subject to all of the same fascist laws, rules, and decrees of the government that they live under, as any ordinary citizen is. The government of america operates under a 2 party fascist dictatorship. The government demands that the media uphold and promote the legitimacy of this 2 party system of government, and the media absolutely feels and behaves as though it has absolutely no choice but to do exactly this. No mainstream, national media source would dare to challenge the legitimacy of the american political process, because that would be decreed by the government to be "unamerican" and a betrayal of the loyalty/devotion that all citizen-slaves, most especially those who have been allowed to attain wealth and influence, such as the owners of large media companies, are terroristically ordered to display to the government. The government puts forth it's two pre-screened candidates, and instructs the media that because only these two candidates have any chance of winning the election, the media has a patriotic as well as a journalistic obligation to design it's coverage of the "campaign" in such a way that all serious focus and attention is devoted only to these two candidates, who have already received the official blessing of the existing governmental regime. The media, like the whores that they are, dutifully agree to legitimize these two candidates, and only these two candidates, as being the only fit, appropriate, and available options for the electorate to choose from. "Cover" for this perverse sham is provided by "primary" elections, in which the two parties pick their candidate. So an "election" has already taken place, and the media has better cover to be able to claim journalistic independence, even as it obsessively focuses upon only the two "remaining" viable candidates, after the republican & democratic primaries have occurred.

Within the political debate arena, which is also run by the media but by the government, the republican and democratic puppet-electees are always "headlined", usually allowed to face off one on one in their debates, so that the electorate naturally come to the conclusion that the only two people who can possibly win the election, are the two party nominees. Sometimes a 3rd or 4th person is allowed to participate, such as an "Independent" candidate, but the design of the debate is such that the focus is on the two party nominees, and both nominees interact with the "outsider" as though he has no genuine importance within the debate. This is to make sure he has no real chance of winning, since psychological studies prove that human beings will never vote for a person that they feel has no chance of genuinely winning, in volume sufficient to allow such a candidate to win, even if they were to totally agree with his ideological positions and even if they liked him much more than the two party nominee candidates. Any aspiring holder of political office who holds any type of truly "radical" positions, no matter how popular he may be, is automatically excluded from all major, televised types of debates. This is to make even more sure that such an outsider has absolutely no chance of winning, or of disseminating his societally unacceptable positions via the mass media.

The media is in direct collusion with the government, in having adopted this utterly fascist system, which is a complete farce with regard to the issue of free government. If a government were truly free, the media would feel obligated to provide at least as much coverage, and in fact more coverage, to "radical" and obscure ideological/political groups, than to the two mainstream political parties. Why? Because the only way that the citizens stand any chance of making a truly free and independent choice regarding their governmental structure, is if they know and are informed about, all of the different options that they have, and any free media would adopt as it's primary agenda, a responsibility to freely inform it's viewers/readers about all available options, ideologies, and viewpoints, making sure that the less well-known an ideology might be, the more attention it is given, in order to provide an equal opportunity for all options to be fairly considered. Because america is a fascist dictatorship, just like all governments, it refuses to allow the media to provide any legitimate options to the citizen-slaves, beyond the "re-election" of the existing regime, which is a two party dictatorship masquerading as a "free" government that offers citizens the chance to choose one of two politicians, one from each political party, to lead them. In a free system of government, every political debate would include at least one representative of every form of government and every significant ideology that exists in the world, equal and fair media attention would be given to each ideology, and each "candidate" would argue not only why they should become the next leader, but more importantly, why their ideology is superior. So, every debate for president in america would involve a republican, a democrat, a communist, a totalitarian, a religious fundamentalist who wants to impose one religion upon the citizens, an atheist, an anarchist, several racial purists who seek to divide the whites from the blacks, the blacks from the whites, etc... Each "candidate" would not only argue for why they believe they should become the next governmental leader, but more importantly, they would argue why their specific cultural ideologies and proposed system of government, as well as the rejection of all governmental legitimacy, in the case of the anarchist position, should be embraced by the population. This would be how a legitimate government operated, a free government operated, providing genuine options to it's citizen-slaves, the option of choosing a different type of governmental structure/system, even the option of rejecting all governmental authority to rule over them, within the "election" process. But no, instead we get a worthless sham of an election in which the fascist regime puts forth two pre-screened puppet/prop candidates, who pretend to be at odds over important issues, for the purpose of selling the illusion to you citizen-slaves that you somehow enjoy a precious freedom in being allowed to choose which of these two pre-screened puppets, both of whom represent the exact same, existing government, will become your new "freely" elected leader. How incredibly perverse!

