|
60 years Israel Nothing to celebrate! Remember the Palestinian NaqbaAnonyme, Vendredi, Mai 16, 2008 - 20:24 (Analyses | Guerre / War)
Astrid Essed
In contrary to the outburst of festivities among zionists and their adherents, regarding the ´´celebration´´ of the 60th anniversary of the State of Israel, for the Palestinian victims of the etnic cleansings in 1948 and 1967 and the continuing occupation, there is nothing to celebrate Dear Editor and readers, On the 14th of may, it was exactly 60 years ago, that the Israeli-zionist politician, Mr D Ben Gurion, proclaimed onesidedly, the State of Israel In remembrance of the Palestinian victims of the Israeli etnical cleansings in 1948 and 1967 Therefore I consider it as my moral duty, to speak for them Kind regards Astrid Essed Amsterdam The 60th anniversary of Israel: Nothing to celebrate "The Arabs will have to go, but one needs an opportune moment for making it happen, such as a war." See for picture of Palestinian refugees: http://www.palestineremembered.com/Articles/General/Story1649.html Dear Editor and readers, According to my opinion, there is no reason whatsoever to celebrate the 60 anniversary of the State of Israel [1] The proclamation: First, the State of Israel has been founded as a neo-colonialistic enterprise, seeing the acceptation of UN General Assembly Resolution, 181, in 1947, the socalled ''Partition Plan for Palestine'', without any voice for the native and rightful Palestinian population [2] Moreover, the UN Resolution 181 was in contrary with the UN Charter regarding the rights of people on selfdetermination Secondly, due to the onesided proclamation of the State of Israel, by the former zionist politician, Mr D Ben Gurion, dd 14-5 and the following military confrontation between the Arab troops and the zionist troops, the humanitarian consequences for the Palestinian civilian population were disastrous It is therefore no wonder, the Palestinians call this the Naqba, which means disaster For your information: The onesided proclamation of the State of Israel, by the Israeli politician Mr D Ben Gurion, was the result of the General Assembly UN Resolution, nr 181, dd 1947, by which the members of the UN [3] decided to the 'partition of the British Mandate Palestine, in a Jewish and an Arab part Palestine of 1947 is comparable geographically with Israel now, together with the occupied Palestinian territories A Origins of zionism: This UN resolution 181 was the result of the zionistic ideology, which was founded at the end of the 19th century by Mr T Herzl, which as an aim, the foundation of a Jewish State B Balfour Declaration By means of the Balfour Declaration, Great Britain guaranteed in 1917 to Lord Rotschild, chairman of the British zionist Federation, that in Palestine [till the end of the WO I a Turkish colony and from 1923, a British Mandate], Á Jewish National Home' should be founded [4] Altough there was a passage in the Declaration, that that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine'', by accepting a ''Jewish National Home'' in the country of another people, the rights on selfdetermination of the Palestinian people were seriously violated Even according to the colonial thought of that time, after the depart of the colonial occupation, the political and judicial power of the country should befell to the native population, in an independent Palestine This is how it happened in African and Asian colonies and also in Middle Eastern countries like Iraq, Lebanon and Syria and the preparation for the independence of Palestine was also established in the Mandatory order of Palestine, which Great Britain officially got from the ''League of Nations' [5] However, because of the Balfour Declaration, the whole concept of Palestinian self-determination had been undermined As well by means of the Balfour Declaration, as later, UN Resolution 181, behind the back of the Palestinian people, a part their country was being given to pioneers, who came from Europe, without any legal right to the country The writer Koestler says about this Balfour Declaration: 'With the Balfour Declaration, one nation solemnly promised to a second nation the country of a third." Therefore it is not astonishing, that the Balfour-Declaration and the zionistic aspirations and the British colonial role of divide and rule, provoked resistance in the Palestinian society C The foundation of the State of Israel Humanitarian implications of the war in 1948: The consequences of the acceptance of Resolution 181, dd 1947 and the onesided proclamation of the State of Israel, led to a war between the Israeli troops and the Palestinian and Arab troops, by which human rights violations and war-crimes were committed, on both sides [6] Also of importance is to realize, that the Israeli military offensive, Plan Dalet, had the aim of expulsion of the Palestinian people and destroying as many as Arab villages Referring to that occupation, I quote the ''introduction'' to Plan Dalet: ´´a) "The objective of this plan is to gain control of the areas of the Hebrew state and defend its borders. It also aims at gaining control of the areas of Jewish settlements and concentration which are located outside the borders (of the Hebrew state) against regular, semi-regular, and small forces operating from bases outside or inside the state.