|
Hariri: Disturbing questions about UN's 'assassinationAnonyme, Dimanche, Octobre 30, 2005 - 05:55
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed & Henk Ruyssenaars
UN'S MEHLIS REPORT DISCREDITED: INTERNATIONAL ESPIONAGE OVER SYRIA? - Earlier, as Berlin public prosecutor, Mehlis inadvertently but consistently covered up the dubious involvement of US, Israeli and German intelligence interests. Part 1 - by Henk Ruyssenaars - ex N-Africa & M-East correspondent* Oct. 30th - 2005 - The article below is one I wanted to write too, after living and working for ten years in the area, but since this is so eloquent and has so many facts, it's better to forward it. And of course the whole Hariri case is clear as crystal when one asks the simple question: Who Profits? Absolutely NOT Syria - which according to me in this affair is falsely blamed for the assassination of Hariri - with one million Syrians working in their former province Lebanon and the threat of war looming overhead - would never 'shoot itself in the foot' in this extremely stupid way. The only ones profiting from this 'False Flag' state terror are the United States of Israel, the criminal neocons running the global disaster right now, and they have 'Syria in the Imperialist Crosshairs' - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/a5j87 The assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri - with Bush and Blair's neocon managers fomenting and advocating openly and without any real evidence international pressure on Syria - is better understood with the background-info at the 'links' above and here - "German TV exposes CIA, Mossad links to 1986 Berlin disco bombing" - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/8jfph According to former Israeli intelligence colonel Victor Ostrovsky, in his sworn testimony for the Lockerbie trial, Mossad commandos had set up a transmitter in Tripoli, the Libyan capital, generating false telex signals about the “success
Syria would never 'shoot itself in the foot' in this extremely stupid way.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une
Politique éditoriale
, qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.
|