Some of you might be thinking that an anarchist would have no place at a political debate, since he would be opposed to governments as a principle, and not interested in becoming the leader of any new government. Others of you would likely argue that a proponent of a totalitarian regime would stand no chance of being elected to lead a currently "free democracy" government. These arguments are invalid. The only way that any societal system can be said to offer freedom, freedom of choice to it's citizens, would be if genuine freedom, the freedom to reject the existing empowered system, the freedom to reject all authoritative rule as well as all current members and nominees of the existing system, was provided to the citizens as a legitimate, viable choice. What possible legitimate authority can a government have, to decree that it's existing design structure must be maintained, and to put forth "nominees" on it's behalf to become future leaders, and still claim to be free? That is not freedom, it is fascism, by design, by structure, and by implementation. Fidel Castro will not allow his citizen-slaves to choose a free democracy form of government. Saddam Hussein will not allow his citizen-slaves to choose a christian religious fundamentalist form of government, and in exactly the same fascist manner, George Bush will not allow his citizen-slaves to choose a totalitarian, moslem religiously fundamentalist, or any other form of government other than the existing christian religiously fundamentalist government that he labels as a free democracy. There is absolutely no difference between these three forms of political fascism, and the fact that the existing american government utterly and completely refuses to allow it's citizen-slaves the freedom to legitimately choose for themselves who will lead them in the future and what type of government they will be ruled by, proves that there is not an iota of genuinely greater personal freedom within the american governmental structure, in comparison to any other existing government. The illusion and myth of freedom that is put forth by the government, is stronger in america, and this actually serves to make the american government more repressive, more malicious, because it denies citizen-slaves the opportunity to easily recognize the True facts of how brutally unfree and totalitarian their government really is.

A few comments on political punditry now. What is political punditry? It is a process, sponsored by governments like america which claim to be free, in which political parties hire "operatives", and instruct them to go within the media sphere and stridently promote/argue a particular political ideology, for the primary purpose of convincing citizens that they have a real, legitimate, and important choice to make, in terms of who they vote for in elections. In america, there are only two political parties, and both work together on hiring and putting forth a literal army of political pundits, who flood every major TV, radio, newspaper, and news magazine news outlet, constantly engaging in ridiculous "debates" and editorial efforts in which they try to foster the notion that ideological differences of major importance exist between the democratic and republican political parties and agendas. This is done in order to enhance and increase the illusion of freedom and choice, within the ritual of elections. Most political pundits are in reality great friends. They pretend to be fiercely at odds with each other, especially within televised sham "political debate" shows such as Crossfire, because that is their job. To provide the illusion that the american governmental system is free and open, and that the political process is a free one. They are nothing more than actors, hired to put on a show for the propaganda purpose of creating an illusion of legitimacy to the american political process. To cloak the utter fascism and completely unfree nature of this political system, and most importantly, to cloak the Forbidden Truth that all elections involve no freedom of any kind, but in fact a worthless, pointless, totally unfree "choice" of picking one of two candidates, both of whom are direct agents of the existing regime, who have the complete support and approval of the existing regime.

