In response to a war waged in opposition to worldwide public opinion, activists and regular citizens from Toledo to Tokyo are taking up the boycott in hopes of deterring the USA from continuing its attacks on Iraq.
Activist groups have organized some of the boycott efforts; others are direct expressions of public opinion.
Boycotts getting organized: many of the major boycott campaigns have banded together under the umbrella group the Global Boycott for Peace, or GBP.
Among the members of the GBP, boycott efforts have included:
The International group for Direct Economic Action against war (IDEA) continues
its flexible boycott strategy, offering boycotters options for both general
and targeted boycotts, listing the top 2, 10, and 20 boycott targets
San Francisco-based BoycottUS rallied local support as protests continued
in the City by the Bay
13 members of the European Parliament signed on for a boycott of US corporations
sponsored by the boycott organization For Mother Earth
New Zealanders launched Stop USA, a group of "angry Kiwi consumers" dedicated
to promoting a U.S. boycott in the South Pacific
In Japan, Peace Choice Campaign has begun a grassroots campaign to boycott
U.S. goods
Halving her credit cards in protest, American Liz Snyder launched Stop Spending,
which includes a personal "spending blog" about participating in the boycotts
Also in the USA, the cyber campaign known as We Won't Shop Until Attack
Talk Stops has Americans pledging to reduce their consumer spending by a dollar
amount, currently pledges total $166,250
In Australia, Peace Action offers "the B-lists" offering consumers comprehensive
lists of corporations who both support and oppose the war against Iraq
In the USA, Be the Cause has also continued to target specific brands (such
as Kraft and Philip Morris) for a consumer boycott
In New Zealand, Spend for Peace continues its boycott of US products, encouraging
boycotters to write letters to companied, political leaders, and US ambassadors
German cyber-campaign Consumers Against War advocates a boycott of a couple
of dozen American brands
Collectively, Global Boycott for Peace, along with For Mother Earth, is sponsoring
its first day of direct boycott actions on April 15th 2003. Protesters around
the globe will voice their plans to boycott at local shopping districts, gas
stations, and strip malls across the globe.
Other boycotts include:
Influential Vancouver-based Adbusters Magazine continues to promote its
"Boycott Brand America" campaign, where 37715 individuals have pledged to
boycott major American brands "until the empire learns to listen"
Protesters in Tokyo urged a boycott of US-made products, and displayed a
list of popular US brands to be spurned, including, Nike, Coke, and McDonalds
In Qatar, locals have used SMS, text messages sent over mobile phones, to
advocate a boycott of American and British products
Shopkeepers in Pakistan have vowed to boycott both British and American
goods.
The Brasil Worker's Party has called for a Country-wide ban of American
goods, focusing predominantly on Exxon-Mobil gasoline
Waiters in restaurants across Germany are telling customers that Coke is
off the menu because of the U.S.-led war against Iraq
One German bicycle manufacturer, Riese and Mueller Gmbh, cancelled $300,000
worth of deals with US suppliers
In Mexico, the Autonomous University of Queretaro (UAQ) called on students
not to consume products that originate in the United Status for two months,
in rejection of the Unites States-led war in Iraq
According to Pattrice Jones of IDEA, the boycott represents a form of nonviolent
direct action. In contrast to symbolic demonstrations of opinion, boycotts have
a direct and immediate impact on their targets. The idea behind the Global Boycott
for Peace movement is that the Bush regime has listened to neither public opinion
nor the United Nations, but is known to listen to US corporations. If the corporations
begin to suffer, they will make their discomfort known to Bush, who will be
compelled to alter his behavior accordingly. The growing international boycott
movement is a grassroots phenomenon, with boycott websites and calls to action
springing up spontaneously in diverse locations. Boycott strategies are also
diverse, ranging from refusal to purchase any US or UK goods to ostracism of
only those corporations known to support or likely to profit from the war. However,
the recent formation of the Global Boycott for Peace foreshadows the formation
of a large and sustained boycott emerging as the war in Iraq drags on.
American Liz Snyder of Stop Spending states, "I refuse to ignorantly put
my money into the pockets of those whose actions I oppose. These companies made
large contributions to the Bush administration, and they lobby this administration
to make sure the government meets their needs. Let's make sure that what these
companies need is an end to war against Iraq."
Even if that doesn't work, say some boycotters, they would still shun US goods
and services in order to ensure that their own money doesn't help to pay for
a war they consider to be illegal and immoral. When Tanzanian President Julius
Nyerere took up the call to boycott goods coming from apartheid South Africa,
he wrote: "Can we honestly condemn a system and at the same time employ
it to produce goods which we buy, and then enjoy with a clear conscience?"
Boycotters of the Global Boycott for Peace and across the world today are embracing
the same philosophy, refusing to purchase the goods of a country whose actions,
in good conscience, they cannot support.
Ceci est un média alternatif de publication ouverte. Le collectif CMAQ, qui gère la validation des contributions sur le Indymedia-Québec, n'endosse aucunement les propos et ne juge pas de la véracité des informations. Ce sont les commentaires des Internautes, comme vous, qui servent à évaluer la qualité de l'information. Nous avons néanmoins une
Politique éditoriale
, qui essentiellement demande que les contributions portent sur une question d'émancipation et ne proviennent pas de médias commerciaux.
This is an alternative media using open publishing. The CMAQ collective, who validates the posts submitted on the Indymedia-Quebec, does not endorse in any way the opinions and statements and does not judge if the information is correct or true. The quality of the information is evaluated by the comments from Internet surfers, like yourself. We nonetheless have an
Editorial Policy
, which essentially requires that posts be related to questions of emancipation and does not come from a commercial media.