´´ Regarding the deliberate destruction of Arab villages I quote Section B of the Plan: ´´Destruction of villages (setting fire to, blowing up, and planting mines in the debris), especially those population centers which are difficult to control continuously. ... Mounting search and control operations according to the following guidelines: encirclement of the village and conducting a search inside it. In the event of resistance, the armed force must be destroyed and the population expelled outside the borders of the state. ´´ [7] Etnic cleansings: One of the most dramatic was the expulsion, by Israeli troops, of more than 750.000 Palestinian inhabitants, from their homes and land In terms of International Law, those are etnic cleansings, which are strictly forbidden according International Law, article 49, 4th Geneva Convention [8] Despite the General Assembly UN resolution 194, dd 1948, which summoned Israel, to make those people return to their homes or else give them a financial compensation, either the first [make them return], nor the second [financial compensation] has been executed [9] Consequence is that those people are condemned to a desperate existence in one of the many refugee-camps Mass-slaughters: Moreover, a number of mass-slaughters in the Palestinian Arab villages, by Israeli paramilitary terrorgroups [like Irgun and Stern] have taken place [10] Occupation, from the very beginning: Israeli troops also conquered 20 percent of the areas, which according to Resolution 181, were the Arab part The rest of Palestine has been conquered by the Kingdom of Jordan [West-Bank] and Egypt'[Gaza] [11] D After 1948: 1967 After 1948, 1967: But the tragedy is going on: Since 1967, there is a nearly 41 years occupation from the Palestinian territories [the Westbank, Gaza and Eastern-Jerusalem], despite the unanimously accepted UN Security Resolution dd 242, which summoned Israel to withdraw its troops from all foreign territories, which were conquered in the june war of 1967, including the Palestinian [12] Untill now, Israel has not executed this resolution Old sins repeated Also after the june war, 250.000 Palestinians were expulsed from their homes In the Netherlands, the people said and proclaimed ''We are behind Israel'' Humanitarian consequences of the occupation: Inherent to any occupation, so also the Israeli, are oppression, humiliations and human rights violations Of course there came resistance, whether legal, by military attacking the Israeli occupation army, or illegal, by military attacking Israeli civilians, by suicide-attacks, or rocketing cities [13] Israeli arbitrary military attacks: Israeli crimes during the occupation mostly take form in arbitrary military attacks in dense populated areas or other civilian areas like refugee-camps, which is a serious violation of International Humanitarian Law According tio International Humanitarian Law, all conflict parties, are obliged to make at all times, a strict distinction between combatants [military and fighters] and non-combatants [civilians] [14] When there is no clear situation, for example the presence of fighters in civilian areas, which is often the case by Israeli military attacks, all measures should be taken to protect the civilian population It is obvious, that the protection seriously fails, by the use of anti-personnel weapons like clusterbombs or F 16's [which is forbidden according to International Law], and firing at homes and in other population areas. The result is often, many civilian victims, which are war-crimes, since the risk of civilian death could have been foreseen. [15] This also is the case, according to the Isaeli practice of liquidations of leaders or activists of Palestinian political organisations. Punishment for war-crimes: Not only those military practices stem from a total lack of respect for the right on life of Palestinian civilians, also individual military war-crimes, like shooting civilians [among else, children] or journalists, seldom are punished according to International standards In some cases, there is no trial at all [16] Settlements: Of great importance to be mentioned is the foundation, from the end of the sixties of the former century, of Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories Despite international condemnation of the settlements, resulting in two UN Security Resolutions, one in 1979 [nr 446] and the other in 1980 [465], Israel has continued the building of the settlements. Also Israel didn't respond the agreements in the Roadmap for Peace, to freeze the expansion of the settlements, since untill now, there is an expansion in the West Bank and Eastern-Jerusalem The building of the Wall, across Palestinian occupied territories: The image of landtheft and injustice is completed by the building, accross Palestinian occupied territories, of the Israeli Wall Epilogue: It may be obvious, that ''60 years Israel'', which is celebrating with such an enthousiasm in Israel, supported by certain Western leaders, is a mourning day for the Palestinians With the right on their side, they consider the ''foundation'' of the State of Israel, stemming from the colonial zionism, as a Naqba [disaster] Not only in respect with the etnical cleansings and mass-slaughters in 1948, but also in respect with the occupation of their land, which is being suffered every day again In remembrance of the victims of thishistorical shame and injustice Kind regards Amsterdam Background-information regarding Mr T Herzl, founder of zionism: About Theodor Herzl: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Herzl Theodor Herzl: The Jewish State http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/6640/zion/judenstaadt.html About the aims of zionism: Rabbi Dr. Chaim Simons, A Historical Survey of Proposals to http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/7854/transfer.html [1] Article about the Palestinian refugee-problem http://scotland.indymedia.org/node/3396 Letter of 100 prominent Jews: ''We are not celebrating Israels anniversary'' See http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/30/israelandthepalestinians [2] Yet apart from not hearing the