Some political pundits specialize in debating each other. Understand that they have absolutely no interest in "winning" any debate. Their interest lies in putting forth a credible illusion that their particular political party has an ideological stance that is significantly different from the ideological stance of the person they are debating, who represents the other political party. By creating this illusion of "important difference", the illusion of citizens having the freedom to choose from among two importantly different governmental ideologies, is maintained and enhanced. Even though the Truth is, of course, that the american government has only one primary ideology, an ideology that both political parties jointly embrace. The two party "system" of government was created and is maintained for the sole purpose of causing a false illusion among the citizen-slaves, that they enjoy the freedom to make important decisions on who they elect to become their governmental leaders. Other political pundits specialize not in debating each other, but rather in delivering long monologues on why their particular political party has the "right" ideology, and why people should support their political party. Again, in the vast majority of cases, these pundits have no interest in actually winning viewers/listeners/readers over to their position or party. Their interest and their job, is to create the illusion of political and governmental freedom within america, by constantly delivering a brainwashing mantra of "Look here people, this is what we, the republicans, believe in. This is our ideology. It is very important, and the things that the democrats believe in, their ideologies, are completely different and wrong. So, it is very important that you support the right party, and vote for the right people." The pundit does not in fact care who you vote for. He doesn't care whether you believe the political party he is pitching is right and good, as opposed to wrong and bad. All he cares about is that you buy into the illusion that one of the political parties is good and right, while the other political party is bad and wrong, and that it is very important that you embrace and support one political party over the other. That is his mission. If you do buy into this insanity, you also buy into the notion that your government is free, that it offers you a very important and valuable choice on what ideological path your government takes in the future, and that the utterly fascist two party system of dictatorship is perfectly legitimate and free. A pundit like Rush Limbaugh is given tremendous power and influence for this malicious purpose. He is given I believe four whole hours per day of nationwide radio time, to drone on and on and on about how and why he believes the republican party is better than the democratic party, and that citizen-slaves need to support the republican party or face severely negative consequences, due to the ideological differences that he ridiculously claims exist between the two parties. Most of you creatures who follow american politics would label Rush Limbaugh as being a "republican supporter", or an operative of the republican political party, trying to promote the agenda of the republican political party. But this is not true or accurate. Rush Limbaugh, as well as all national level political pundits, is indeed a governmental operative. But his primary mission is not to make people embrace the republican party. Or the democratic party, for that matter. His primary mission is to promote the legitimacy of the american political process and the two party political system of government. He is working on behalf of the government, to promote this invalid illusion. His job is to convince you that it is very important and an expression of your precious freedom, to choose one political party over the other and to support it fervently, based upon the lie that the two political parties have seriously different ideologies and that these two ideologies, only these two ideologies, represent legitimate choice within the political and governmental process. Is it possible that he might personally prefer that you embrace the republican set of ideological illusions? Perhaps. After all, he is an actor and a con artist, and most actors feel pride when they deliver a believable performance that is accepted by viewers/listeners. But it must be understand that his primary goal, like that of all political pundits, is not to get you to embrace the political party that he is hawking, but rather to embrace and accept the legitimacy of the american political system as a whole. If you grow to hate the republican party, to consider the party bad and wrong in it's ideology, he has succeeded. Because then you have bought into his lies, which represent the lies of the american government itself: The illusion that there are important ideological differences between the two parties, the notion that it is important that you vote, to keep the "wrong" party from winning the election, the notion that you enjoy a precious freedom in being able to choose between the two candidates of the two parties, etc... To sum up, the job of all political pundits is to convince you that you have a free choice to make, the ability and the responsibility to choose your political and governmental leaders via the election process. And the Truth is, no such choice exists. None. It's an illusion and it's a con, employed by a fascist and totally unfree governmental regime.

