|
The Lone Star Iconoclast - NewsAnonyme, Mercredi, Mai 9, 2007 - 21:43
Cpt. Eric H. May
Please accept this as an official Ghost Troop alert to the prospect of more government treason like 9/11. Please do not read my remarks as a prediction. The nature of the information contained in your article and my observations is not specific enough for this command to issue a prediction. The Lone Star Iconoclast - News Captain May: In light of this week's events, do you have any comments regarding this story? W. Leon Smith www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=1419&z=134 Dear Mr. Smith, I believe that the Sunday (5/6) U.S. media release of a new "Al Qaeda / Al Zawahari" message is meant to revive the American people's fear of "Islamic terrorism." You noted, no doubt, that Al Zawahari's remarks labeled the Democrats as defeatists emphasized the importance of Iraq and generally insulted the USA. These are all points that might have come from the mouth of Karl Rove, since they mirror Bush Administration rhetoric. In fact, I think the statements -- and the entire message -- did originate with Karl Rove and the White House, which has constructed and controlled the Al Qaeda myth since 9/11. On Tuesday, (5/8) the U.S. medial promulgated an FBI story about a "home grown" terror cell's intention to attack soldiers at Fort Dix, New Jersey. This story was an echo of summer, 2006, "Global War" propaganda asserting that "Canadian Al Qaeda" intended to capture Parliament and behead the prime minister, and that Florida-based Al Qaeda "wannabes" intended to blow up the Sears Tower. Today U.S. media is spinning the Fort Dix plan as reminiscent of 9/11 and Al Qaeda, thereby causing the most anxiety to the American people. The Bush Administration/U.S. media propaganda cycle, in short, supports our concern that the Homeland Security/Defense Department mass terror exercises now under way across much of the nation may be a pretext for a pre-planned false flag terror attack against the American people. Please accept this as an official Ghost Troop alert to the prospect of more government treason like 9/11. Please do not read my remarks as a prediction. The nature of the information contained in your article and my observations is not specific enough for this command to issue a prediction. As you know, I have published with your newspaper on the date-coding of false flag terror attacks. Informed people know that "Al Qaeda" has been credited with attacks that, amazingly, frequently carry the odd-numbered month with the 11th day of that month. For instance, New York (2001) was on 9/11, Madrid (2004) was on 3/11, and Mumbai/Bombay (2006) was on 7/11. There are date-code variations such as Amman, Jordan (2005) which carried the 11/9 date code (9/11 reversed), and London (2005), which carried the date-code 7/7 (or 7 x 11). However you look at it, whether as a true believer of the official Al Qaeda story or (like you and me) as a skeptic who believes that Al Qaeda is in reality " Al CIA duh," these terror events show that terror attack planners are obsessed with the number "11." 5/11 occurs Friday, and 5/11 is the missing date code in the sequence containing 3/11, 7/11, 9/11. Accordingly, I urge you and all other patriots to be especially vigilant on 5/11. Best regards, Captain Eric H. May PS: For those who want to know more about Ghost Troop, our work, or me. I refer them to my "May Day interview" with the Iconoclast, published last week: http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=1386&z=132. At the end of the interview you kindly posted key references to our prior work in analyzing and anticipating false flag terror. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une
Politique éditoriale
, qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.
|