voice of the Palestinian people, the UN resolution was contrary the UN Charter regarding the rights of people on self-determination, which included, that the whole part of Palestine should befell to the Palestinian people, as native people, who had been colonized See Article 1, 2, about the selfdetermination of all people, referring among else to the decolonisation-process Added information regarding Resolution 181: Although the UN partition-plan for Palestine had been approved by the UN [by means of UN resolution 181], it didn't imply yet the official acknowledgment of the ''Jewish State'', since there was still UN-discussion about the ''tutelage'' of Palestine [3] Most of the members consisted of still existing Western colonial Powers, which had no fundamental objection, in their strand of thinking, to violate the rights on selfdetermination of the native Palestinian people [4] Balfour Declaration http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration_of_1917 [5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Nations [6] At april 13th, 4 days after the Deir Yassin massacre, there was an Arab military attack on a medical convoy travelling to Haddassah Hospital, with as a tragic result the death of 77 doctors, nurses, and other Jewish civilians. [7] Plan Dalet Israeli military offensive in the war dd 1948, with as most important aim the occupation of an important piece of the area, which was destined, by UN Resolution 181, to the Palestinian Arabs See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Dalet [8] The 4th Geneva Convention http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/7c4d08d9b287a42141256739003e636b/6756482d861... Etnic cleansings: Strong, overwhelming and scientifically well build evidence of those etnic cleansings is given by the Israeli New Historians and also from other historical surveys: New Historians: The then official Israeli history alleged, that the Palestinians have left their homes ''voluntarily'' by a summon of the Arab army radio, to leave the area, untill the zionist military were defeated This was already challenged by a great number of important publicists, among else stemming from the fact, that seen the refugee character, the people left in great panic However, the New Historians showed with strong scientific proof, greatly stemming from the Israeli army archives, that the Palestinian, instead, were expulsed by Israeli army troops and paramilitary terror organisations like Irgun and Stern The New Historians showed with strong scientific proof, greatly stemming from the Israeli army archives, that the Palestinian, instead, were expulsed by Israeli army troops and paramilitary terror organisations like Irgun and Stern See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Historians http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benny_Morris http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avi_Shlaim [9] About UN General Assembly resolution 194 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_General_Assembly_Resolution_194 [10] Deir Yassin, one of the Arab villages, where a masslaugher under the Palestinian civilian population took place Zie http://www.deiryassin.org/mas.html Testimony of Mr de Reynier, head of the Red Cross-delegation in Palestine http://www.debriefing.org/1026.html Eyewitness-testimony of Colonel Meir Pael [the former mr Meir Pilevsky], who had been a Palmach-soldier during the tragic events in Deir Yassin http://www.ariga.com/peacewatch/dy/dypail.htm [11] There is strong scientific evidence, that there has been a secret agreement between King Abdullah of Jordania and the zionist leadership, by which the king got the opportunity to conquer the now occupied Palestinian territory, the Westbank http://www.fathom.com/course/72810001/session2.html The writer of the article in the link, Mr Avi Shlaim, is one of the socalled Israeli ''New Historians [see above], like Mr B Morris and the most famous, Mr I Pappe, who broke through the Israeli historical image, that the Palestinians had left their homes ''voluntarily'', in the war in 1948 [12] The text of the UN Security Resolution 242 [13] However rejectable, one must keep in mind, that the suicide attacks began rather ''late'' in the occupation time-line, namely after 1994, when Dr B Goldstein intentionally massacred 29 Palestinian muslims, while praying in the Cave of the Patriarchs See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baruch_Goldstein In International Humanitarian Law, military attacks on civilians, regardless the conflictsparty of the nature of the conflict, are war-crimes See also http://hrw.org/english/docs/2008/02/29/isrlpa18177.htm [14] http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/5KZFJU [15] http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/09/01/isrlpa16786.htm http://hrw.org/reports/2007/iopt0707/ http://hrw.org/english/docs/2008/04/19/isrlpa18600.htm [16] http://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/iopt0605/ http://hrw.org/english/docs/2008/05/01/isrlpa18702.htm [17] According to article 49, 4th Geneva Convention, the Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories are illegal See 4th Geneva Convention: http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/7c4d08d9b287a42141256739003e636b/6756482d861... See also the Hague Convention: http://net.lib.byu.edu/~rdh7/wwi/hague/hague5.html See also: http://www.btselem.org/English/Settlements/ [18] ICJ verdict dd july 2004 regarding the building of the Israeli Wall http://domino.un.org/UNISPAl.NSF/2ee9468747556b2d85256cf60060d2a6/3740e39487a5428a85256ecc005e157a! |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une
Politique éditoriale
, qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.
|