You will have noticed by now, that I try very hard to not capitalize the first letter of the name of any country, unless the name happens to begin a sentence. I do this with the word god too, refusing to capitalize the letter g. Some of you inferiors may be under the impression that I do this as a petty, insignificant, "protest" against society or societal ritual. This would not be an accurate impression, at all. There is a very important reason for my choice in this regard, a reason that extends right to the very heart of Truth. Throughout human history, societal leaders have maliciously used language and definition of words/terms/ideas, for the purpose of manipulating, controlling, and dictating the behaviors and beliefs of their citizen-slaves, on important issues. I will be writing a long essay devoted specifically to this Truth, later on within this Manifesto. For now, I just want to say a few words about this capitalization issue. As regards god, the language czars of america have decreed that "proper names" should be capitalized. However, the word god is not a proper name. It is a description of a mythical, non-existent creature. The letter g in god no more deserves to be capitalized as a proper name, than the letter M in the word mermaid, or the letter U in the word unicorn. Why is it that the language czars decree that mermaid and unicorn are spelled in lower case unless the word begins a sentence, but the first letter in the word god needs to be capitalized? It is because societal and governmental leaders have decided that the insane god myth needs to be terroristically foisted and imposed upon you creatures, the unwashed masses, as a form of fascist behavioral control. In decreeing that the letter g must be capitalized, the insane notion that the god creature actually exists, and even more importantly, that he is a superior and omnipotent creature who must be worshipped and obeyed, is delivered to you pathetic creatures.

The capitalization of the first letter of the names of countries, serves this same malevolent societal goal. It establishes an atmosphere of legitimacy to the fascist power that governments wield over their citizens. It legitimizes the government itself, creating the illusion that the right of the existing government to continue to exist, is at least as strong as the right of any individual to live and to exist, as evidenced by the fact that names of individuals are capitalized, and names of countries are capitalized in the exact same first letter manner. Just as the god creature is decreed to have omnipotent power over the lives of individual human beings, governments are decreed to legitimately have the same type of omnipotent power. Just as the ordinary citizen-slave is terroristically told that he has absolutely no right to defy, reject, or try to destroy "god", he is also terrorized by his existing governmental regime into accepting the notion that he, as a citizen-slave, has absolutely no right to defy, renounce, or attempt to destroy/overthrow, the existing government under which he lives. There is absolutely no reason why the name that a government has chosen to give to the land mass that it rules over, such as america, should be capitalized when the name appears in the middle of a sentence. All that capitalization does, is create a false illusion of omnipotent legitimacy and oppressive authority, for the existing governmental regime. We, individual human beings, must capitalize our Names. We deserve to see and to judge ourselves as being precious, valuable, unique, and most importantly, not under the fascist control and authority of any other life form or entity, existing or imaginary, not god, and not government. I capitalize all of my Names, including The Seer of Forbidden Truth, with limitless pride and a sense of genuine self-love that is immense in scope. At the same time, I proudly reject and refuse to accept the perverse language decree of societal leaders, that the word god and all names of all nations, should have their first letter capitalized. I do this in recognition of how malevolent this language decree is, and in tribute to my personal Superiority over all gods and over all governments/nations.

A few final revelations as we wrap up this essay. The fact that politics within democratic societies is structured along the same lines as organized crime/mafia families, is well illustrated by the fact that this malicious profession often is passed down from generation to generation, in such a way that political dynasties, based solely upon familial connectivity, are created. Witness the Kennedy family, with a long history of relatives pursuing political power. And the Bush family, none of you seem to be sane enough to recognize that under a "free" government, the chances of the son of an existing president, becoming president, within a nation of 280 million people, would be literally nil. The fact that the son of a former president became president, all by itself, proves that there is no such thing as a "free" election in america. Kings hand down their rule to their heirs, and american political leaders do exactly the same thing. Whether or not a direct blood relative receives the handoff, is not important. In some cases, like with Bush, this does occur. But the important Truth that we must embrace is that in every election, the existing leadership absolutely and completely controls and decides exactly who is to be allowed to attain all major elected offices within the nation. This proves that there is absolutely no freedom of any kind, no freedom to choose your own leaders, and no freedom to choose the style and type of government that rules over you, in any so-called "free democracy". Political and governmental power is decreed to be absolute, and within democracies, governments are run along the same structural design as organized crime families. Truth is never to be revealed, power and control is always to be consolidated and only handed down to those who meet with the approval of the existing leadership, and no genuinely benevolent consideration is ever given to those who are not within the leadership, unless they pay money to the leadership. Money is the key and the fuel to power and influence, within organized crime families and within democratic governments, in exactly the same operational structure. And if anything, there is a significantly greater degree of morality and decency within organized crime operating principles, than within democratic government operating principles.

