Richard Pryor says: "Close Down the Motherfuckers!"

	Sujet:  animal testing or human testing? Auteur-e:  Sapin Date:  Sam, 2004-07-03 16:00
	On whom will they test products if they don't test them on animals? Two possibilities: 1- They will not test the products, so they will sell products containing chemicals that may present a risk for health. That may be good for the companies because it will lower their production costs and they will add a little label saying "this product has not been tested on animals", so it will improve their corporate image too. 2- They will test products on human beings. They will hire poor people, students and the like and pay them cheap wages to endanger their lives to test products. Conclusion: is it better to be cruel to humans than to animals? [ ]

	Sujet:  effacé Auteur-e:  Deland Date:  Ven, 2005-03-18 02:46
	effacé par CMAQ raison: lien vers publicité [ ]

Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une Politique éditoriale , qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.

This is an alternative media using open publishing. The CMAQ collective, who validates the posts submitted on the Indymedia-Quebec, does not endorse in any way the opinions and statements and does not judge if the information is correct or true. The quality of the information is evaluated by the comments from Internet surfers, like yourself. We nonetheless have an Editorial Policy , which essentially requires that posts be related to questions of emancipation and does not come from a commercial media.