People tend to ask the wrong questions or the right questions in the wrong order.

I've been following the gang-stalking phenomena with great interest. I see a lot of misery, and I commiserate with that. But, real action will be required to change anything.

The focus needs to be not on what the stalkers know they can probably get away with, but on the money-changing up the ladder that precipitates the ordeal. People tend to ask the wrong questions or the right questions in the wrong order.

Who/What/When/Where/Why/How?

The answer to the "who" question, we have generally answered, but is subject to much refinement. The "what" question smacks us in the face everyday, so it's answered already. Dittos for the "when" and "where" questions. The answer to the "how" question defines the mechanics, interesting to technicians, and useful if it helps to answer the "Who/What/Why/When/Where" questions. We tend to spend too much time on the mechanical details embodied in the "what", and possibly the "how" questions. [They did this and that, this and that, (repeat, repeat) ]. We need to be proactive, and answer each question fully enough to lead us back to the source, the culprit, the "Who".

I believe in the old adage, "Follow the Money". It usually solves the crime. In fact, the only way any of the perpetrators of this folly will ever be prosecuted is via the money trail.

It is not very likely that any one person would be held accountable for serious charges because they had sliced your automobile tires, especially if such a person had no previous criminal record. However; another person who effectively "hired" many people to routinely slice or puncture your tires, or to perform other similar acts, even if such acts (by themselves) had low perceived criminal values, could be held up to very serious charges, especially in the case of a tragic outcome.

The Stalking Organization depends upon the perceived low criminal value associated with each cumulative act, while the total accumulation annihilates the target. This is a little akin to a hundred people walking by your table, each of them depositing a non lethal dose of arsenic into your drink. After you die, each of them will disclaim any responsibility for your murder.

On the other hand, the person who hired them could easily be prosecuted, with the substantive proof of the monetary transaction.




Back to the Money Trail

My experiences tell me that the Stalking Organization (hereafter known as the S.O.) is an effective tool for the rich and elite to destroy those whom they deem "problematic". The S.O. was created wholly to service wealthy and government clients, and to do it for profit. The S.O. was created by criminals for the facilitation of plunder, but there likely exists a government connection, borne of common interest and convenience.

Let me explain ...

In order to facilitate the active participation of many citizens, which is absolutely a prerequisite for the observed style of gang stalking, each potential citizen enlistee must be seduced with something that they believe is not connected with participation in major crime. An unfortunate possibility is that the seduction comes in the form of Community Watch, Citizens Corp, and others. The S.O. likely does not
own all of the activities of government sponsored community groups (Only the ones who stalk you).

I believe that the S.O. may have utilized citizen groups to garner the brute force of a large personnel base and it's attendant organizational structure. The structure must be the most important part of the plan, and the unholy warlords of psycho-crime could not operate without it. The money that they would extract from the government would help to pay "foot soldier" salaries and would be a bonus. While the real money profits pour in from the clients, the organization may run it's "assassination factory" for free by tapping into government funds that have been diverted to criminal activities.

Believable? Just how easy is it to acquire monies to fund citizen groups? Let us look at some examples:

COPS and Weed/Seed - Community Oriented Policing Services

When I began looking into the COPS program, I was amazed at how obviously susceptible to graft and corruption it is. In the nutshell, any company or organization, "for profit" or "not for profit", can apply for a grant (or multiple grants) to "Combat Crime in our Neighborhoods". A simple form, downloadable from the DOJ, provides a means by which any such organization may submit a "proposal", including a trivial amount of detail, for "Combating Crime" in our neighborhoods.

The COPS guidelines are simple.

• 1 - Each grant request must be limited to $500,000, but multiple grants are possible.
  
  
• 2 - The funds may be used for salaries, office materials, and technological "tools" (Technology requests require a separate form)
  
  

The Weed/Seed guidelines are equally simple:

• 1 - Organization must put up 25% of the total grant requested, and can request up to $1,000,000 annually.
  
  
• 2 - Grant disbursements must be based upon the direction of a "steering committee", which must include at least one member of law enforcement.
  
  
• The steering committees are generally populated by citizens who are also members of the Neighborhood Association(s) or Area(s) for which the grant(s) are being requested. These people may spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on "Crime" projects, and (at their discretion) use it to pay foot soldiers (Foot patrol personnel, etc).
  
  

The DOJ's liberal grants of money to civilian organizations effectively debunks the major myth that pervades the public about "Community Watch" programs: that the groups are necessarily "volunteer" organizations. It is a fact that a government structure exist to pay these people to walk the streets.

Example:

A Hawaiian newspaper published a story about a town that utilized the Weed/Seed monies to set up a one man monitoring station, receiving $70,000 for the purchase of 7 cameras, the man's salary, and related equipment to monitor a street. His usage was probably legit, as (apparently) the street was rife with drug crime, and (purportedly) the purpose of the Weed/Seed money is to fight real crime. However; it is easy to see how the monies that are doled out may be used for less noble purposes. The same article describes a "one man" Weed/Seed organization.

by - LifeLibertyHappiness (to all)