I'm not going to devote a lot of space to the issue of money, as relates to politics, right here. The facts are obvious, and the entire issue of capitalism will be dissected at great length in my very next Essay. All that needs to be said is that having money is the key tool, an absolutely vital necessity, for any individual seeking to attain major political power, or any individual seeking to influence the policies of the government, under all free democracy regimes. Money is a toxic poison within the governmental structure, guaranteeing that at every turn and on a constant basis, the political decisions, governmental policies, and law enforcement edicts that a democratic government makes, will be immoral, malevolent, unjust, hypocritical, and genocidally harmful to citizens of the country, to citizens of other countries, and to the entire planet earth, all of it's inhabitants and resources. Politics is literally the business of extortion and bribery, the selling of justice, decency, fairness, morality. All successful politicians are betrayers of their fellow man, betrayers of planet earth and it's morally superior non-human life forms, betrayers of justice, morality, and Truth. Money is the primary fuel that drives the political process, and therefore money is the primary force responsible for inspiring these ultimate forms of betrayal.

I may have already mentioned the genocidally malicious, invasionary nature of governments briefly, in my War essay, but a few more comments are in order. Countries/governments operate along the exact same design structure as street gangs. They carve up territory, seize it by force, and impose their will upon the victims who are trapped inside. They also form malevolent alliances for the purpose of consolidating and increasing their power and covering each other's backs against possible threats to their power, or attempts by other countries/governments to respond to exert their authority. Countries like the former soviet union, england, and america, were/are bent upon world domination. To achieve this malevolent goal, they deliberately impose their will upon people located on land thousands of miles away from their actual "home country". America, the world's #1 bully nation, operating under a cloak of benevolence, the insane lie that it seeks to "help" other countries and people by giving them the gift of "freedom", roams the planet, constantly picking fights with existing governments, taunting existing governments, imposing it's fascist will upon existing governments, trying to goad the leaders of other governments into agreeing to engage in a war. This is all done under the moral pretense that the democratic form of government is superior, and that america has a moral obligation to save and rescue citizens of other countries from "unjust oppression". Ha! All the while, the american government imposes brutally unjust oppression upon it's own citizen-slaves, to a degree that is equal to and often exceeds that of other governments. As long as a moral pretense of benevolent superiority is maintained, the insane justifications and explanations that the american government gives for it's global bullying, are heartily embraced by the brainwashed citizenry.

Governments that are truly evil become the primary leaders within international governmental entities such as NATO and the United Nations, and use their terroristic power and military might to coerce and bribe leaders of other nations into agreeing to support their policies, adopt their doctrine, and import their goods. Even more importantly, NATO and the united nations provide moral cover for the genocidal aggression of evil governments like america, along with the victim-nations of american genocide, america’s war partners. America is the lead bully nation in both of these organizations. Whenever it seeks to undertake a new war, commit genocide, impose it's fascist will upon another nation, all that it needs to do is "convince" fellow nation-members of NATO and the united nations, that they need to agree to publicly support and declare as appropriate and necessary, the maliciousness that the american government wishes to undertake. If this occurs, complete moral cover is achieved, since the american government can simply say that the "entire world community, all civilized nations, feel that we must act now..." You creatures are far too broken and brainwashed to see through even this incredibly transparent sham of an explanation. The fact is, 2 or 3 bully nations, with america at the #1 position by far, run NATO and the united nations, dictating and imposing not only their ideological agenda upon all of the other, far weaker and subservient nations, but literally terrorizing all the other governments into agreeing to endorse and support whatever malicious, immoral, and unjust policies these 2-3 bully nations desire to impose upon the world at large, then these 2-3 most malicious of governments use the coerced, terrorized "support" that they get from the subservient governments, to establish a claim of moral authority, legitimacy, and superiority, with regard to the perverse international policies that they engage in. Just like a street gang increases it's power and authority by recruiting new members, or forming an alliance with another, usually weaker and subservient gang, ultra-diseased governments like america team up with other ultra-diseased governments, like england and israel, to increase their worldwide bullying power, as well as forming "mutually beneficial" alliances, in reality terroristically coerced and bribed alliances, with a ton of much smaller, weaker, essentially helpless governments, for the purpose of establishing and maintaining the illusion that a "world community of civilized nations", supports and backs up the worldwide political agenda of the american government. So, if america decides to undertake yet another genocidal, unprovoked war, all it has to do is cloak the genocide within the cover provided by the united nations and nato international organizations, by decreeing that "The entire civilized world supports us and agrees that this must be done..." The Truth of course, is that the american government has shamelessly bribed, coerced, and threatened other nations, using it's military and economic power as well as it's sheer size and terrifyingly obvious willingness to attack any government that dares to try and defy it, into agreeing to provide this sham moral cover that the american government operates under, in it's genocidally malevolent international political policies. It is True that just in recent years, a few of the terrorized and bullied nations, most of them direct victims of american genocide, have found the courage to band together and attempt to defy the will of the world’s #1 bully nation. But they have enjoyed very little success in these efforts, which are simply demonized by the american government and the Western media whores as being "malicious defiance of necessary and moral policies", even though they in fact represent an attempt to block the most evil, destructive, malicious society on the planet, from initiating and carrying out new campaigns of genocide.

To conclude this essay: Politics and elections, within democratic governments, consist of pure fascism and totalitarianism, masquerading as freedom. Any human who believes that their government provides them with genuine freedom of any kind, political or otherwise, is an utter fool. And the same goes for any human who believes that their "system" of government is better, more moral and humane, than any other system of government is. All governmental systems are totally lacking all individual or personal freedom, fascist, and malevolent. And yet it can be fairly said that as a general rule, the governments which spend the most time and effort trying to delude their citizen-slaves into believing that they do enjoy political freedom, are slightly more oppressively malevolent in design and structure, than the governments that more honestly rely upon the direct threat of violence/death, to retain the loyalty of their citizen-slaves. Believing that you are free when in fact you are totally unfree, the american government version of fascist governmental rule, is worse than knowing that you are unfree and feeling too scared, impotent, and uninspired to consider trying to gain your freedom, which is how cuba, iraq, and other governments retain their power. In the end, freedom is not the primary issue. No government offers any semblance of genuine freedom, and the vast majority of you don't even want to be free. You want at most, to be able to delude yourself into believing that you are free, and believing that your life has a point to it. Your intellect is your burden, because it is genetically broken and diseased. All you need in life is food, clothing, shelter from the elements. All you need is to be alive and to love yourself. But from the moment of your birth, your societies feed you an endless stream of ideological excreta, lies, myths, hypocrisy, all designed to get you to sacrifice your personal freedom, abdicate and destroy your self-love, and convince you to devote your life to "pledging allegiance" to a worthless piece of cloth and to the very source that is responsible for and guilty of the childhood and lifetime of suffering and unjust victimization that you have personally been and continue to be, subjected to. That source is the government and the society that you were born into, raised up within, or live as a member of. So go right ahead, fools, pledge your allegiance to your greatest victimizer and oppressor, agree to fight and die in defense of the one institution that is most responsible for robbing you of your freedom, your government. Satiate the homicidal rage that your government is responsible for causing you to feel, by committing murder on behalf of your government, upon the demand of your government. Do it. Wallow in your insanity and inferiority, as you continue to desperately reject and renounce the unbearable Truths of human life. Just know that a tiny handful of your fellow humans are different. Superior. We bathe in the glorious glow of Truth. It's always there folks, the Truth. It's there for you to embrace, or to reject, as your own unique True Reality dictates.

To access thousands of additional Forbidden Truths on all aspects of human existence visit The Manifesto of Forbidden Truth website at:

http://forbiddentruth.8k.com

This entire essay is the Copyrighted, intellectual Property of The Seer of Forbidden Truth. All Rights are Reserved. Any for-profit reproduction of the text of this essay, in whole or in part, without the expressed and written consent of The Seer of Forbidden Truth is prohibited and constitutes a violation of law. © 2008-2058 The Seer of Forbidden Truth.